Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

assessment

Literature Review Revision – Rubric

Summary of existing literature 72 points

Criteria Description

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study. Minimum

of 1250 words. Peer-reviewed sources were cited.

5. Target 72 points

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

thoughtful and makes relevant connections to current research in the field. 10-15

peer-reviewed sources were cited.

4. Acceptable 61.2 points

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

concise and makes some connections to current research in the field. 10-15 peer-

reviewed sources were cited.

3. Approaching 54 points

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is clear.

10 peer-reviewed sources were cited.

2. Insufficient 46.8 points

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

vague or inadequate. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet

the minimum word count.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

missing. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet the minimum

word count.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Proposed research 24 points

Criteria Description

Explanation how proposed research will add to existing literature.

5. Target 24 points

Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

research is insightful and makes relevant connections to current research.

4. Acceptable 20.4 points

Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

research is thoughtful and makes some connections to current research.

3. Approaching 18 points

Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

research is clear.

2. Insufficient 15.6 points

Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

research is vague or inadequate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

research is missing.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 12 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 12 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 10.2 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Approaching 9 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Insufficient 7.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

audience is evident.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 6 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.1 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.5 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 3.9 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 6 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 5.1 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 4.5 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 3.9 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 120 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Psychology Week 6 Assignment

Select a critical incident (Palisades Fire) that has occurred within the last year that you can use to respond to the questions.  Review crisis intervention theories and the categories of crisis. Consider why some individuals may be more resilient when experiencing a crisis than others. Answer the following questions: “Can

home work

please no Ai. follow the instructions Due Jul 9 75 points View Split Screen All Search entries or author… Newest First Back to Week at a Glance ( For this Discussion, you examine why some individuals are aggressive toward others and how social psychologists might explain various types of aggressive

7.5

Part 1: In your view can coercive treatment be effective? Why or why not? Discuss its pros and cons. Post your answers and respond to 2 other classmates’ postings. Student 1 response: Yes, I think coercive treatment can work in some situations, especially when someone is a danger to themselves

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need assistance with a reflection · Weekly “Reflection” Papers – The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the material in the readings by sharing your interpretation of a primary topic. You may relate it to a case that you have either worked with or a family experience

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need assistance with a discussion question In today’s society, there is an incredibly complex combination of cultural/ethnic influences for our families. Traditionally, we used to think about multiculturalism as it affects a blended family unit from different cultural or ethnic backgrounds. While this is still an important part of

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need assistance with some research · Final Research Paper- This assignment should be 8-10 double spaced pages, APA style. You will need to utilize 3 scholarly sources. You may select the MFT theory of your choice to expand on. Discussion will need to include theoretical core ideas, assessment tools,

Week 7

Week 7. Discussion. Systems Theory In 1968, biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy developed General Systems Theory (GST). Simply put, GST suggests that complex issues are best understood by examining how interdependences and interrelationships among their component parts account for the whole. Prior to the development of systems theory, professionals from many

Discussion Response

I need a response to two discussion questions.  Discussion Post Guidelines: · Acknowledge your classmates’ posts. · Build upon these posts by providing additional details, statistics, ideas, perspectives, or links to interesting, relevant articles. · Conclude with a question or new idea to further stimulate the discussion. 1. Do we

Psychology Homework help

Conflict Theory and the Social Worker-Client Relationship ● ● ○ ● ○ ● ● ● ● To prepare: Review the following article listed in the Learning Resources:”Engaging Families in Child Welfare Services: Worker Versus Client Perspectives” by Altman. Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that succinctly addresses the following: Summarize

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need help with a reflection assignment · Weekly “Reflection” Papers – The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the material in the readings by sharing your interpretation of a primary topic. You may relate it to a case that you have either worked with or a family

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need assistance with a discussion This week we are focusing on the family as a Psychosocial unit. The family is a viable psychosocial system. It is comprised of members who interact and are connected. Families have rules, boundaries, hierarchies, as well as an established equilibrium. If there is one

Interp (reflection)

Assignment Instructions Choose one of the films below as your subject for a reflection paper addressing cultural representation as presented in a movie and discussing communication barriers that arise due to cultural differences between key characters. Alien Gran Torino           Remember the Titans A Silent Voice  Hidden Figures           Slumdog Millionaire Avatar

Week 6 Response

INSTRUCTIONS: Respond to the post below that discusses different theories than you did in one or more of the following ways: · Respectfully comment on whether you agree with your colleague about which concept, theory, or model would be better suited, and why or why not. Provide evidence from the literature

Psychologywk4

2 Please consider the following prompt and craft a response that sufficiently captures all aspects of it from your unique point of view and original research. Please cite and reference any source(s) you use to help write this response in APA format. Notice that in addition to your Main Entry

PSYCHOLOGY103WK8

2 Stereotypes have become a very taboo word in today’s culture.  The headlines freely use stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination interchangeably.  How have stereotypes impacted your life directly?  Indirectly?  Remember, stereotypes do not always have to have negative consequences.  Consider using a positive example, if you have one. Please provide at

Human Sexuality

See attached  Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Instructions 1. Review the module presentation and the recommended and additional resources. 2. This assignment focuses on sexually transmitted diseases or infections (STDs/STIs) that are little known or talked about. 3. You should look up information on STDs/STIs and select a specific infection that

Week 6

 Reflect on the following scenario. Consider how you might intervene with Paul. Scenario 1: Paul is a 65-year-old, Caucasian male who is a recent widow after his wife of 45 years passed away from cancer. Paul admits that he has been struggling to manage his grief and admits that he

Dis

Part 1: The DSM-5 system for diagnosis is based on pathology and the medical model of mental illness, whereas counseling is grouded in the wellness model. Why must counselors learn to diagnose clinical disorders? Post and respond to at least two other classmates’ posts. Provide evidence of content knowledge and