Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Asssigment

My community Miami Florida choose the topic is open

The purpose of this assignment is to identify a problem or concern in your organization, local community, or state in which change can occur through advocacy and legislation.

Nurses often become motivated to change aspects within the larger health care system based on their real-world experience. As such, many nurses take on an advocacy role to influence a change in regulations, policies, and laws that govern the larger health care system.

Identify a problem or concern in your organization, local community, or state. Examples of problems relevant to nursing include, but are not limited to, title “nurse” protection, sharps injury prevention, nursing shortage, nurse well-being, valuation of nursing services, etc. Research the issue you selected and use the attached “Creating Change Through Advocacy” template to complete this assignment.

You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Rubric Criteria

Criteria Description

Describe a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues.

5. Target

18 points

A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is thorough and includes relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable

15.3 points

A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is detailed.

3. Approaching

13.5 points

A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

11.7 points

A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is not present.

Criteria Description

Explain an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy. (C9.4) (C9.4)

5. Target

18 points

An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is thorough and provides detailed support from research.

4. Acceptable

15.3 points

An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is detailed and provides support from research.

3. Approaching

13.5 points

An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is present but lacks support from research.

2. Insufficient

11.7 points

An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is not present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for advocacy is not present.

Criteria Description

Identify a minimum of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years.

5. Target

18 points

Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present and provides substantive evidence of the identified issue.

4. Acceptable

15.3 points

Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present and provides evidence of the identified issue.

3. Approaching

13.5 points

Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present but lacks evidence of the identified issue or falls outside of the five-year limit.

2. Insufficient

11.7 points

Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is not present.

Criteria Description

Discuss the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why.

5. Target

7.5 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is thorough.

4. Acceptable

6.38 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is detailed.

3. Approaching

5.63 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is present.

2. Insufficient

4.88 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is not present.

Criteria Description

Discuss the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why.

5. Target

7.5 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is thorough and includes relevant detail on how to debate these considerations.

4. Acceptable

6.38 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is detailed and includes some detail on how to debate these considerations.

3. Approaching

5.63 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is present but lacks detail on how to debate these considerations.

2. Insufficient

4.88 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is not present.

Criteria Description

Explain the financial impact of the issue and the solution.

5. Target

12 points

An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is thorough and includes relevant supporting detail from research.

4. Acceptable

10.2 points

An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is detailed and includes some supporting detail from research.

3. Approaching

9 points

An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is present but lacks detail from research.

2. Insufficient

7.8 points

An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is incomplete.

Criteria Description

Discuss how to advocate for the proposal using legislation.

5. Target

15 points

A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is thorough and includes substantial detail from research.

4. Acceptable

12.75 points

A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is detailed and includes some detail from research.

3. Approaching

11.25 points

A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is present but lacks substantial detail from research.

2. Insufficient

9.75 points

A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is not present.

Criteria Description

Discuss the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation.

5. Target

12 points

A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is thorough and includes substantial detail.

4. Acceptable

10.2 points

A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is detailed and includes some detail.

3. Approaching

9 points

A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is present but lacks substantial detail.

2. Insufficient

7.8 points

A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of the role interprofessional collaboration plays in advocacy through legislation is not present.

Criteria Description

Description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership

5. Target

15 points

A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is thorough and includes substantial.

4. Acceptable

12.75 points

A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is detailed and includes some detail.

3. Approaching

11.25 points

A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is present but lacks substantial detail.

2. Insufficient

9.75 points

A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of two leadership competencies identified by the AONE that would be necessary for a nurse to advocate for the legislative solution proposed, including a discussion of how the theory of servant leadership supports these competencies, is not present.

Criteria Description

Discuss how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias.

5. Target

15 points

A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is thorough and includes substantial detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.

4. Acceptable

12.75 points

A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is detailed and includes some detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.

3. Approaching

11.25 points

A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is present but lacks detail regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.

2. Insufficient

9.75 points

A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in health care without bias is not present.

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

7.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

6.38 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

5.63 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient

4.88 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target

4.5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable

3.82 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching

3.38 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient

2.93 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total150 points

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

308Risk Management Program Analysis – Part One

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze a health care risk management program. The concepts in this assignment will be expanded on in the Topic 2 assignment and the Topic 3 benchmark assignment.

307Interprofessional Collaboration

The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate how interprofessional education has evolved within the health care environment to support a more team-based approach to patient-centered health care.

307Topic 1 DQ 1

Read the “Patient-Centered Care” case study at the end of Chapter 3 in the textbook and respond to the following questions: How could the team have better included Mr. Ramos’s wife and family in his rehabilitation? How might the involvement of Mr. Ramos’s family have changed the outcome of his

Clinical Experience 2

Describe your clinical experience for this week with a patient with high cholesterol · Did you face any challenges, any successes? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnoses

The House Painter Patient Evaluation and Management Plan

A 52-year-old male patient who is a house painter presents to the office reporting chronic fatigue and “mild” chest pain. When he is painting, chest pain is relieved after taking a break. He reports that the pain usually lasts 5 minutes or less and occasionally spreads to his left arm

Informatics Education Plan

Use attachments Role of the Chief Informatics Officer The Chief Informatics Officer (CHIO) is a senior-level executive responsible for the strategic and operational use of information technology (IT) in a health care organization. The CHIO’s role is to ensure that IT is used to improve patient care, operational efficiency, and

WGU D219 Scholarship in Nursing Practice

  B.  Discuss the impact of a clinical practice problem on the patient or patients and the organization it affects. 1.  Identify each of the following PICO components of the clinical practice problem: •   P: patient, population, or problem •   I: intervention •   C: comparison •   O:

Reprolife

Explain the following concepts: Asexual – sexual reproduction. Mitosis – Meiosis Diploid – Haploid Gametes Fertilization Zygote Syngamy Blastocyst Implantation Gastrulation Embryo – Fetus Explain fertilization process from cellular level to fetus (as per video time 1:08:00) After learning about fertilization process, and according to nature and objectively, and scientifically

Week 3 DP response 2

see attachment  Case Scenario 1 Table 1: Standard levels of HCG during pregnancy (Alexander et al., 2024) Table 2: Scenarios GA weeks HCG level 3 weeks LMP 5-50 mIU/mL 4 weeks LMP 5-426 mIU/mL 5 weeks LMP 18-7,340 mIU/mL 6 weeks LMP 1,080-56,500 mIU/mL 7-8 weeks LMP 7,650-229,000 mIU/mL 9-12

SOC151

Write a sociological autobiography of your life, with special emphasis on your socialization process. Use C. Wright Mills sociological imagination to view yourself as an outsider might. According to sociologist C. Wright Mills, people usually see the world through the limited experience of family, relatives, friends, and fellow workers. This

Week 3 DP Response

see attachment  Table 1: Standard Levels of hCG During Pregnancy Table 2: hCG Trends in Various Pregnancy Scenarios Table 3: Common Complaints During Pregnancy GA Weeks (LMP) hCG Level (mIU/mL) 3 weeks LMP 5 – 50 4 weeks LMP 5 – 426 5 weeks LMP 18 – 7,340 6 weeks

Nursing assignment

Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment CliniClinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Procedures Self-Assessment Before embarking on any professional or academic activity, it is important to understand the background, knowledge, and experience you bring to it. You might ask yourself “What do I  already know? What do I  need to know? And what do

HCP Week 3 Reply to Peer 2

One of the main differences between the healthcare systems of the United Kingdom and the United States lies in their financing structure. The United Kingdom operates under a public healthcare system known as the National Health Service (NHS), funded by the government through taxes (Childers, 2016). In contrast, the US

Role Trans Week 2

Compare the primary care NP role with other APN roles. What are the similarities among the roles, what are the differences, and how would you communicate the role to a healthcare provider and a consumer?

Patho Week 2 Case Study

Pulmonary Function: D.R. is a 27-year-old man, who presents to the nurse practitioner at the Family Care Clinic complaining of increasing SOB, wheezing, fatigue, cough, stuffy nose, watery eyes, and postnasal drainage—all of which began four days ago. Three days ago, he began monitoring his peak flow rates several times

Nursing homework

SMART Goals Assignment For this assignment, you will work on setting goals for yourself using the SMART method. You will find an explanation of this method in the module that will guide you in your goal-setting process. You will list a minimum of five professional goals that you would like

Nursing Homework

SMART Goals Assignment For this assignment, you will work on setting goals for yourself using the SMART method. You will find an explanation of this method in the module that will guide you in your goal-setting process. You will list a minimum of five professional goals that you would like

cardiovascular system

POWERPOINT Cardiovascular System: · Explain various congenital heart defects, their impact on heart function, and innovations in surgical or medical treatments Your presentation must: · Explain the processes or concepts in your own words using references to support your explanations.  · Include all necessary physiology and pathophysiology in your explanation.