Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

ARTICLE REVIEW

Need help completing

Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

Page 4 of 4

Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

You will write an article review, relevant to this week’s learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points. The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

Reference.Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:

· A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

· The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

· A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don’t know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

· The purpose of the present study

· The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

· State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

· What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

· Why was it important to publish these ideas?

Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:

· The
participants and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

· The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

· A description of the
tools/measuresused and research design employed.

· A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:

· Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

· A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

· If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

· If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted “stand alone” (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

Discussion. The discussion is where the author “wraps up the research”. This section should include:

· A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

· Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

· A discussion of how the author’s findings compares to those found in prior research

· The limitations of the study

· The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

Critique.

In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
your impressionsand the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

· Were the findings important to a reader?

· Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

· If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

Conclusion.

Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

APA Format Review

If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

Grading Criteria

I will grade your paper based upon:

· How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

· How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

· How accurately you used APA format

· your organization, grammar, and spelling

· Integration of assigned weekly readings

image1.gif

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Diversity Research Article Critique

The lack of diversity in psychology research can cause many problems. Some can be seen in culturally biased aspects of the DSM-5 to research that should only be applied to small population subsets rather than general statements about all individuals. Since much of psychology research aims to make general statements

Dream Ass

Tips for remembering your dreams 1. What you think about and do in the time right before you go to sleep affects not only what you dream but also your ability to remember your dreams. Have you ever had an important appointment the next morning and so you fell asleep

Psychology Assignment week two

Need help with my assignment Assignment 2 Throughout this course, you will explore two critical components of your doctoral journey—the social problem and the research problem. The two are inevitably linked but also separate components of your research. You started to explore the differences between the social problem and the

Intro to psychology HW

Researchers often use a method called an experiment to study the causes of human and animal behavior. Design such an experiment based on a change in behavior you have observed in yourself or your roommates this past semester (e.g., eating or sleeping habits, exercise regime, game playing, etc.). Select a

How can I make a digital genogram without using complicated software?

I need to create a digital genogram for a class project in psychology, but most of the software I’ve found so far seems too complicated or requires a paid subscription. Is there a simple and user-friendly way to make a genogram online without having to download bulky or expensive software?

Questions

See attachments Answer the questions below using the document attached: There is no specific page limit to the assignment, but the answers MUST be single-spaced WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. MUST be typed, with 1” margins throughout the document. 12-point, Times New Roman Font. Questions

Article

Article  Choose one of the assessments_ Need 12:00 PM Monday September 15th, 2025 Week 5: Chapter 12 and 13 – Rorschach Inkblot Method Test Critique Papers: These will be listed under Paper Assignments Tab 1-2 pages in length. You can choose one test that was studied that week and critique

Prof Double R

  Choose a specific health behavior that you would like to set as a goal for yourself or for someone else, and develop a strategy or program for change. First, briefly describe the specific health behavior you are addressing and why you are addressing this behavior (e.g., your own attitudes,

MSW 531 MODULE 2

  Chapter 2 of Ferraro and Wilmoth (2013)  What Is Aging? Biological Changes   Why Do We Age?  ******************************************  Geriatric Syndromes    Chapter 14 of Ferraro and Wilmoth (2013 

PSYCHOLOGY

  Upload your graph(s) illustrating relationships between personality  characteristics (extraversion or neuroticism) and the compulsive  internet use scale here. This assignment counts towards your Qualtrics  homework grade, which amounts to 24% of the final course grade. Follow along with this video to make a scatterplot: Then watch this video to

PSY Week 10

  Select ONE of the prompts below to respond to in this week’s discussion. Describe Erikson’s eighth stage, integrity vs. despair, in detail. What can nurses do if they have a patient who is experiencing despair during Erikson’s 8th stage of development? Also, include information on how generativity may be

home work

Please follow instructions. No AI You must post before seeing replies. Edit history will be available to instructors. Due Sep 10 65 points 7 Replies (7) View Split Screen All Search entries or author… Newest First  Back to Week at a Glance ( MEASUREMENT OF CONCEPTUAL VARIABLES Last week,

Assistance II

See attachments Answer the questions below using the document attached: There is no specific page limit to the assignment, but the answers MUST be single-spaced WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. MUST be typed, with 1” margins throughout the document. 12-point, Times New Roman Font. Questions

Discussion 1

Discussion 1: Weeks 1-3 Discussion 1 is based on content from Module 1 (Weeks 1-3) and contains 5 questions. Part A, B, and C are mandatory, and Part B requires citations (total of 1 citation).  You should also respond to two classmate’s posts. In order to ensure you receive the grade

PE Week 3 Discussion 2

To prepare: Review this week’s Learning Resources, especially the Wilder Research (2009) article, “Program Theory and Logic Models.” Consider the information contained in your team’s Request for Proposal. Post an explanation of how you would determine an appropriate program theory/conceptual framework to characterize a program. Explain what kind of information you

PE Week 3 Assignment 2

To prepare for this Assignment: Reflect on this week’s experiences with your team. Assignment Complete your journal entry for this week in your Personal Journal, reflecting on your experiences with the team process for this week. How is it going? What are you learning about yourself? What are you learning

Gloria tapes fall 2025

Gloria Tapes Critique Instructions Fall 2025 Review/Critique of the “Gloria Tapes” (100 points) The link is provided in the question. You will write a critical review of each therapeutic approach presented in this summary of therapy sessions. There are 3 therapists who treat Gloria. This will need to be 5-7