Please following the desperation below an don’t use AI please
Select ANY unpublished or published primary source relating to military or diplomatic history. Please verify with instructor that the document you have chosen meets these criteria. You goal is to establish the PROVENANCE of the primary source to the best of your ability and evaluate the 6 utility of the primary source as a piece of historical evidence. To accomplish this, write an approximately 4–5-page paper (excluding appended primary source) addressing each of the following elements. Write a succinct 1-3 paragraph synopsis of each of the following elements of the source’s PROVENANCE. YOU MUST APPEND A COPY OF THE PRIMARY SOURCE DOCUMENT TO YOUR SOURCE ANALYSIS. 1. WHO. Who authored the document? Was it an individual, if so, who? If collectively written, who wrote it together? Identify the author to the best of your ability and provide as much pertinent information about the author that will help shed light on why they might have written the document. If this is a published primary source, additionally answer WHO published it? How does who published it impact what is being said or how it is being presented in publication? 2. WHAT? What is the document? What kind of document is it? What is/are the author(s) trying to say? 3. WHY? Why do you think the author(s) wrote the document and/or why do you think the publisher published it (if a published primary source). 4. WHEN? When was the document written and/or published? These may not be the same dates. Why is knowing when this document was written and/or published important in helping to understand what it is saying? 5. WHERE? Where was the document written? If published primary source, where was it published? How might where it was written and where it was published impact its message? 6. UTILITY? What value does this document have as historical evidence? Can it be taken entirely at face value? Does it have bias? If so, what is this bias and how can you adjust for this bias? What is its utility and its limitations? How could you use it as historical evidence? How, when, and where might you not want to or be able to use it
