7-3 IHP 600 Reflection Journal: Vaccines
The Institute for the Future predicted that new vaccines would be developed to treat noninfectious diseases, such as cancer. This prediction can be found in the Programming Immunity: Defense to Offense article. https://legacy.iftf.org/future-now/article-detail/programming-immunity-defense-to-offense/?p=future-now/article-detail/programming-immunity-defense-to-offense/
How would you decide whether to be one of the first individuals to try a “new” vaccine?
Submit your assignment here. Make sure you’ve included all the required elements by reviewing the rubric
IHP 600 Reflection Journal Guidelines and Rubric
Journals are private and between you and the instructor only. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity to reflect upon and apply what you learn based on the assigned readings, discussions, and activities, and (b) an opportunity to share your knowledge and expertise based on your educational and professional experiences in the past. As a successful professional, you will need good reflective and writing skills. Journal activities offer you the opportunity to further develop these skills.
What to Submit
Submit assignment(s) as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.
Reflection Journal RubricCriteriaExceeds Expectations (100%)Meets Expectations (90%)Partially Meets Expectations (70%)Does Not Meet Expectations (0%)ValueCritical Thinking and ReflectionAlmost all assignments support claims with relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought processMost of the assignments support claims with a relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought processSome of the assignments support claims with a relevant personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought processNone of the assignments support claims with reflection on relevant personal examples25Integration and ApplicationAlmost all assignments show excellent depth of knowledge of the module content and exhibit careful consideration of the topicMost of the assignments show good depth of knowledge of the module content and demonstrate that the student has read the module contentSome of the assignments show limited depth of knowledge, indicating the student may have reviewed the module content but needs to explore furtherNone of the assignments address the blog prompts and reflect that the student has not read the module content25VoiceAlmost all of the assignments are written in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience and a consistent voice is evident throughoutMost of the assignments are written in a style that is generally appropriate for the intended audience and an attempt is made to use a consistent voiceSome of the assignments are written in a style that considers the audience, but the author’s voice is not consistent and difficult to identifyNone of the assignments attempt to use a style that considers audience and there is no evidence of author voice25Clear CommunicationExceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understandingConsistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audienceShows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understandingShows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication25Total:100%
