Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Response 2

200 word response 1 reference/intext citation

Due 1/24/2025

Amrita

Explain how Utilitarianism works differently than
Social Contract Theory and if Utilitarianism would result in a different conclusion if the administrative agency is acting ethical or not in passing such a new regulation.   

Social Contract Theory in Ethics suggests that moral rules and duties arise from rational individuals’ agreements to live cooperatively in society. These rules are designed to ensure fairness, security, and the well-being of all members based on mutual agreements. Ethical principles derive from what individuals agree to in a hypothetical state of nature or through a social contract.

Application of Social Contract Theory to the SNAP Fast Food Expansion:

1.
Stakeholders:

·
SNAP recipients: Low-income individuals relying on food assistance.

·
Taxpayers: Fund the SNAP program through taxes.

·
Health advocates: Concerned about the public health impacts of fast food.

·
Fast food companies Could financially benefit from SNAP coverage.

·
The general public May face higher health costs due to unhealthy diets.

2.
Social Contract Analysis:

·
Rational individuals would agree to policies that protect public health and ensure all well-being, particularly vulnerable populations.

·
While expanding SNAP to cover fast food may benefit recipients in the short term, it could encourage unhealthy eating and lead to higher public health costs. This would impose an unfair burden on taxpayers, undermining the fairness of the social contract.

·
The goal of SNAP should be to provide nutritious food to support long-term health, not subsidize unhealthy eating habits.

3.
Consequences of Expanding SNAP to Cover Fast Food:

·
Health Concerns: Fast food is linked to poor health outcomes like obesity and heart disease.

·
Taxpayer Burden: Taxpayers would bear the increased healthcare costs from poor diets.

·
Fairness: Expanding SNAP to cover fast food without ensuring healthier food options could be unfair to those relying on government assistance for nutritious food.

Conclusion:

From the perspective of Social Contract Theory, expanding SNAP to cover fast food would not be ethical. A rational social contract would prioritize policies that promote long-term health and fairness. Encouraging fast food consumption would conflict with these goals, leading to higher health risks and unfair burdens on taxpayers. Therefore, the social contract would likely support policies that promote healthier eating, benefiting society.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

correctional system

First, after reading the article, “Preventing Fatal Attractions,” come up with an original suggestion as to how inappropriate relationships between inmates and correctional officers can be stopped. Please note, your suggestion may be creative; however, it should also be realistic. And, your suggestion must not have been discussed in the Worley et

criminal justice

At the end of Courts, Chapter Four (p. 229), there are two very good discussion questions. As these questions so beautifully complement each other, lets look at them both. • How might the development of sentencing guidelines only serve to “structure” unfair sentencing practices?  • Why do some judges believe

Criminal Justice

For reflection notes you are expected to summarize the first half of the “Causes of Delinquency” By Travis Hirschi. It is important to use your critical thinking when writing the summary. Usually, your reflections need to be at least 750 words. At the end, you need to propose some questions.

Week 4

Utilizing your criminal justice prevention program-   1. Identify the crime prevention program you selected as your organization for this class and its goals The University of Mississippi’s Prison-to-College Pipeline Program (PTCPP) 2. Identify which  Types of Costs, located on page 100 of our text, are present in your program. (

Legal Perspectives

Please note case study is below Instructions Here This exercise is designed to provide you the opportunity to demonstrate your comprehensive knowledge of the course material we have studied this semester — frameworks for decision making from legal perspectives — and to apply your knowledge to a practical scenario. The

Discussion 2

Explain how mass incarceration and differential opportunity structures influence “Coerced Mobility Theory”? Do you believe conflict theories have more or less relevance today? Why or why not? 

Week 3 Discussion – Compliance and Regulations

During a disaster certain assets must be protected. For industrial companies, this is not only for the company, but also for the surrounding community. Read the article on industrial safety after hurricane Harvey, Industrial Safety After Hurricane HarveyLinks to an external site.. First, pick a recent disaster, such as fire,

Discussion 14: Conclusion: Frontiers of Criminal Justice Policy Evaluation

 In our final module, we considered the road ahead: the future of criminal justice policy. Mears offers a cautiously optimistic tone, noting that although the contemporary state of criminal justice policy exhibits numerous causes for concern, there are also many opportunities for improvement. He concludes with his recommendations for more

Power point

4 questions on a power point Develop a PowerPoint presentation that covers the assigned questions. Make sure you are citing the relevant readings from this course, but you may also incorporate readings from previous courses in the master’s program. Ensure your slides are clear, concise, and visually engaging. 1. Explain

7

please view attachment, 1. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), define the customer orientation theory. 2. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), define the quality function deployment technique. 3. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), explain the dual roll of criminal justice services. 4. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019),

Discussion 13: Cost-Efficiency Evaluations, Part II

  In this module, we continue to explore and apply the lessons of cost-efficiency evaluations. The two supplements for this module offer interesting insights. First, Mansson and colleagues (2022) discuss cost efficiency in Swedish courts; their work offers some important lessons for CJ institutions everywhere. Second, Mears (2019) returns to

Court Process

Please check these references for me. I have provided this outline of how I would like this paper to be structured. THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!! MINIMUM 4 PAGES, NOT COUNTING TITLE AND REFERENCE PAGES, DOUBLE-SPACED, REFERENCES APA FORMAT. INCLUDE AS MANY SPECIFIC LEGAL ISSUES AND DETAILS  Case: The Murder of

Responses

Responses 1. The assumptions of control theories vary from the theories we previously discussed in the book. The control theory is the belief that an individual has full control over what they say and do. If a person has strong social bonds in their society, they are less likely to

White Collar Summary

Topic: White Collar Summary Assignment Our last forum this semester will focussing on summarizing what we have learned these past few months. In your discussion, summarize your understanding of the following: Which white collar crimes do you feel are the most damaging to society and why do you feel this

HLSS502 week 8 final

Read attachment for assignment  Instructions Please complete each of the essay questions below: Essay 1: The Department of Homeland Security has the goal to apply risk management principles to homeland security operations and has stated that “Ultimately, homeland security is about effectively managing risks to the Nation’s security” (DHS, 2010,