Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Asssigment

Module 6: 
Clinical Work

Instructions

Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

Clinical Question:

In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis 
(P) is a CT scan 
(I) compared to MRI 
(C) more accurate diagnosing 
(O)TB caverns during patient assessment T?

P = Patient Population – TB Patients

I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

T: Time – Patient assessment

Based on the question above please complete the following:

1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

Use an Essay Format 

· You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

· Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

· Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

· When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

· Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment’s due date.

 

Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Be sure to review the 

academic expectations
 for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. 

·
 Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

– Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning

Development of Ideas

40 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

36 to >32.0 pts

Good

The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

32 to >28.0 pts

Fair

The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

28 to >24.0 pts

Poor

The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

24 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

Mastery

25 to >23.0 pts

Excellent

The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.

23 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.

20 to >18.0 pts

Fair

The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.

18 to >15.0 pts

Poor

The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.

15 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy

Quality of Resources

15 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.

14 to >12.0 pts

Good

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

12 to >11.0 pts

Fair

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

11 to >9.0 pts

Poor

The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.

9 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics, Grammar, and APA

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat

Organization and Presentation of Information

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

·
Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

XC04

XC4004 Implementation of Educational Component of Practice Change Presentation Evaluation Survey What went well? What could have been done better? What did you learn from this training materials? On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the efficacy, usefulness, and clarity of the information presented? Efficacy 1

case study

Week 5 Soap Note Submit a correctly formatted SOAP note on the identified patient type in a Word document. If the identified patient type was not seen during your clinical, please contact your professor for a patient profile. Patient type: Adult Psychiatric – A 30-year-old African American male presented to

case study

Week 596 Case Study Discussion Prompt: Medication Access Explore and analyze various strategies to address the issue of medication access for patients with chronic conditions who lack prescription coverage. Provide a brief assessment of low-cost measures, including financial assistance programs, community resources, and patient education initiatives in your specific clinical

case study

Week 595 Discussion case study Imagine a 64-year-old woman from a different cultural background than the healthcare provider. She has been living with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for two years. She has been taking metformin (2000 mg/day) without any issues. Her BMI is 32 kg/m². She also has high blood

episode#2

Episodic Visit: Dermatology Focused Note Focused Notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect the experiences to the learning you gain from your weekly Learning Resources. Focused Notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient

Nursing NUR 504 Assignment #1

  Comprehensive Mental Health Examination For this assignment, list the parts of a comprehensive mental status examination (MSE) for mental health patients. Give examples of each and describe the significance to the advanced practice nurse.   Submission Instructions · The paper is to be clear and concise and students will

Nursing NUR 601 Assignment #1

  Therapeutic Relationship Case  Cases J.J is a nurse practitioner who works in a primary care facility. He believes that one of the most important aspects of his work is to foster a therapeutic relationship with his clients. He is using effective communication techniques. Many of his clients have altered

home

15 S 21st St., Suite 205 Fargo, ND 58103     BASIC ASSURANCES SYSTEM     Procedure Title: Basic Assurances System  Procedure Type: Service Operations  Number: 10 Original Date Issued: 03/11/2022  Effective Date: 03/11/2022  Approved By: Gibson W. Jerue, CEO  Approved Date: 03/11/2022  Revision Date(s):   Policy Reference: Basic Assurances System    Disability

Nursing Assignment

Directions: Find something that interests you from each of the four chapters (use PowerPoints or textbook). Post a brief share from each chapter that will add to your classmates’ understanding, insight, or future nursing practice. Your post should look approximately like this: Chapter 30: Here is an experience I’ve had

NUR 504 Discussion #1

For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for one of the following cases. Case 1 Chief Complaint  (CC)  “I came for my annual physical exam, but do not want to be a burden to my daughter.”  History of Present

Patient Case Scenario Debate

   response detailing your argument for the following: What is the proposed      mechanism of action of the medication(s)? Why might this be appropriate      for the patients? What are the advantages or      disadvantages to your class of medication (options for different      administration, length of duration, etc.)?

NUR 504

Comprehensive Mental Health Examination For this assignment, list the parts of a comprehensive mental status examination (MSE) for mental health patients. Give examples of each and describe the significance to the advanced practice nurse.   Submission Instructions • The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose

NUR601W1A

J.J is a nurse practitioner who works in a primary care facility. He believes that one of the most important aspects of his work is to foster a therapeutic relationship with his clients. He is using effective communication techniques. Many of his clients have altered sensory perception such as blindness

NUR601W1

DISCUSSION: J.R. is a nurse practitioner who serves an urban Chinese community. The challenges she faces daily include coordinating health care for the community members, fostering compliance with treatment regimens, and teaching the community about health prevention and early detection of diseases and conditions. J.R. has learned that one of

Module 1 Ethics

Discuss the interrelationship among theory, practice, and research.

CJP

 Fill out my clinical judgement plan Postpartum Spinal Headache Patient: Jane Doe Age: 27 years Gravida/Para: G1P1 PMH: None Allergies: NKDA Date of delivery: 06/15/2025 Delivery type: Vaginal / Anesthesia: Epidural Postpartum Day: 06/16/2025

Women’s Health Clinical Experience 1

Weekly Clinical Experience 1 Describe your clinical experience for this week with a patient with a yeast infection · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at