Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Assessment

Follow rubric and all instructions carefully.

Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

Rubric

Introduction Paragraph 10 points

Criteria Description

Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

5. Target 10 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

clear, appropriate and has strong details.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

missing.

Collapse All

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 1 of 11

Participants Section 15 points

Criteria Description

Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

of participants needed to conduct the study.

5. Target 15 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

details.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 2 of 11

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 3 of 11

Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

Criteria Description

List what is needed to conduct the study.

5. Target 10 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

insightful with exceptional details.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

details.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

many important details.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 4 of 11

Procedures Section 15 points

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 5 of 11

Criteria Description

Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

researcher could replicate your study.

5. Target 15 points

Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

directions.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

replicate the study from these directions.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

fully replicate the study from these directions.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 6 of 11

Design Section 15 points

Criteria Description

Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

groups.

5. Target 15 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

is strong with sound details.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 7 of 11

Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

Criteria Description

Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

5. Target 15 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

important details.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 8 of 11

Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

Criteria Description

Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

5. Target 10 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

clear, appropriate and has strong details.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 9 of 11

Mechanics of Writing 6 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

sentence structure, etc.

5. Target 6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.1 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.5 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 3.9 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

throughout.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 10 of 11

Format/Documentation 4 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

errors.

3. Approaching 3 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

provided.

Total 100 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 11 of 11

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Topic 1 DQ 2 Response

Topic 1 DQ 2 Response to Josiah Mastriano Humanity has a diverse set of worldviews: from atheistic, to polytheistic, to monotheistic. These differences in perspectives narrow even further into cultural diversity, which is something that should be celebrated as a clinical mental health counselor (GCU, 2025a). However, a student needs

DQ1 Response

DQ1 Response to peer Katie Mayorga  My selected video was over navigating. I found this video provided a decent amount of overview into properly navigating the LMS, including class calendar, discussion boards, the syllabus, just to name a few. I found it particularly useful to learn that I can view

Topic 1 DQ 3

Assessment Description Throughout the counseling program, you will be using Zoom to demonstrate counseling skills and attend synchronous components. Please review the two Class Resources “GCU Zoom Resources: Counseling and Social Work” and “Zoom Access” to answer this discussion question. What concerns do you have using Zoom in your counseling

DE Week 4 Discussion

As our homes, cities, and vehicles become more digitally connected, they generate vast amounts of data that can serve as digital evidence. The evolution of smart technology impacts digital forensics and investigations. For this discussion consider how automated systems in our living spaces, urban environments, and transportation networks create digital

Psychology Homework

Week 7 Assignment: Decision Making Analysis Paper 1. Create a one-paragraph hypothetical scenario that illustrates one of the following types of dilemmas or challenges. ● A moral dilemma (e.g., deciding whether to report a coworker for unethical behavior) ● A practical problem (e.g., choosing between job offers with different benefits)

Psychology

Write as a freshman in college Week 7 Assignment: Decision-Making Analysis Paper Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Available 1. Create a one-paragraph hypothetical scenario that illustrates one of the following types of dilemmas or challenges. ● A moral dilemma (e.g., deciding whether to report

Psychology Research

Need help on understanding research methods  Your Name Here Capella University PSYC4600: Research Methods in Psychology Research Project Part 3: Final Research Report Instructor Month, Year Literature Review [Enter your revised literature review here. Incorporate feedback given from previous assignments.]  Method  [Enter your revised method section here. Incorporate feedback given

Psychology

Write as a freshman in college Week 6 Assignment: Mental Health Disorder Paper Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Available Dec 1 at 12am – Dec 10 at 11:59pm Compose a 2- to 3-page paper that reviews a mental health disorder

APPLIED PROJECT

1 Applied Project General Project Guidelines: 1. Papers must be written using the current APA Publication Manual. Papers must be five to seven typed double-spaced pages. 2. Papers must include a minimum of five relevant resources, appropriately cited. Project: Stress Management for Salespeople Frank Taylor’s automobile dealership has a number

Drug Addiction

Adr Assignment description:  (Total 36 points) Please select one chapter (e.g., psychological health, drug abuse, nutrition, etc.) covered during this course to create a PSA video using Adobe Creative Rush. Your presentation must be between 60-90 seconds in length and include both audio and video. It should cover important facts and

assig 2

attached Assignment #2 (See due date in the schedule file in Modules or Course Calendar)  In this assignment you will identify 3 effective practices or  interventions that have been proven in the professional literature to be effective with children with special needs and 3 ineffective practices used with this population.

Psychology Week 1 home assignment

Help with homework Assignment see instructions attached  Week 1 This module’s Doctoral Degree Coach™ tasks and the Learning Resources introduced important skills, such as evaluating resources you find online, using database search skills to find the resources you need in the library, evaluating the reliability and credibility of authors and

psych L. Blue

This assignment three parts, answer each question in full or you will not get full credit. Part A 600 words (country: United States) Refer to the conformity and social norms section starting on p. 533 in your textbook. Then review the following two articles in Psychology Today: How Cultures Make

Mod 8 Self-Reflection

see attached Assignment Overview: This self-assessment paper invites you to reflect deeply on how your personal ethics, background, and values intersect with the ethical standards of the social work or human services profession. Ethical dilemmas are a natural part of the field, and understanding how your own identity and experiences

Report and powerpoint

ECED 6270-HYB- Counseling Diverse Populations Cultural Learning Experience- Powerpoint Presentation Student: Class Presentation-PowerPoint- (40 Points) Date of Presentation: Submitted on time: (10 pts) Powerpoint organized and free from errors: (10 pts) Presentation Delivery: (10 pts.) Provides thoughtful reflection and demonstrates learning of the target person/culture: (10 pts.) Total (40 pts):

College Algebra I-DBX-DL05

  Objective: To recognize search tools appropriate for specific purposes.                    To perform a search given an author, a journal, and a topic.