Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

psy snh

Overview

In the Module Five discussion, you stated your proposed
design for your capstone project research proposal. This included your chosen
method, design, and data-collection instruments along with the reason behind
each. For Milestone Three, you will build on your proposed design to develop a
complete paper that discusses all aspects of the method, design, and data for
your proposal. Research design is a major section of the capstone research
proposal. Completing this milestone will provide you with a solid foundation
for your capstone project. Refer to the Module Five
and Six resources for more detailed information on research design. Review the
Final Project Guidelines and Rubric and the Final Project and Milestone
Alignment Guide to see how the critical elements in this milestone prepare you
to meet the final project requirements and course outcomes used to evaluate
your final capstone project.

 

The final project is meant for you to propose a hypothetical
study. You are not and should not be conducting human-subject research for this
project. It is not necessary for this assignment. All human-subject research
requires written approval from the SNHU COCE Institutional Review Board to
protect the welfare and ensure ethical treatment of the subjects.

 

Prompt

Write a five- to seven-page paper in which you describe the
methodology, design, and data management tools you plan to use in your research
proposal. Define the process from the selection of participants (and
stakeholders, as applicable) through data collection to data analysis,
including any limitations and assumptions. Provide a detailed plan to collect
and analyze data and disseminate findings. Include all ethical considerations.
Your paper should give a complete description of the entire process used to
conduct the study. If your proposal involves implementation of interventions,
then include a program evaluation component that describes your research
design.

 

In your submission, be sure to include the following
critical elements:

 

State the chosen research method or methods used.

Are they qualitative, quantitative, or both?

Provide support of method selection. Discuss why the chosen
method or methods are best for the research topic or evaluation of the
intervention.

Justify your choice of method, design, sampling, data
collection, analysis, and overall process with logic and evidence.

Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the
research design. Explain why it is the best design for the proposed
study or evaluation. Support your explanation with logic and specific evidence.

Select valid and reliable data-collection tools for the research questions (and research design). If you develop
data-collection tools, explain how validity and reliability will be determined.

Support the selection of the population and sampling
procedures.

Describe data collection. Describe the process used to
collect data from recruitment to consent to data collection. Include ethical
considerations and mitigation. Include how you will handle the following:

Recruiting and managing study participants

Eliminating or mitigating any chance of harm to participants

Data handling, storage, and access

Handling consent, management of data, and requests to
withdraw

Protecting confidentiality for the entire life of the data

Explain the proposed data-analysis process, including the
following:

Any transcription and transformation of data for analysis

Use of tools, including software, for analysis

Select and provide justification for use of statistical
analysis and/or processes for qualitative analysis.

Discuss methods for ensuring reliability of qualitative
analysis if applicable.

Explain the limitations and assumptions connected to the
research.

Identify potential limitations and delimiters to be used.

Describe proposed dissemination of findings. Propose how
findings will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders, users, and interested
parties.

Include any plans for presentation and publication of
material.

Fully explain the ethical considerations that apply to the
proposal or intervention.

Identify the ethical considerations associated with the
individuals, communities, and organizations most likely to be affected by the
identified gap or problem.

Articulation of Response: Ensure the submission has no major
errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax.

What to Submit

Your paper must be submitted as a five- to seven-page Word
document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins,
and at least three sources cited in APA format.

 

Milestone Three Rubric

Criteria Meets
Expectations (100%)       In Progress
(80%)            Does Not Meet
Expectations (0%)          Value

Research Method(s)      States
chosen research method or methods used and whether they are qualitative,
quantitative, or both      States chosen
research method or methods used but errs in
determination of type    Does not state
chosen research method or methods used and whether they are qualitative,
quantitative, or both   8

Support of Method(s)    Discusses
why the chosen method or methods are best for the research topic or evaluation
of the intervention  Discusses why the
chosen method or methods are best for the research topic or evaluation of the intervention but discussion is unconvincing or there are
gaps in logic             Does not discuss
why the chosen method or methods are best for the research topic or evaluation
of the intervention 9

Strengths and Weaknesses       Assesses
the strengths and weaknesses of the research design and why it is the best
design for the proposed study or evaluation of the intervention   Assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the
research design and why it is the best design for the proposed study or
evaluation of the intervention but assessment is cursory or there are gaps in
logic             Does not assess the
strengths and weaknesses of the research design and why it is the best design
for the proposed study or evaluation of the intervention              10

Data-Collection Tools  Selects
valid and reliable data-collection tools for the research questions (and
research design) or develops data-collection tools and explains how validity
and reliability will be determined                Selects
or develops data-collection tools for the research questions (and research
design) but not all tools are valid or reliable or explanation for how validity
and reliability will be determined has gaps in logic    Does not select valid and reliable data-collection tools for the
research questions (and research design) or develop data-collection tools and
explain how validity and reliability will be determined           10

Population and Sampling Procedures  Supports the selection of the population and sampling procedures                Makes an
attempt to support the selection of the population and sampling
procedures, but additional support would prove beneficial               Does not support the selection of
the population and sampling procedures        10

Data Collection               Describes
the process used to collect data from recruitment to consent to data collection
and includes ethical considerations and mitigation     Describes the process used to collect data from recruitment to
consent to data collection and but does not include ethical considerations and
mitigation or description of process is cursory            Does
not describe the process used to collect data from recruitment to consent to
data collection or include ethical considerations and mitigation   8

Data-Analysis Process Explains
the proposed data-analysis process, including any transcription and
transformation of data for analysis, as well as the use of tools, including
software, for analysis            Explains
the proposed data-analysis process for analysis, but not all required elements
are included         Does not explain the
proposed data-analysis process, including any transcription and transformation
of data for analysis, or the use of tools, including software, for analysis  8

Justification of Statistical Analysis and/or Qualitative
Analysis               Selects and
justifies statistical analysis and/or process for qualitative analysis and
discusses the methods for ensuring reliability of qualitative analysis if
applicable         Selects and justifies
statistical analysis and/or process for qualitative analysis but does not
discuss the methods for ensuring reliability of qualitative analysis if
applicable or justification has gaps in logic                Does
not select and justify statistical analysis and/or process for qualitative
analysis or discuss the methods for ensuring reliability of qualitative
analysis if applicable     8

Limitations and Assumptions  Explains
the limitations and assumptions connected to the research Explains the limitations and assumptions
connected to the research, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies                Does not explain the limitations
and assumptions connected to the research 8

Dissemination of Findings         Proposes
how the findings will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders, users, and
interested parties Proposes
how the findings will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders, users, and
interested parties, but approach will not be effective for all stakeholders and
parties Does not propose how the findings
will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders, users, and interested parties 8

Ethical Considerations Fully
explains the ethical considerations that apply to the research proposal or
intervention      Partially
explains the ethical considerations of the research proposal or intervention Does not explain the ethical considerations of
the research proposal or intervention     8

Articulation of Response            Submission
has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization      Submission has minor
errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization with
room for improvement Submission has major
errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

ENGL205 WEEK2

NEED TONIGHT For this week’s discussion, choose either The Inferno or “The Dream of the Rood.” Using one specific scene in either work, explain how a Christian view of heroism considers and responds to the ancient problem of sin and our need for redemption. All posts should be grounded in

ES-1 C

READ THE ATTACHMENT!!! Clarifying Your Values Examples of Personal Values Action orientation Humility Altruism authority Initiative Compassion Innovation Competence Moderation Conformity Novelty Creativity Obedience Customer satisfaction Order power Diversity Promise keeping Equality Respect Excitement Risk taking Experimentation Security Fairness/justice Self-discipline Flexibility/adaptability Success status Freedom Teamwork Harmony Tradition Helpfulness Wealth (personal

revision

revision worksheet for the Toulmin essay Instructions: Use the revision paper to answer these questions. I have attached the original paper you did for me. Use this paper to answer these questions. This revision worksheet has three parts. Part One (33% of grade): Address the following two prompts in informal paragraphs

W_1301_MM

Need help with a question Stewart-Steele 1 Professor Stewart-Steele English 1301 MWP #3 Mind Map Instructions Purpose: Mapping out your ideas helps with the writing process, and for some, seeing that process visually helps with organization. Before diving into writing, you will spend some time collecting your thoughts and how

wk 2 045 (Perr)

Part A 045 Regarding the short story “Evil Robot Monkey,” by Mary Robinette Kowal, at the bottom of this sheet, write a strong Thesis Statement for a larger essay. You won’t write that full essay for me, but I need to know that you understand how to set one up. 

English Musings Assignment 7

to an external site.  SpMgt 567: Musings Assignment 7 Assignment Directions: 1. For this assignment, please respond to the following question in a 1-page paper. Please use 12-point, Times New Roman font. Please double-space your answer. Please submit your paper in either .doc or .docx format. Please do not submit

english 111 wk 2 (Nic)

Assignment 2.1 Thesis Statements Choose one of the following activities to complete for this assignment. 2.1a – Thesis Statements Mad Libs Using Mad Libs is an interesting and fun way to learn the essential components of sentence structure for kids. However, we can also use them to learn and understand

English

Prewriting for the Toulmin Essay 1. What are five favorite movies, books, games, or TV shows? · The Shawshank Redemption (film) · Black Panther (film) · The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho (book) · The Last of Us (video game) · Breaking Bad (TV show) 2. Choosing one of these, tell

Poem Analysis

Choose a poem and examine how Aristotle’s definition of rhetoric (the faculty of observing, in each particular case, the available means of persuasion) is encapsulated within the poem. Analyze the structure and meaning of the poem. Include the poet’s biographical information as well as the historical background of the poem.

ACES ASSigh

· Write a 150-word-minimum A.C.E.S. analysis based on the article, “Is it Okay to Be Happy When the World is Falling Apart?” by Avram Alpert.   · Your Prompt:  Read the article carefully and discuss any one of the 3 Rhetorical Appeals that shows up in the article (ethos, pathos, and

E1301_FD

Need help with a question 1 Professor Stewart-Steele English 1301 PAPER #2: Analyzing a Visual Representation of a Culture or Ethnic Group Weight: 20% of Final Grade Length and Formatting: 4-5 pages, typed, double-spaced, with a left-justified margin, and black 12-point Times New Roman font, utilizing APA style. Assignment Preparation:

ENGL205

SEE ATTACHED Week 1 Assignment: Hero Dialogue For this week’s discussion, consider either Achilles in The Iliad or Oedipus in Oedipus the King as ancient “heroes” and address the following questions: · What does the hero do to earn that designation? · What are the benefits and burdens that come

ENG

Work attached INSTRUCTIONS Paper #1 (Exposition) Paper #1 is an exposition. Exposition is a form of writing where the main goal is explanation. It will be your job to find and narrow a topic sufficiently so that an in-depth discussion of it is possible in 5 – 8 pages, research

ML2

READ THE ATTACHMENT!!! Rubric A1:COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES EFFECTIVENESS Competent The evaluation logically describes a business situation where the 2 selected organizational communication strategies are used effectively and are in alignment with the situation. A2:COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES ATTRIBUTES Competent The evaluation logically describes 3 attributes that correlate with 1 of the selected communication

Engl 111-045

“SPACE CAT!” is a mnemonic acronym used in  AP English Language and other rhetorical analysis classes to break down the components of a text. It stands for Speaker, Purpose, Audience, Context, Exigence, and Choices, and Tone, helping students understand the rhetorical situation and the author’s choices. This framework provides a structured way

Public debate 2

Just the annotated bibliography  This file is too large to display.View in new window

harry potter

check instruction pdf file 1. Assignment Overview You are to write a 4-page MLA-formatted essay (or make a 5–7 minute presentation) pretending to be a publisher at Bloomsbury Publishing reviewing the manuscript for Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. Your job is to decide whether to: ● Publish without change,