Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

4k25 research 3

FPX4025 Research

Assessment 3

Applying the PICO(T) Process

Create a 3–5 page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments and analyze the evidence you locate to answer the question.

Expand All

Introduction

PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation.

It stands for:

· P – Patient/population/problem.

· I – Intervention.

· C – Comparison (of potential interventions, typically).

· O – Outcomes.

· T – Time frame (if time frame is relevant).

The end goal of applying PICO(T) is to develop a question that can help guide the search for evidence (Boswell & Cannon, 2015). From this perspective, a PICO(T) question can be a valuable starting point for nurses who are beginning to apply an evidence-based model. By taking the time to precisely define the areas in which the nurse will be looking for evidence, searches become more efficient and effective. Essentially, by precisely defining the types of evidence within specific areas, the nurse will be more likely to discover relevant and useful evidence during their search. When applying the PICO(T) approach, the nurse can isolate the interventions of interest and compare to other existing interventions for the evidenced impact on the outcome of the concern.

Reference

Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2015). 
Introduction to nursing research. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, healthcare systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.

PICO(T) is a framework that can help you structure your definition of the issue, potential approach that you are going to use, and your predictions related to the issue. Word choice is important in the PICO(T) process because different word choices for similar concepts will lead you toward different existing evidence and research studies that would help inform the development of your initial question. When writing a PICO(T)-formatted research question, you want to focus on the impact of the intervention and the comparison on the outcome you desire.

Scenario

For this assessment, please use the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments.

Instructions

After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it.

Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source’s specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICO(T) Question and Library Search template (accessible from the 

Create PICO(T) Questions
 page) might be helpful.

In your submission, make sure you address the following:

· Review the PICO(T) process.

· Explain your diagnosis from Assessment 1 in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications. In your explanation, be sure to include the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities and the impact of those disparities.

· Consider your diagnosis from Assessment 1. Develop a research question using the PICO(T) process to address an issue of your choosing related to your diagnosis.

· Properly format your PICO(T) question to guide your search of the literature.

· Describe your search of the literature, noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

· Locate evidence that explores your intervention and comparison of your PICO(T) question with an emphasis on your specific outcome (at least three diagnosis-issue-specific sources of evidence (scholarly articles)).

· Explain the content of each of your scholarly articles.

· Explain the credibility and relevance of each of the articles you chose to your diagnosis issue.

· Analyze the evidence. Determine the answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of the evidence.

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

·
Length of submission:
 Create a 3–5-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.

·
Number of references:
 Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

·
APA formatting: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

· Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

· Describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

· Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

· Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications, including the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

· Explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

· Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.

· Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

· Analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

continue

_________________________________________________________________________ Community: Bronzeville, chicago Overview In week 1 you identified the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in your community. These certainly indicate health needs. This week expand your thinking to other types of health needs your community as a whole and members of your community is or might be

IP1

Provide an overview of how healthcare in the United States has evolved since the post-industrial period.  How has the evolution of medical technology, graduate medical education, and the professionalization of medical and nursing staff affected the delivery of care?  Why has the United States been unsuccessful in evolving the current

DB 1

Discuss 3 current trends and directions for healthcare delivery in the United States and the role that managed care has in shaping those 3 trends.  Besides managed care, what other forces have influenced these trends and directions?  Are these trends and directions moving healthcare delivery in a positive direction? Explain

Master’s Prepared Nurse Leading Change

Students will develop a scholarly paper addressing a problem, issue, or situation needing change within the practice setting. The paper will address how the advanced practice nurse can facilitate and develop a road map for change. Assignment Criteria: 1. Identify a problem, issue, or situation needing change within the practice

NUR509CLW3

DISCUSSION: Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales. (CASE: PATIENT HAS

NUR509W3

DISCUSSION: A 52-year-old male patient who is a house painter presents to the office reporting chronic fatigue and “mild” chest pain. When he is painting, chest pain is relieved after taking a break. He reports that the pain usually lasts 5 minutes or less and occasionally spreads to his left

research

in this discussion, you will: TOPIC: BURNOUT IN Nursing  Introduce and define the general topic you have identified. Explain its significance to nursing and nursing research. Search for two (2) relevant articles on the topic to “make a case” for why your topic is relevant to nursing and nursing research,

SEARCHING DATABASES

MOD 3 DISCUSSION identify      a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

identifying research methodology

mod assign 2 Help identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

Nursing homework

In no more than 2 paragraph, write about how the DNP program support your my Carrers plan at UTHealth tower in 3-5 years

Nursing Interview assignment

Wilkes University Passan School of Nursing NSG 504 Assignment 1 Interview Assignment (20 points) Interview Guide • The purpose of this assignment is to explore the role of the advanced practice nurse (APN) in depth as she/he functions in the context of the institution in which he/she is employed. Compare

TW week 2 case study

TW week 2 case study  SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART”

Nutrition self assessment

NURS 225: Nutritional Self-Assessment Name:       Date:       This assignment must be typed. No handwritten submissions will be accepted. Part 1: 10 points Subjective information. Answer each question: 1. Family History: (check all that apply) ☐Diabetes ☐Heart Disease ☐Cancer ☐Weight Problems ☐High Cholesterol ☐Hypertension ☐Other       ☐None       How could

nu673

homework Patient Name: XXX MRN: XXX Date of Service: 01-27-2020 Start Time: 10:00 End Time: 10:54 Billing Code(s): 90213, 90836 (be sure you include strictly psychotherapy codes or both E&M and add on psychotherapy codes if prescribing provider visit) Accompanied by: Brother CC: follow-up appt. for counseling after discharge from

Nursing assignment part 2

assignment part 2 Add a section to the 2-3 page paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the following in 1-2 pages: · Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare issue/stressor. · Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization

Nursing Identifying Research Methodologies homework

Info and help with the template · To Prepare: · Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.  · Based

nursing

By Day 6 of Week 3 Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by supporting or expanding on the ideas identified by your colleague or sharing additional perspectives on the issue described by your colleague.

nursing

In your assigned group area: Post a brief description of the two studies you were assigned, with a particular focus on the study design and methods. Then: Describe at least one strength and one limitation of each study’s design. Identify the population, data sources, and epidemiologic measures of association that the