Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

REFLE 4

ATTACHED

Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
four major sections: the 
Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References (please see 
Purdue University’s APA Style Guide

Links to an external site. for more information).
 Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment’s page.

For this assignment, please consider the following:

What steps will you take to change your use of personal space across a variety of contexts in order to be a better communicator?


IMPORTANT, PROFFESOR NOTE FOR THE fIRST REFLECTION PAPER:


“there is a  technical issue you need to address for your next essays: all direct quotes must be in open and closed quotation marks ” ” from your references to indicate where they begin and end – this is required.   Please be sure to address these issues in your next essays.”

Reflection Assignment Rubric 75

Reflection Assignment Rubric 75

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

30 pts

Excellent

The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples.

24 pts

Good

The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples.

13.5 pts

Acceptable

The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately).

0 pts

Unacceptable

The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reasoning

30 pts

Excellent

The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications.

24 pts

Good

The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications.

13.5 pts

Acceptable

The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications.

0 pts

Unacceptable

The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing, Grammar and Mechanics

15 pts

Excellent

The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

10.5 pts

Good

The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization (4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

7.5 pts

Acceptable

The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

4.5 pts

Unacceptable

The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement.

15 pts

Total Points: 75

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Ethnic Diversity in Research

Critique Current Research on Child Development. Week 7 Required Resources · Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research Zamora, I., Williams, M. E., & Higareda, M. (2016). Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research.  Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 698–703.

resp 3

attached Response to your classmate: Post 2- Self-management. Another evidence-based intervention that can be used in a school setting is self-management intervention. Smith et al. (2022) found positive results in a systematic review for the self-management procedures in all grades, improving behaviors and students’ academic growth. A self-management procedure will

resp 4

attched Response to your classmate Post 1: One effective RTI strategy is progress monitoring. This approach helps teachers keep track of how well students are learning after an intervention begins. It involves using short and frequent checks such as reading or math assessments to measure improvement over time. For instance,

dis 2

attached Rules for Discussion 2 – RTI and EBP  Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts and 2 replies.  Canvas often groups posts and I will respond to posts of the same topic. So, I may not be able to respond to each and every post,

Psychology

Write the paper how a entry level college student would write it You have been given a grant to study one of these five personality traits: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. ● Define and describe the personality trait you chose. ● How might this personality trait be

week 3 discussion program

  Now that you have selected one measurable outcome from your logic model (Week 2), this week we will determine how the evaluation will be conducted and who will be included in it. For this discussion, address the following: 1. Outcome Being Evaluated State one short-term or intermediate outcome from

DQ

see attached Discussion Board #8: Informative Speech Organization Examples LAST WEEK:  You browsed through examples of informative presentations to get a sense of the presenter’s type of speech, subject choice, and purpose. Now, we’ll use the organizational information introduced during the PK presentations to build your understanding of how presentations

Yes or NO

see attached  Read Cluster 14 in your text as well as the cluster 14 power point. Then submit your typed response to the Homework assignment by the due date listed. Homework Yes or No Do you think homework should be assigned? Whether you say yes or no, provide an explanation

L&CP Week 3 Assignment

Instructions Respond to the following questions. What is the importance, if any, of officer intent and motive in the “objective standard of reasonable force” under the current state of the law? Contrast the definition of probable cause with that of reasonable suspicion. Complete the following questions: Compare and contrast Fourth

Controversial Treatments Chelation Therapy

  1 Controversial Treatments: Reflection Paper and Video Presentation Liadanay Velazquez Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Capella University PSY7710: Ethics in Applied Behavior Analysis Instructor Name Assignment Due Date Controversial Treatments: Reflection Paper and Video Presentation (Please note, all italicized writing in this template is for instructional purposes. You

psychology

PSYC 320 Behavior Modification Project: Baseline Phase Report Assignment Instructions Overview To assess your baseline as you begin the experiment, you need to observe your target behavior before you ever treat it or try to modify it – in other words do not change anything you do. Thus, you will

psych brain functioning (Les)

Module 3: Critical Thinking/Application Prompts     Instructions Each week, you will be presented with a series of critical thinking prompts and application prompts. Please copy/paste the prompts into an offline document (Word, for example) and compose your responses offline (be sure to save your work).  Then click on the “Submit

Psychology week two assignment

  Hi Barbara, Nice start with clear outcomes. As you draft Section 1 of your assignment, just remember to include some credible statistics describing the scope of the problem the program addresses.

Feedback keiland

       If the CHANCE program were highly successful, success would mean that adolescents who are survivors of human trafficking experience lasting emotional healing, safety, and self-sufficiency. Youth would show stronger self-worth, consistent school or job engagement, and the ability to form trusting relationships with supportive adults. Families and foster caregivers

psych wk 2 less

Main post (due Friday, November 7, by 11:59 PM):  leslie Please read the following information related to concussions and then answer the questions below: The brain sits in the cranium, surrounded by cerebral fluid. When a severe blow to the head occurs, the brain may collide with the cranium, then

Social Media

I need help understanding the paragraph format Overview In this assignment, you will write a 3–5 page paper on the effects of social media on the developing mind. Preparation Topic Selection Choose one of the following topics: · Internet use among elementary age children (ages 5–11). · Social media use

psychology

Behavior Modification Project: Research Paper Assignment Instructions Overview You will write a 4-6-page, current APA formatted, research paper that will aid you in the Behavior Modification Project. You should reference your textbook and at least 6 additional peer-reviewed empirical research journal articles. The research paper will include a title page,

assitant needed E Kenniqua

Shared Writing: Psychological Disorders One of your authors once attended a training session where the instructor shared that they did not believe in the DSM or in using diagnoses. This person believed that diagnoses were much like rumors in that they had the potential to lead toward specific beliefs and