Description
Healthcare Quality Improvement Trends in Saudi Arabia (110 points)
Under the National Transformation Program within Saudi Vision 2030 goals of healthcare quality improvement in Saudi Arabia, substantial progress was made related to quality and efficiency of healthcare in KSA.
For this assignment, you will conduct a review on the accomplishments regarding digitizing the healthcare sector to better facilitate access to quality and efficient healthcare services in KSA.
Prepare a PowerPoint presentation detailing the following:
- Discuss in detail the quality improvement outcomes that have been achieved with digitization in the healthcare sector in KSA.
- Identify and examine the health sectors that are most impacted by these initiatives.
- Discuss any major opportunities that are still present in working towards the continuous improvement of these initiatives.
- Discuss what tools would be most useful in the quality improvement process of these initiatives.
- Discuss the next steps within the Healthcare Transformation Program related to expanding the provision of e-health services.
Your PowerPoint presentation should meet the following requirements:
- Include seven to eight slides, not including your title and reference slides.
- Each slide must provide detailed speakers notes, with a minimum of 100 words per slide. Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials.
- Provide support for your statements with citations from a minimum of six scholarly articles. These citations should be stated in the Notes section of the slide in which they appear. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but four must be external.
- Formatted per APA 7th edition and Saudi Arabia Electronic University formatting guidelines.
- Utilize headings to organize the content of your work.
- Professional design and transitions.
You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading.
Health Law and Ethics
Name
SEU_CT_Rubric_110
Description
110 Points
Rubric Detail
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Requirements
Content
Analysis
Sources
Exceeds
Expectation
Meets
Expectation
Below
Expectation
Limited
Evidence
25 to 30
points
19 to 24
points
13 to 18 points
7 to 12 points
Includes all of
the required
components,
as specified in
the
assignment.
Includes most
of the required
components,
as specified in
the
assignment.
Includes some
of the required
components,
as specified in
the
assignment.
Includes few
of the
required
components,
as specified in
the
assignment.
25 to 30
points
19 to 24
points
13 to 18 points
7 to 12 points
Demonstrates
substantial
and extensive
knowledge of
the materials,
with no errors
or major
omissions.
Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of
the materials;
may include
some minor
errors or
omissions.
Demonstrates
fair knowledge
of the
materials
and/or includes
some major
errors or
omissions.
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of
the materials
and/or
includes many
major errors
or omissions.
25 to 30
points
19 to 24
points
13 to 18 points
7 to 12 points
Provides
strong
thought,
insight, and
analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides
adequate
thought,
insight, and
analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides poor
though, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides little
or no thought,
insight, and
analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13 to 15
points
10 to 12
points
7 to 9 points
4 to 6 points
Sources go
above and
beyond
required
criteria and are
well chosen to
Sources meet
required
criteria and are
adequately
chosen to
provide
Sources meet
required
criteria but are
poorly chosen
to provide
substance and
perspectives
Source
selection and
integration of
knowledge
from the
course is
1/2
4/25/24, 6:20 PM
Health Law and Ethics
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
Exceeds
Expectation
Meets
Expectation
Below
Expectation
Limited
Evidence
provide
effective
substance and
perspectives
on the issue
under
examination.
substance and
perspectives
on the issue
under
examination.
on the issue
under
examination.
clearly
deficient.
5 to 5 points
4 to 4 points
3 to 3 points
1 to 2 points
Project is
clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format
as outlined in
the
assignment.
Strong
sentence and
paragraph
structure,
contains no
errors in
grammar,
spelling, APA
style, or APA
citations and
references.
Project is fairly
well organized
and written
and is in
proper format
as outlined in
the
assignment.
Reasonably
good sentence
and paragraph
structure, may
include a few
minor errors in
grammar,
spelling, APA
style, or APA
citations and
references.
Project is
poorly
organized and
written and
may not follow
proper format
as outlined in
the
assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or
major errors in
grammar,
spelling, APA
style or APA
citations and
references.
Project is not
organized or
well written
and is not in
proper format
as outlined in
the
assignment.
Poor quality
work;
unacceptable
in terms of
grammar,
spelling, APA
style, and APA
citations and
references.
View Associated
Items
Print
Close Window
2/2
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
