Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

week9

please see attached.

To Prepare

· Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.

· Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment. 

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

· Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

· Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from literature.

· Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

· Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

·
Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Nursing Assignment

Reflective Journal Objectives: 1. Reflect on thoughts, ideas, experiences, and insights related to the course. 2. Examine personal skills, frames of reference, and assumptions about the provision of care. 3. Gain insight on how students views themselves in relationship to others when engaged in therapeutic and professional communication. 4. Identify

home work

Appraise economical aspects that influence healthcare delivery systems. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “Grading rubric” in the right menu.  Scenario Your hospital received $4,000,000 in revenue this past year. Medicare withholds 2.6% of this amount ($) until the value-based purchasing scores are

Nursing homework

Questions? Think back to a time when you had a conflict with a person in the workplace.  It could be a coworker, patient, supervisor or a family member.  How did you handle the situation?  Was it appropriate and professional?   As your initial post, respond to the following questions.  1.

Nursing homework

Rahim Conflict Style Questionnaire Purpose 1. To identify your conflict style 2. To examine how your conflict style varies in different contexts or relationships Directions 1. Think of two different situations (A and B) where you have a conflict, a disagreement, an argument, or a disappointment with someone, such as

NUR 630

Stacy Weiner Module 3 discussion Depression does occur at the adolescent stage, adulthood, and even children in elementary school can also experience clinically significant depressive disorders. Nevertheless, these are not always taken into account or even understood within the U.S. primary education and pediatrics. The difficulty is in identifying depression

home work

Apply the principles of economics as they relate to nursing and healthcare. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “Grading rubric” in the right menu.  Scenario The nurse manager in orthopedics has asked for your assistance with a finance project. She is being asked

MOD 6 ASSIGNT

In this Discussion, you will share your experiences and consider the impact of patient involvement (or lack of involvement). You will also consider the use of a patient decision aid to inform best practices for patient care and healthcare decision making.

NU 675

Assignment Instructions Assignment Details Last week you completed the learning activity on ADHD. For this assignment, please discuss, in detail, the case presented in that learning activity. Your assignment should be a minimum 2- to 3-page paper discussing what you choose for the differentials, the diagnosis, and the treatment (include

Mod.3 Peds CL Discussion

Weekly Clinical Experience 3 Describe your clinical experience for this week. Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales. Mention the

NUR514CLW3

DISCUSSION: Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales. (EXTREME NAUSEA FIRST

NUR514W3

DISCUSSION: Once you received your case number; answer the specific question on the table above. Then, continue to discuss the 3 topics listed below for your case: 1. An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach

discussion 11/3

Case 2  Cases R.T. is a 35-year-old female patient who was seen in the clinic because she has been trying to get pregnant for about 7 months but she has not been successful. Only positive gynecologic history for R.T. has been three episodes of pelvic inflammatory disease in the last

Nursing week 7_Assignment- KEY STAKEHOLDER

 Key Stakeholders Assignment  Assignment Description-Key Stakeholders Assignment Support your content with at least four (4) sources throughout your presentation and include a reference slide. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices

Journal Response MODULE 7

Essential roles Graduate Journal Question Rubric v1 Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship Overall Score Level 1 0 points minimum Level 2 14 points minimum Level 3 16 points minimum Level 4 20 points minimum image1.png image2.png

nursing

nursing UIC NURS 332 Research on Nurse Caring  To be used in week 2 · Breneol, S., Goldberg, L., & Watson, J. (2019). Caring for children who are technology-dependent and their families: The application of Watsonʼs caring science to guide nursing practice. Advances in Nursing Science, 42(2), E13-E23. Caring for Children

Nursing homework

Write a synopsis of all of the Week 2 readings. which is about optimism and Realism and Avoidance and Engagement Using the readings from the Bible, the article, and the Conflict Paradox Week 2 assigned chapters, write a summary essay in 350 – 400 words. Create an overview of the

Nursing HW

Lesson 2 paper Ayurvedic Medicine a. What is ayurvedic medicine? b. What techniques are specific to ayurvedic medicine? c. What conditions are ayurvedic medicine used for? d. The education, scope of practice, and treatment claims of the practitioners. 1. Use the Internet to further explore Ayurvedic Medicine. 2. Then, write