Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

608 part 2

Criterion 1

Summarize the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.

Distinguished

Summarizes the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community. Notes the rationale for pursing the issue, as well as a gap contributing to it.

Proficient

Summarizes the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.

Basic

Provides an unclear or incomplete summary of the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.

Non Performance

Does not provide any type of summary of the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.

Criterion 2

Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.

Distinguished

Identifies any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations. Supports assertion by using at least one piece of evidence (public health data, aggregated data from an organization, or other scholarly resource).

Proficient

Identifies any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.

Basic

Identifies disparities that exist with regards to the chosen economic issue. However, does not relate the disparities to any socioeconomic or diversity considerations.

Non Performance

Does not identify any disparities that exist with regards to the chosen economic issue.

Criterion 3

Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.

Distinguished

Explains the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans. Cites at least four relevant evidence-based or scholarly sources to support explanation.

Proficient

Explains the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.

Basic

Identifies the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources, but the relevance to regarding the need to address the chosen issue is unclear or misaligned.

Non Performance

Does not identify the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources.

Criterion 4

Explain the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan.

Distinguished

Explains the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan. Notes the specific economic benefits for patients and the organization.

Proficient

Explains the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan.

Basic

Identifies possible outcomes and opportunities of growth, but their relationship to the proposed change or implementation plan is unclear.

Non Performance

Does not identify possible outcomes and opportunities of growth.

Criterion 5

Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Distinguished

Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting. Notes the specific economic benefits for patients and the organization.

Proficient

Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. Attempts to apply APA style and formatting.

Basic

Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.

Non Performance

Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Project charter

Developing a project charter for a preceptorship project including a Gantt charter as part of the charter.

nur15

I need your expertise Presentation: Realistic Clinical Case Study For this assignment, you will develop a presentation on a realistic clinical case on a topic that is of interest to you. Content Requirements You will create a PowerPoint presentation with a realistic case study and include appropriate and pertinent clinical

week4 case study

ommon Gynecologic Conditions, Part 1 Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems or symptoms. Such case studies enable nurse learners to apply concepts, lessons, and critical thinking to interviewing, screening, and diagnostic approaches, as well as to the development of treatment

Budgfloat

Discuss the benefits and disadvantages of a facility using supplemental and floating staff. Compare and contrast how a staffing plan would differ with different nursing units. How does that affect the staffing budget?  

Case Study

Please follow APA format, add citations and references within 5 years old. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!  Topic: ADHD Case Presentation Paper (CO: 1-9): Students are required to complete a case presentation paper guided by a Nursing Theorist or Psychodynamic Theory to inform clinical care. The

WK6 QUESTIONS3 HP-216

COMPLETE WITH CODES Instructions: Assign the appropriate CPT E & M level, procedures and ICD-10-CM code(s) for the physician office encounter. When there are multiple CPT codes, always sequence E & M level first. When there are multiple ICD-10-CM codes, sequence first-listed diagnosis first. This patient was referred by her

module 4

please include a literature flow diagram must have 5 sources will include previous assignment for reference and has the 5 sources that can be used

Nursing HOMEWORK

Complex case study presentation · · Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide. Also review the Kaltura Media Uploader resource in the left-hand navigation of the classroom for help creating your self-recorded Kaltura video. · Select a child/adolescent or adult patient from your clinical experience that

nursing

T-Mobile: As of 09/17/2025, your line ending in 8910 has reached $58.00 in international call charges and/or calls to premium-rated numbers in this bill cycle. Visit t-mo.co/HBN2 for info. To avoid possible service interruption or for questions call 611

nursing

Post a response detailing the following:  Which contextual factors will promote getting your advocacy priority on the agenda?  Which contextual factors might work against it?

nursing

see files To prepare for your assessment, you will research the literature on your selected health care problem. You will describe the priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members. You will identify changes to the plan based upon EBP and

nursing

Respond to at least two colleagues on two different days in one or more of the following ways: Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research. Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives. Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the

nursing

Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by supporting or expanding on the ideas identified by your colleague or sharing additional perspectives on the analysis of contextual factors described by your colleague.

c5-ass2

root cause analysis Assessment 2 Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan Instructions Resources Activity Attempt 1 available Attempt 2 Attempt 3 InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3 For this assessment, you must use the supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be the template, focusing on the

c5-ass3

POWER POINT Assessment 3 Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation Instructions Resources Activity Attempt 1 available Attempt 2 Attempt 3 InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3 For this assessment, you will develop an 8–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with thorough speaker’s notes designed for a hypothetical in-service session related to the improvement plan you