Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

ARTICLE REVIEW

Need help completing

Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

Page 4 of 4

Article Review Instructions: Please Read Carefully

You will write an article review, relevant to this week’s learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points. The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

Reference.Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:

· A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

· The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

· A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don’t know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

· The purpose of the present study

· The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

· State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

· What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

· Why was it important to publish these ideas?

Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:

· The
participants and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

· The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

· A description of the
tools/measuresused and research design employed.

· A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:

· Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

· A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

· If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

· If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted “stand alone” (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

Discussion. The discussion is where the author “wraps up the research”. This section should include:

· A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

· Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

· A discussion of how the author’s findings compares to those found in prior research

· The limitations of the study

· The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

Critique.

In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
your impressionsand the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

· Were the findings important to a reader?

· Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

· If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

Conclusion.

Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

APA Format Review

If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

Grading Criteria

I will grade your paper based upon:

· How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

· How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

· How accurately you used APA format

· your organization, grammar, and spelling

· Integration of assigned weekly readings

image1.gif

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

pysc

Write the paper how a entry level college student would write it You have been given a grant to study one of these five personality traits: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. ● Define and describe the personality trait you chose. ● How might this personality trait be

JASP HELP

Help with understanding JASP data. manifest.json { “jaspArchiveVersion” : “5”, “jaspVersion” : “0.95.4” } analyses.json { “analyses” : [], “autoSaveDescription” : “cf_grit_data.jasp autosaved<br>Full path: <code>C:/Users/16785/Downloads/cf_grit_data.jasp</code>”, “autoSaveFileName” : “cf_grit_data.jasp”, “meta” : null } index.html Results internal.sqlite

Podcast Analysis

2 For this assignment, you’ll take a good long walk in your new expert shoes. In doing so, you’ll prove to yourself that you have rightfully earned your place as a knowledgeable scholar of psychology. No longer a student, but a self-assured graduate who remains curious, humble, and open to

Discussion 5

 Define each of the differential reinforcement procedures, noting how the two components of each procedure affect the occurrence of problem and desired behaviors. Then, choose a personal behavior, or the behavior of someone in your environment (maintaining confidentiality, of course!). Choose a Differential Reinforcement procedure and explain how you would

Ethnic Diversity in Research

Critique Current Research on Child Development. Week 7 Required Resources · Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research Zamora, I., Williams, M. E., & Higareda, M. (2016). Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research.  Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 698–703.

resp 3

attached Response to your classmate: Post 2- Self-management. Another evidence-based intervention that can be used in a school setting is self-management intervention. Smith et al. (2022) found positive results in a systematic review for the self-management procedures in all grades, improving behaviors and students’ academic growth. A self-management procedure will

resp 4

attched Response to your classmate Post 1: One effective RTI strategy is progress monitoring. This approach helps teachers keep track of how well students are learning after an intervention begins. It involves using short and frequent checks such as reading or math assessments to measure improvement over time. For instance,

dis 2

attached Rules for Discussion 2 – RTI and EBP  Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts and 2 replies.  Canvas often groups posts and I will respond to posts of the same topic. So, I may not be able to respond to each and every post,

Psychology

Write the paper how a entry level college student would write it You have been given a grant to study one of these five personality traits: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. ● Define and describe the personality trait you chose. ● How might this personality trait be

week 3 discussion program

  Now that you have selected one measurable outcome from your logic model (Week 2), this week we will determine how the evaluation will be conducted and who will be included in it. For this discussion, address the following: 1. Outcome Being Evaluated State one short-term or intermediate outcome from

DQ

see attached Discussion Board #8: Informative Speech Organization Examples LAST WEEK:  You browsed through examples of informative presentations to get a sense of the presenter’s type of speech, subject choice, and purpose. Now, we’ll use the organizational information introduced during the PK presentations to build your understanding of how presentations

Yes or NO

see attached  Read Cluster 14 in your text as well as the cluster 14 power point. Then submit your typed response to the Homework assignment by the due date listed. Homework Yes or No Do you think homework should be assigned? Whether you say yes or no, provide an explanation

L&CP Week 3 Assignment

Instructions Respond to the following questions. What is the importance, if any, of officer intent and motive in the “objective standard of reasonable force” under the current state of the law? Contrast the definition of probable cause with that of reasonable suspicion. Complete the following questions: Compare and contrast Fourth

Controversial Treatments Chelation Therapy

  1 Controversial Treatments: Reflection Paper and Video Presentation Liadanay Velazquez Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Capella University PSY7710: Ethics in Applied Behavior Analysis Instructor Name Assignment Due Date Controversial Treatments: Reflection Paper and Video Presentation (Please note, all italicized writing in this template is for instructional purposes. You

psychology

PSYC 320 Behavior Modification Project: Baseline Phase Report Assignment Instructions Overview To assess your baseline as you begin the experiment, you need to observe your target behavior before you ever treat it or try to modify it – in other words do not change anything you do. Thus, you will

psych brain functioning (Les)

Module 3: Critical Thinking/Application Prompts     Instructions Each week, you will be presented with a series of critical thinking prompts and application prompts. Please copy/paste the prompts into an offline document (Word, for example) and compose your responses offline (be sure to save your work).  Then click on the “Submit

Psychology week two assignment

  Hi Barbara, Nice start with clear outcomes. As you draft Section 1 of your assignment, just remember to include some credible statistics describing the scope of the problem the program addresses.

Feedback keiland

       If the CHANCE program were highly successful, success would mean that adolescents who are survivors of human trafficking experience lasting emotional healing, safety, and self-sufficiency. Youth would show stronger self-worth, consistent school or job engagement, and the ability to form trusting relationships with supportive adults. Families and foster caregivers