Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

case study

Description

the title 68Ga-DOTA-TOC-injection (EP) in NETs arised from neuroendocrine cells

the reference more than4 Vancouver style follow the rubric in the file

Students Case Study Rubric
Course: RNM 417
Student: …………………………………………….
Case study title: ………………………………..……

Criteria

Needs

Unsatisfactory
(1)

Satisfactory
(3)

Improvement

Excellent
(4)

(2)
1. Patient’s

Minimal

Basic

Adequate

Comprehensive

History

demographic

demographics

demographic and

patient history with

information

provided; lacks

clinical

relevant details.

provided.

detail.

information.

2. Previous

No previous

Limited previous

Some relevant

Thorough discussion

Investigations

investigations

investigations;

previous

of all relevant

mentioned.

unclear results.

investigations

previous

included.

investigations.

3. Dose and the
way of
administration

Does not

Only the dose

The dose is

The dos is explained

mentioned

written

mentiond and

and well identified

administration

and Well investigated

way

procedure of
administration

4. Imaging

Imagigng

Imaging technique

imaging

Comprehensive

procedures

technique and

and radioisotope

technique and

detail on imaging

settings not

mentioned but lacks

radioisotope

technique

specified.

detail on settings.

details, camera

radioisotope

setting, matrix

details,

camera

and

setting,

matrix

reconstruction

and

are specified

reconstruction

adequately.

method

and

images and

for

Score

specific settings used.

5. Findings

6. Discussion

Findings poorly

Some findings

Adequate

Thorough description

described; no

mentioned, but lack

findings

of findings with

images included.

detail; unclearimages.

described;

clear, well-labeled

images are clear.

images.

Little to no

Some analysis

Good analysis

In-depth analysis

analysis; unclear

present, but lacks

with reasonable

with insightful

conclusions.

depth.

conclusions.

interpretations and
clear diagnosis.

No conclusionor
summary
provided.

7. Conclusion

8.radiation protection
procedure for Patient

Minimal
conclusion;lacks
clarity.

Adequate summary
of the case study.

Clear, concise, and
insightful summary of
thecase.

No measures taken to protect patient.

Comprehensive anonymization; no identifiable
information is included.

(0)

(2)

Student achievement: …………./10…..
Evaluator: ……………………………..
Signature: ……………………………..

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

515 ct 2-2

Description Return and Risk (110 points) You are the patient safety director for a medium-sized hospital. Your radiology manager identified that the current image viewing software has a technical problem that may skip important images when the radiologists are interpreting CT exams. The skipping of images could lead to misinterpretations.

515 ct 2-3

Description Return and Risk (110 points) You are the patient safety director for a medium-sized hospital. Your radiology manager identified that the current image viewing software has a technical problem that may skip important images when the radiologists are interpreting CT exams. The skipping of images could lead to misinterpretations.

515 ct 2-4

Description Return and Risk (110 points) You are the patient safety director for a medium-sized hospital. Your radiology manager identified that the current image viewing software has a technical problem that may skip important images when the radiologists are interpreting CT exams. The skipping of images could lead to misinterpretations.

515 ct 2-5

Description Return and Risk (110 points) You are the patient safety director for a medium-sized hospital. Your radiology manager identified that the current image viewing software has a technical problem that may skip important images when the radiologists are interpreting CT exams. The skipping of images could lead to misinterpretations.

515 ct 2-6

Description Return and Risk (110 points) You are the patient safety director for a medium-sized hospital. Your radiology manager identified that the current image viewing software has a technical problem that may skip important images when the radiologists are interpreting CT exams. The skipping of images could lead to misinterpretations.

515 ct 2-7

Description Return and Risk (110 points) You are the patient safety director for a medium-sized hospital. Your radiology manager identified that the current image viewing software has a technical problem that may skip important images when the radiologists are interpreting CT exams. The skipping of images could lead to misinterpretations.