Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Response 2

200 word response 1 reference/intext citation

Due 1/24/2025

Amrita

Explain how Utilitarianism works differently than
Social Contract Theory and if Utilitarianism would result in a different conclusion if the administrative agency is acting ethical or not in passing such a new regulation.   

Social Contract Theory in Ethics suggests that moral rules and duties arise from rational individuals’ agreements to live cooperatively in society. These rules are designed to ensure fairness, security, and the well-being of all members based on mutual agreements. Ethical principles derive from what individuals agree to in a hypothetical state of nature or through a social contract.

Application of Social Contract Theory to the SNAP Fast Food Expansion:

1.
Stakeholders:

·
SNAP recipients: Low-income individuals relying on food assistance.

·
Taxpayers: Fund the SNAP program through taxes.

·
Health advocates: Concerned about the public health impacts of fast food.

·
Fast food companies Could financially benefit from SNAP coverage.

·
The general public May face higher health costs due to unhealthy diets.

2.
Social Contract Analysis:

·
Rational individuals would agree to policies that protect public health and ensure all well-being, particularly vulnerable populations.

·
While expanding SNAP to cover fast food may benefit recipients in the short term, it could encourage unhealthy eating and lead to higher public health costs. This would impose an unfair burden on taxpayers, undermining the fairness of the social contract.

·
The goal of SNAP should be to provide nutritious food to support long-term health, not subsidize unhealthy eating habits.

3.
Consequences of Expanding SNAP to Cover Fast Food:

·
Health Concerns: Fast food is linked to poor health outcomes like obesity and heart disease.

·
Taxpayer Burden: Taxpayers would bear the increased healthcare costs from poor diets.

·
Fairness: Expanding SNAP to cover fast food without ensuring healthier food options could be unfair to those relying on government assistance for nutritious food.

Conclusion:

From the perspective of Social Contract Theory, expanding SNAP to cover fast food would not be ethical. A rational social contract would prioritize policies that promote long-term health and fairness. Encouraging fast food consumption would conflict with these goals, leading to higher health risks and unfair burdens on taxpayers. Therefore, the social contract would likely support policies that promote healthier eating, benefiting society.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Discussion 1

Answer these questions. No MORE than 2 pages. APA Publication 7 formatting and to reference sources when appropriate.  A minimum of two academic/professional references; Title Page and Abstract not required.  1. What has changed over time as it relates to Victim Rights?   2. Locate and read the constitutional amendments for victims’ rights

book review

book review Instructional Expectations for Book Reviews The first and most important step in completing your book reviews is the thoughtful selection of your reading material. I strongly encourage you to approach this assignment strategically by establishing a thematic focus for your course readings. Developing a consistent theme allows you

week 1 discussion

answer questions 1 5 week 1 discussion 250 words minimum Respond to the following questions: · How have state and local officials politicized the immigration debate? · What impact has the media had on the issue? · How has this affected local law enforcement?

CJ 340 Project Three

Please see the attached below for assignment details. Project Three Guidelines and Rubric.html CJ 340 Project Three Guidelines and Rubric Competency In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency: Apply theory when analyzing incidences of criminal behavior Scenario You are a Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

7-2 Project Two

Please see the attached below for assignment details. Criminological Theory Applied 1 3 Criminological Theory Applied [ Note: To complete this template, replace the bracketed text with your own content. Remove this note before you submit your paper.] Criminological Theory Applied Project Two [Your Name] Southern New Hampshire University CJ

7-1 Practice Activity: Theory and Ethics

Please see the attached below for assignment details. Module Seven Practice Activity Guidelines and Rubric.html CJ 340 Module Seven Practice Activity Guidelines and Rubric Overview In this practice activity, you will choose a criminological theory you believe explains a particular criminal behavior, and then assess whether the applied theory is

Katherine

Instructions for Paper Title: Recruitment, Selection, and Retention Due Date: 12/18/28 Paper Length: 5-6 pages *** If possible, reference Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act, reviewing federal employment governing recruitment and hiring I will also attach some articles that may be helpful to you. Assignment Requirements: For this

Law – Criminal Module Six Assignment

Please see attached below. Module Six Assignment Guidelines and Rubric.html CJ 340 Module Six Assignment Guidelines and Rubric Overview In this assignment, you will explain how cultural views and values drive human behavior, and explain the importance of applying theory versus making broad generalizations to explain behaviors. Prompt In Module

Sab 10

Will the death penalty ever be abolished in all jurisdictions in the United States? If yes, what will cause its abolition?

DB Response

Please see attached. Bryan Saunders    The scriptures quoted largely confirm my views about how criminal procedure should operate, witnesses, physical evidence, and cross-examination should build in strong safeguards to protect from wrongful convictions. In Deuteronomy it is clear that a single witness in never enough to establish guilt especially

crj 331 wk5

what is the comparison of  forensic psychologist in criminal and civil proceedings? CRJ331: A Defendant’s Journey Activity Overview: In this activity you explored a defendant’s journey through a typical criminal legal proceeding and examined the possible points of intersection with a forensic psychologist. In your readings this week you also

DB Response

See attached. CJUS 410 Discussion Assignment Instructions You will complete 4 Discussions in this course. You will post one thread of at least 300 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday day of the assigned Module: Week. You must then post 2 replies of at least 150 words by 11:59

replies

reply to discussion post 2 100 words each reply 510 discussion 1 reply 1 brandon ***In your responses, challenge your peers using an opposing position, explaining why the justifications discussed are ethical and logical. The institution of prisons has historically been justified through four primary rationales: retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and

Assistance 9

See attachment Topic: Does Staffing Shortages Intensify the Harmful Effects of Overcrowding in U.S. Correctional Facilities Propose a potential research project. A research proposal offers a description of the design of your study, and includes a review of the relevant theoretical, empirical, and methodological literature in your area. In general,

final

2 The Final Exam is worth 120 points and focuses on content in Weeks 5-8, with the ability to apply concepts related to the Masters and Ethical Schools covered in Week 2. The exam is comprised of three (3) essay questions, worth 40 points each. It is an open-book exam

Criminal Justice

For the term paper, your need to choose a topic about one aspect of capital punishment. After choosing the topic you should pick one of the perspectives that we cover in the class. You need to use scholarly materials to support your statements. The final product will be a 7-9