Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

final

JOURNAL ENTRY #2

On any given day, a nurse can play a pivotal role in someone’s life. Experienced nurses often share stories of previous experiences and draw
  upon these experiences when circumstances warrant.

Hence, reflection can be a valuable tool. It serves as a tool for not only recalling experiences but also for applying lessons learned from those experiences. Keeping a nursing journal provides these benefits and more.

 

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. 
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

TO PREPARE

· Refer to the current Clinical Guidelines found in this week’s Learning Resources and consider how these guidelines inform your clinical experience.

· Refer to your FNP or AGPCNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form you submitted in Week 1, and consider how your self-assessment might inform your Assignment.

· Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek and reflect on Weeks 6–10 of your clinical experience, and reflect on your observations and experiences with patients during this time.

Journal Entry #2 (600words):

In your journal entry, answer the following questions:

Learning and Experiences

Reflect on the 3 most challenging patient (in obgyn clinic ) encounters and discuss what was most challenging for each.

· What did you learn from this experience?

· What resources did you have available?

· What evidence-based practice did you use for this patient?

· What new skills are you learning?

· What would you do differently?

· How are you managing patient flow and volume?

Communicating and Feedback

Ask yourself the following self-reflective questions:

· How might I improve on my skills and knowledge, and how do I communicate that back to my Preceptor?

· How am I doing? What is missing?

· What type of feedback am I receiving from my Preceptor?

BY DAY 7

Submit your Journal Entry #2 Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
WK11Journal_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

PRAC_6552_Week11_Journal_Rubric

PRAC_6552_Week11_Journal_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection

30 to >29.0 pts

Excellent

Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.

29 to >19.0 pts

Good

Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.

19 to >9.0 pts

Fair

Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections made through explanations and/or examples.

9 to >0 pts

Poor

Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth

30 to >29.0 pts

Excellent

Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.

29 to >19.0 pts

Good

Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.

19 to >9.0 pts

Fair

Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.

9 to >0 pts

Poor

Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication and Feedback

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

Clearly and completely reflects on communication skills and communication improvement and feedback implementation strategies with Preceptor.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

Clearly reflects on communication skills and explains communication improvement and feedback implementation strategies with Preceptor.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

Relfection of communication skills is vague or strategies for communication improvement and feedback implementation are vague or incomplete.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

Relfection of communication skills is incomplete or missing, and/or strategies for communication improvement and feedback implementation are poorly developed or missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting

15 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.

14 to >10.0 pts

Good

Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

10 to >5.0 pts

Fair

Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

5 to >0 pts

Poor

Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

No APA errors

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains 1–2 APA errors

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains 3–5 APA errors

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains >5 APA errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

nur521

I need assistance with a question  Realistic Treatment Plan For this assignment, you will develop a realistic clinical case presentation. Use PowerPoint to create the slides for your presentation.  Do not use the notes section for rubric information, as it will not be graded; all information must be included in

Qualitative Journal

Qualitative Journal Club: Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the various components of a qualitative research study and methodology. Instructions: For this discussion, please complete the following: 1. Complete the Qualitative Journal Club Template in a Word document 1. At the top of the template provide an APA

HEALTH ASSESSMENT

   Reflection questions 1. The patient was newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. What social determinants of health (SDOH) should the nurse assess for that could impact the patient’s ability for diabetes self-management? 2. What are some environmental and/or individual factors that could impact the patient’s ability for diabetes self-management? 

Week 6

please see attached    Assignment: Research an article on Crisis or Disasters, summarize the article and create a care plan for a person in Crisis in the discussion post.  Article:Impact of  Crisis  Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness and/or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review  • 2024 Introduction: 

Compp

Using the  Windshield Survey,  while in your community, you will assess the community location. This will lead to a list of identified, prioritized health needs and your recommendations for intervention. You will complete a windshield survey of your community. The objective of a windshield survey is to assess a community

Case study

help with 1-2 case study In 1 -2 pages, answer the questions below in detail. You must use current evidence-based resources to support your answers. Follow APA guidelines. and the grading rubric. Chief Compliant: Mrs. Lin Zhang is a 52-year-old Chinese-American woman who presents with chronic lower back pain, bilateral knee

Nursing Literature Review & Evidence Matrix Assignment

will attached instructions in notepad Evidence Matrix Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________ Author Journal Name/ Year of Publication Research Design Sample Size Outcome Variables Measured Quality (A, B, C) Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to

Discussion

Case Presentation-PowerPoint Presentation Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case that was seen during your experience or a topic that is of interest to you. 1. Select a health problem that primarily affect the older adult population. Topic: Rheumatoid Arthritis. 2. Provide information about the incidence, prevalence, and pathophysiology

MOdule 4 Pharm

Describe causes of Upper respiratory infections and drug therapy  Discuss triggers of asthma and treatment options Discuss corticosteroids  Describe chronic bronchitis and treatment options Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment recommendations Discuss symptoms of GERD, complications, and drug management Compare and contrast Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative colitis

Assessment

See attached for instructions 1 Assessment 04 – Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care Create a 5-10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you will propose an evidence- based plan to improve the outcomes the patient in the provided case study below, and examine how remote collaboration provided

WK 9 DISC

3   Back to Week at a Glance Ethics, Cyber Ethics, and Security In recent years, hackers have targeted medical records, from hospitals and other healthcare institutions, across the country. These records contain personal information, contact information, and most importantly, for the hackers, information that may prove useful in stealing

Professional Portfolio

Daniela Padron 786-461-0734 [email protected] Opa-locka, FL 33055 CONTACT SKILLS Organized• Team Player• Critical Thinking skills• Time management• Punctual• Hard working• Decision Making• Creative Problem Solving• Blood Draw and Sample Collection • Clinical judgment• Vitals monitoring• Spanish/English Fluency• Dedicated and compassionate Registered Nurse (RN) with progressive career history in direct patient

Comproimp

briefly describe one community health problem from your community’s health improvement plan. What structure, process, and outcome standards would you use to evaluate a program addressing this problem?

SOAP

need to come up with a SOAP note following this specific algorithm. Instructions will be provided. 

Discussion post/case study

Topic: What is the Impact of using teach back to educate Latino men on the importance of lifestyle changes, exercise and medication adherence to blood pressure medication?