Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

REFLE 4

ATTACHED

Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
four major sections: the 
Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References (please see 
Purdue University’s APA Style Guide

Links to an external site. for more information).
 Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment’s page.

For this assignment, please consider the following:

What steps will you take to change your use of personal space across a variety of contexts in order to be a better communicator?


IMPORTANT, PROFFESOR NOTE FOR THE fIRST REFLECTION PAPER:


“there is a  technical issue you need to address for your next essays: all direct quotes must be in open and closed quotation marks ” ” from your references to indicate where they begin and end – this is required.   Please be sure to address these issues in your next essays.”

Reflection Assignment Rubric 75

Reflection Assignment Rubric 75

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

30 pts

Excellent

The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples.

24 pts

Good

The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples.

13.5 pts

Acceptable

The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately).

0 pts

Unacceptable

The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reasoning

30 pts

Excellent

The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications.

24 pts

Good

The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications.

13.5 pts

Acceptable

The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications.

0 pts

Unacceptable

The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing, Grammar and Mechanics

15 pts

Excellent

The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

10.5 pts

Good

The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization (4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

7.5 pts

Acceptable

The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

4.5 pts

Unacceptable

The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

15 pts

Total Points: 75

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Prof Double R

COMPLETE THE TEMPLATE BELOW PSY 355 Module Five Milestone Template Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. Part One Apply the foundational concepts of gender schema theory to address each of the following rubric criteria in 2 to 3 sentences: Describe how gender schema theory

Exposure therapy for PtSD

Describe the intervention (what is it meant to impact) and its target population  and the length and format (individual or group therapy, typically) for its delivery. Section Two: ▪ Summarize at least 2 studies that evaluated the intervention with an experimental design that evaluates the intervention quantitatively. These studies should

Annotated Bibliography

For your Signature Assignment for this course, you will submit a written response to a case study, incorporating at least three scholarly sources including your textbook. This week, you will prepare for the Signature Assignment by creating an annotated bibliography. 1. Review the Signature Assignment instructions. The Signature Assignment is

Suicide Prevention

Document the Foundations of a School Suicide Prevention Program Suicide Prevention Since 2000, the only high school in a wealthy, suburban, majority white, community with a population of less than 50,000 has lost 15 current or recent graduates to suicide. In addition, the community has experienced at least three suicide

feedback profssor

 This is a good start. One point to clarify: you mention that the PHQ-A is already part of the TFS intake process, but this isn’t explained or linked to any specific program procedure. If the PHQ-A is indeed used at intake within the particular program you’re evaluating, be sure to

Psyhology 6 Journal

Reflecting on the Week 6 learning resources, what did you find most interesting or meaningful?  Resourse 2 BELOW ONE A LINK FOR Coping, Kelly McGonigal – How to Make Stress Your Friend AND Stress in Adulthood MATERIAL TOPIC FOR WEEK 6 The week’s readings (Managing Health, Stress Scale, Stress in

WEEK 6 Journal

Reflecting on the Week 6 learning resources, what did you find most interesting or meaningful?  Resourse 2 BELOW ONE A LINK FOR Coping, Kelly McGonigal – How to Make Stress Your Friend AND Stress in Adulthood MATERIAL TOPIC FOR WEEK 6 The week’s readings (Managing Health, Stress Scale, Stress in

HUM 5100 Week 2 Anotated Bibliography

see attached Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the  How to Create an Annotated Bibliography video. Additionally, refer to the final project description for your Research Proposal Project final paper in Week 6 to ensure that the articles you are selecting are appropriate for the final project. HUM5100: Week

INTRO TO PSYCH HW

Intro to psychology Stress & Coping emotional, behavioral, and cognitive reactions you usually encounter before and during your exams? In other words, what changes do you notice in your body, emotions, behavior, and thoughts? Psychologists recommend several strategies to cope with stress, including emotional, behavioral, cognitive, emotion-focused, and problem-focused methods.

Why most people get right back into addiction after rehab treatment?

 Real recovery is not like binding yourself to chains to resist cravings for the rest of your life. It’s about knowing and understanding the reasons behind your cravings and using the drugs as an addiction in your life. This involved comprehensive psychiatric diagnosis identify the co-existing mental health disorders and

pysc

Write the paper how a entry level college student would write it You have been given a grant to study one of these five personality traits: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. ● Define and describe the personality trait you chose. ● How might this personality trait be

JASP HELP

Help with understanding JASP data. manifest.json { “jaspArchiveVersion” : “5”, “jaspVersion” : “0.95.4” } analyses.json { “analyses” : [], “autoSaveDescription” : “cf_grit_data.jasp autosaved<br>Full path: <code>C:/Users/16785/Downloads/cf_grit_data.jasp</code>”, “autoSaveFileName” : “cf_grit_data.jasp”, “meta” : null } index.html Results internal.sqlite

Podcast Analysis

2 For this assignment, you’ll take a good long walk in your new expert shoes. In doing so, you’ll prove to yourself that you have rightfully earned your place as a knowledgeable scholar of psychology. No longer a student, but a self-assured graduate who remains curious, humble, and open to

Discussion 5

 Define each of the differential reinforcement procedures, noting how the two components of each procedure affect the occurrence of problem and desired behaviors. Then, choose a personal behavior, or the behavior of someone in your environment (maintaining confidentiality, of course!). Choose a Differential Reinforcement procedure and explain how you would

Ethnic Diversity in Research

Critique Current Research on Child Development. Week 7 Required Resources · Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research Zamora, I., Williams, M. E., & Higareda, M. (2016). Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research.  Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 698–703.

resp 3

attached Response to your classmate: Post 2- Self-management. Another evidence-based intervention that can be used in a school setting is self-management intervention. Smith et al. (2022) found positive results in a systematic review for the self-management procedures in all grades, improving behaviors and students’ academic growth. A self-management procedure will

resp 4

attched Response to your classmate Post 1: One effective RTI strategy is progress monitoring. This approach helps teachers keep track of how well students are learning after an intervention begins. It involves using short and frequent checks such as reading or math assessments to measure improvement over time. For instance,

dis 2

attached Rules for Discussion 2 – RTI and EBP  Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts and 2 replies.  Canvas often groups posts and I will respond to posts of the same topic. So, I may not be able to respond to each and every post,