Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Response 2.1

100 word response

1 reference/intext citation

Due 1/10/2025

Epps

Post 2 Q2:
Investigators often face tension between striving to prove a case and uncovering the truth. Are these orientations fundamentally different, or can they coexist within investigative work? Choose one orientation, explain your perspective, and use a real or hypothetical case example to illustrate this approach’s strengths and potential limitations.

In investigative work, there exists a critical ethical dilemma between the pursuit of proving a case and the commitment to uncovering the truth. Prioritizing truth over winning allows for a more nuanced understanding of the circumstances, emphasizing integrity and thoroughness. This approach not only serves justice but also enhances the credibility of investigators, fostering trust within the community and improving cooperation from witnesses. A focus on truth is essential in preventing miscarriages of justice, as it helps to protect innocent individuals from wrongful convictions and maintains the overall integrity of the justice system.

However, this commitment to uncovering the truth can present significant challenges. Thorough investigations often demand considerable time and resources, which may be scarce in high-pressure situations that prioritize expedient outcomes. Additionally, the emotional and psychological toll on investigators can be substantial, especially when confronting distressing realities in serious crime cases. Despite these potential limitations, the long-term benefits of seeking the truth underscore its importance in maintaining a just and equitable legal system.

A Hypothetical Example

The case of a robbery at a local convenience store highlights the difference between an investigator focused on proving guilt based on a suspect’s prior criminal record and one dedicated to uncovering the truth. While the former might quickly build a case against the suspect, the latter would conduct thorough interviews, review surveillance footage, and examine additional evidence, potentially revealing that the suspect was not at the scene and that another individual, without a criminal history, was responsible. This commitment to truth not only safeguards the innocent but also ensures that the real perpetrator is held accountable, resulting in a more just outcome for the community, despite requiring more time and effort. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

criminology

Instructions & Ethical System Assignments:   DB #4_Spring 2025.docx  Download DB #4_Spring 2025.docx   “Initial Post” Instructions: Read the following scenario and use the 5 steps to analyze ethical dilemmas (discussed in Chapter 2 and listed below) to solve the dilemma. You will be assigned one of two ethical systems

SCMT529

Read attachment for instructions  Instructions This paper is an essay assignment of three questions to test knowledge and assimilation of course objectives 1 and 2. 1. Describe the motivators that influence the terrorist mindset. What are common grievances or causes of modern international terrorists? 2. Describe the fundamental differences between

Criminal Justice

During this module we will continue our discussion by focusing on Critical Theory and Feminism Theory. During this module we will also watch one important movie related to our discussions. The title of the movie is “Crash” which is product of 2004. You need to use scholarly materials to support

Responses for 4/24

1. The ethical integrity of the judiciary is paramount to maintaining public trust in the legal system, particularly when it comes to the highest court in the United States. When justices are perceived to act outside the boundaries of ethical standards, the legitimacy of the entire institution is called into

Sab 2

Describe how convict criminology is a unique perspective.  How do feminist theories explain both female criminality and victimization? 

Law – Criminal Assignment 3

Due 4/25/2025 For this assignment, you should  build on previous assignments and discussion postings to create a comprehensive program evaluation plan. Using the program you have identified in assignments #1 and #2, (The University of Mississippi’s Prison to College Pipeline Program (PTCPP)) discuss the following aspects in detail:  description of

Lee 2

Discuss and post a link to a current event that may constitute a violation of ethics by a member of the courtroom workgroup. 

Final Submission: Research Study Report

 Final Submission: Research Study Report In Module Seven, you will submit your final project, which includes your newly created “discussion” section. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements listed in the prompt above. It should reflect the incorporation of relevant instructor and peer feedback

Discussion Question

View the PowerPoint labeled Entomology and the Life Cycle of a Fly in this week’s module and complete the last slide in the presentation marked Entomology and the Life Cycle of a Fly. Post that with your main post but also include a case where Entomology evidence helped solve the

Week 2

See attached  Wk 2 – Exclusionary Rule Evaluation Research the exclusionary rule. Write a 700- to 1,400-word paper in which you analyze the rationale and purpose of the exclusionary rule and identify exceptions to the rule. In your analysis, state the costs and benefits of the exclusionary rule, as well as alternative

Week 3

See attached Wk 3 – Criminal Procedure – Probable Cause Article Summary Find a recent news article on the Internet that concerns probable cause and criminal procedure. Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word summary of the article in which you analyze the requirements for search and arrest warrants, and how they relate to

Week 5

See attached Wk 5 – Jury Trial Analysis Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you articulate how a diverse or special population defendant’s rights at trial can be assured (ex: a deaf or elderly defendant). Discuss the pretrial process, jury selection (ex: voir dire), and determine how to insure

Week 4

See attached Wk 4 – Right to Counsel Assignment Determining the right to counsel depends on the circumstances of a case. For this assignment, select and complete one of the three options below to demonstrate what you have learned about the right to counsel.  Option 1: Right to Counsel Presentation

Wk 1

See attached Wk 1 – Criminal Procedure Policy Paper Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you describe the key elements of the rights guaranteed by the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments and their impact on criminal procedure by the courts and police officers. Include an explanation of how the Bill

Law – Criminal Weekly Assignment

See attached Wk 1 Discussion – Due Process Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: • Explain due process. • How does due process affect crime control models of the criminal justice system? • How can you improve the relationship between due process, crime control models, and

Responses

1. This week’s module readings were over labeling theories and conflict theories. Labeling theories are the theories that explain how societies reactions and beliefs about a crime labels it to the point of possibly causing it because of what you say, think, or belief about the criminal act. Reacting and