Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Response

See Attachment

Response 6ab

WHAT : REPLY to the TWO Discussion Posts

FORMAT : APA with In-text Citation and Reference List

REFERENCES : TWO Peer-Reviewed references minimum within last 5 years 

INCLUDE : Turnitin Report

* Please and THANK YOU *

_______________________

AbDj 

Discussion Post Reply #1 

Primary sources of research are immediately available observations regarding a topic
obtained from people with direct experience. This can include but not limited to a
textbook, an article, and journals. A primary source makes available firsthand evidence
with original data.

An overview or comprehensive analysis of previous research is referred to as a
literature review. A literature review has a purpose to get a better understanding of
specific research.

According to an article wrote by Maeda et al. (2021), “systematic review is a
‘methodology used systematically to search for and synthesize knowledge generated
through empirical studies to inform policy and decision-making and to uncover hidden
patterns or trends that exist among relevant studies’(Grant & Booth, 2009)”. This
approach is usually used to minimized bias in summarizing research and is a form of
secondary research.

A meta-analysis is a “statistical approach to synthesizing the results of a number of
studies that produce a larger sample size and thus greater power to determine the true
magnitude of an effect” (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019, p. 171). A systematic review
involves many studies to address a specific clinical question while avoiding bias, and
meta-analysis is used to analyze the studies into one result.

TaFri 

Discussion Post Reply #2 

Primary sources of research include the original data collected by the researcher or the
feelings and interpretation of the research by participants (Schuurman & Eijkman,
2013). However secondary sources include interpretations of research by other authors
(Schuurman & Eijkman, 2013). Sources of primary studies include CINAHL, Embase,
ERIC, and Medline (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). These sources are usually
accessible through institutions or personal subscriptions.

Literature reviews include a defined topic and research question, they provide a
summary of the literature emphasizing what is known in the literature and then provides
an overview summary of the research questions (Dodgeson, 2023). The researcher
should identify literature that can help them to answer the research question (Mathew,
2022). They should then summarize the knowledge found in the literature and can
further apply the review to their research (Dodgeson, 2023).

Systematic reviews are studies that use systematic search of literature and further
summarize primary research in away that is nonbiased (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt,
202). Systematic reviews are seen as superior to primary sources due to the limited
bias in systematic reviews (Mathew, 2022). The key aspects of systematic reviews
include: ask (PICOT or research question), access (obtaining literature to answer
research question), assimilate (find strategies that were used to synthesize primary
research studies), appraise (includes a critical appraisal of literature studies), analyze
(analyze descriptive and quantitative data), and apply (explain how findings can be
applied to patients) (Mathew, 2022).

Meta-analysis is pulling data from different individual studies (Mathew, 2022). The data
may be presented via graphs or plots to allow the reader to easily understand the data.
The meta-analysis includes six questions to help the reader further understand the
data. These include: what is the comparison, what outcome is being compared, how is
the data presented, what statistical model is used, what is the pooled effect, and what
is the heterogeneity (Mathew, 2022).

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Week 4 discussion

Advanced practice nurses apply continuous quality improvement (CQI) processes to improve client-centered outcomes. Select one of the following client-centered care initiatives that you would like to improve in your practice area: client clinical outcomes, client satisfaction, care coordination during care transitions, or specialty consultations for clients.    Include the following

EBP

Module 2:  Overview of EBP Process and Translation Instructions: As a DNP scholar, you are expected to perform an academic search of scholarly peer-review journal articles on a given topic. For this assignment, you will choose an article from a peer-review journal database, including but not limited to CINAHL, MEDLINE,

Nursing homework

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

Rwh soap

Rwh soap It  This file is too large to display.View in new window

Week 5_JOURNAL_DNP855

 There are many theories associated with organizational behaviors. Organizational behavior theories study how employees interact with each other and the healthcare  

Week 5_DNP855

 There are many theories associated with organizational behaviors. Organizational behavior theories study how employees interact with each other and the healthcare organization  

Nursing homework

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

MM week 4

INSERT YOUR NAME HERE In-text citation for the resource – in the References list below this table include a full citation. You are required to upload the full-text file for each article represented in the matrix table into the assignment drop box. What is the purpose of the resource to

MR soap week 4

MR soap week 4 years Biological Sex: Male Race: White, Non Hispanic Clinical Information Time with Patient: 30 minutes Consult with Preceptor: 15 minutes Type of Decision-Making: Moderate complexity Student Participation: Shared (50-50) Reason for Visit: Follow-up (Routine) Chief Complaint: major depressive disorder Social Problems Addressed: Safety Role Change Procedures/Skills

powerpoint for topic

the topic is: Mother’s with infants who have hyperbilirubinemia instruction attached  Teaching Experience-316L 1. Purpose: To provide teaching to an individual client with a demonstrated need. With the completion of this assignment the student will be able to achieve the following objectives. a. Demonstrate ability to thoroughly assess the learning

Nursing

To prepare: Read and view the Learning Resources. By Day 3 of Week 10 Post a response to the following prompts: Evaluate a DNP QI project that used a mixed methods approach (choose from the list).  What was the relationship to the practice-focused question to the use of the quantitative

Nursing

To prepare: Read and view the Learning Resources. By Day 3 of Week 10 Post a response to the following prompts: Evaluate a DNP QI project that used a mixed methods approach (choose from the list).  What was the relationship to the practice-focused question to the use of the quantitative

Nursing

To Prepare Review the resources provided in the Nursing Informatics Competencies.  By Day 3 of Week 10 Post a cohesive response to the following: Consider all that you already knew and what you have learned in this class. What are the key informatics competencies that you feel every nurse should

home work

Competency Integrate social determinants, ethical concerns, and human rights for high-risk and vulnerable global populations. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “Grading rubric” in the right menu.  Scenario As a nurse on the ethics committee of a free clinic, you are educating staff

Data analysis and visualization activity

Table 1 Patient ID Age Gender Falls (Yes/No) CAUTIs (Yes/No) Medication Errors (Yes/No) MRSA (Yes/No) Age Falls CAUTIs Medication Errors MRSA 1 65 Female Yes No Yes No 67.5 2 70 Male No Yes No Yes 3 55 Female Yes No No No Male Female 4 80 Male No Yes