Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Applied Sciences Assignment

Rules for Discussion – RTI and EBP 

Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts and 2 replies.  Canvas often groups posts and I will respond to posts of the same topic. So, I may not be able to respond to each and every post, but I will group my responses to make sure to address the topics presented. Discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another assignment. 

This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric displayed earlier. Your original posts and responses are to be reflective of the current literature, clearly state your position and be brief but thorough. Your responses should also be respectful of the person whose post you are responding to. In this discussion, you will present two effective RTI and/or EBP strategies. You can do 2 of EBP or RTI or 2 of either one of the topics.  Your discussion should reflect best practice as found in the literature and not just a personal preference. Your posts do not have to be long but complete enough that others can understand the intervention or strategy and how it is used. Do not hesitate to reach out to me for assistance. 

RTI and EBP cover a lot of territory. Obviously, you could not cover the entire area of responses in these topics so focus your posts on a specific element(s) of RTI or EBP such as the state of the literature in these topics, issues and problems with some element of RTI or EBP or issues with implementation of RTI or EBP. Please free to focus on any elements of EBP or RtI that you find interesting.

General Rubric For All Assignments

This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course, we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

 

    Criteria                                                                     Ratings

 

 

 

 

 

Grasp of readings

 

Excellent

Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments.

Good

Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail.

Developing

Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Critical analysis

Excellent

Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue.

Good

Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining.

Developing

Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Evidence

Excellent

Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated.

Good

Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated.

Developing

Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.

Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Organization & Clarity

Excellent

Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research.

Good

Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly.

Developing

Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections.

 

Needs Improvement

Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Mechanics

Excellent

When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues.

Good

Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues.

Developing

There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues.

Needs Improvement

Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

QUZ and QDD

Using ChatGPT (Artificial Intelligence AI) respond to the following questions: 1. What is organizational change according to AI? How does the definition compare to the textbook’s definition? 2. What are the organizational change models listed by ChatGPT? Describe each of them. TEXTBOOK(S) AND REQUIRED MATERIALS: Title: Organization Change: Theory and

8

The purpose of this discussion is to reflect on your own readiness to practice as a DNP- prepared nurse, to consider what you learned in this course and how this knowledge will impact your practice. Reflective inquiry allows for the expansion of self-awareness, identification of knowledge gaps, and assessment of

2 discussions adv

2 separate discussions It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum requirement, but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the

GrowthCase

The purpose of the Case Assignment is to create a “Live Case” by experiencing the process of coaching. Because this case is designed around  experiential learning , we can go beyond the conceptual knowledge covered in the reading materials to actual skills building. This requires putting what you are learning

GrowthSlp

Developing a vision statement In Module 1, you began the process of the Leadership Growth Plan with a thorough self-assessment. Then you identified and prioritized your most important values and motivators and explored your basic leadership style. In this module, you will establish your vision and determine what you need

77

The purpose of this discussion is for the DNP student to demonstrate an understanding of how stakeholders influence practice change. You will continually gain experience considering the organization, community, and national stakeholders and how they influence sustained practice change. 1. Identify and examine organization and/or community stakeholders you anticipate will

COM Week 3

  View the TED Talk “Weird, or just different?”Links to an external site. by Derek Sivers (TEDIndia, 2009). Respond to the following questions: What are your impressions of his talk? Did his talk give you any new perspective on the process or skill of communication, especially with regard to intercultural

98

  Specific Instructions: Team Structure: As part of the course, starting Week 2, you will all be automatically placed into groups, and all your Discussions until the end of the class will be carried out in groups. So, in each week’s discussion, you will only see your teammates.  Please respond

Applied Sciences WK3 ASSIGNMENT2

Week Three: Module 3 Session 6 Assignment Paper Assignment: Please refer to your org. structure that you were guided to retrieve in Module Two. Next, see pg. 226: Given the current structure of your chosen org., decide whether a redesign would help your organization compete more effectively, or reach its

wk8

LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES RELATED TO PSYCHIATRIC EMERGENCIES The diagnosis of psychiatric emergencies can include a wide range of problems—from serious drug reactions to abuse and suicidal ideation/behaviors. Regardless of care setting, the PMHNP must know how to address emergencies, coordinate care with other members of the health care team

DQQ33

There are three questions, Q1 discissions, and the other 2  Q are replies for friends Q.2 and Q.3  Q.1 THINKING PASSAGES: GLOBAL WARMING (350 or More) The three passages on global warming offer very different views on the validity of the concept. You should answer the questions at the end

Gospel Message Friendships and Barriers

What practical steps would you take to build a friendship with a follower of this worldview who might be a co-worker, neighbor, etc.? What do’s and don’ts would you apply when preparing to share the gospel with them? What are some beliefs/reasons a person from this worldview might have that

SE

READ- Problem There are knowledge gaps between heart disease and depression risk factors. Cardiovascular patients may have depressive symptoms that develop, due to chronicity of their illness, lack of physical activity, increased stress levels, or pre-existing mental health conditions. Cardiovascular individuals are screened for depressive symptoms utilizing validated screeners: and

pi

2 Discussion: Biomedical Issues and Donations Name Institution Course Professor Date Your major paper is focused on persuasion theories and is due Oct. 17 Read Chapters Five and six and select only three theories.  Only choose three from the following theories: 1.      Authoritarianism and acquiescence (these are concepts and not a

Discussion response unit 6 adv health

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts.  To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts: · Do you agree with your peers’ assessment? · Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion. ·

Unit 6 response adv psych

Instructions: Please read and respond to at least two of your peers’ initial postings. You may want to consider the following questions in your responses to your peers: · Compare and contrast your initial posting with those of your peers.   · How are they similar or how are they