Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

case study wk3

Gynecologic Health

Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems or symptoms. Such case studies enable nurse learners to apply concepts, lessons, and critical thinking to interviewing, screening, diagnostic approaches, as well as the development of treatment plans.

For this Case Study Assignment, you will analyze a case study scenario to obtain information related to a comprehensive well-woman exam and determine differential diagnoses, diagnostics, and develop treatment and management plans.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

· Review the 4 case studies in this week’s Learning Resources. Select one of the cases to prepare your written assignment.

· Review the Learning Resources for this week and pay close attention to the media program related to the basic microscope skills. Also, consider re-reviewing the media programs found in Week 1 Learning Resources.

· Carefully review the clinical guideline resources.

Assignment Instructions:

· Use the Case Study Template from the Learning Resources to complete the assignment. Your submission must include a brief case write-up, followed by the fully completed template, which must be integrated into the document rather than submitted separately.

· Include a title page, a case summary in your own words, the completed template, and a reference page formatted in APA style.

· Ensure your submission meets all criteria outlined in the template and rubric for completeness and accuracy.

By Day 7 of Week 3

Submit your case study assignment by 
Day 7 of Week 3.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
Wk3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week3_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week3_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyzes subjective and objective data and outlines applicable diagnostic tests related to case studies.

30 to >26.7 ptsExcellentThe response provides clear, complete, and comprehensive descriptions of subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining all diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

26.7 to >23.7 ptsGoodThe response provides clear, complete partial descriptions of the components of the subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining most of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

23.7 to >20.7 ptsFairThe response provides some components of the subjective and objective case data, but they are incomplete, vague or inaccurate, outlining some of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

20.7 to >0 ptsPoorThe response provides unclear or incomplete components of subjective and objective case data. The diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions are missing, incorrect, or inappropriately applied.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies differential diagnoses related to case studies.

30 to >26.76 ptsExcellentThe response contains at least 3 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.

26.76 to >23.7 ptsGoodThe response contains at least 2 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.

23.7 to >20.7 ptsFairThe response contains at least 1 differential diagnosis relevant and applicable to the case.

20.7 to >0 ptsPoorThe response contains few or no differential diagnoses and/or diagnoses are not relevant and applicable to the case.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormulates a treatment plan related to case studies based on scientific rationale, evidence- based standards of care, and practice guidelines. Integrates ethical, psychological, physical, financial issues and Social Determinants of Health in plan.

30 to >26.76 ptsExcellentFormulates a thorough treatment plan including explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Fully incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources, with no less than 75% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

26.76 to >23.7 ptsGoodFormulates a partially complete treatment plan including partial explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Somewhat incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources with no less than 50% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

23.7 to >20.7 ptsFairFormulates a minimally complete treatment plan including incomplete or vague explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Lacking in synthesis of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least 2 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

20.7 to >0 ptsPoorFormulates a treatment plan that contains incomplete explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options and/ or explanations are missing. Lacks synthesis gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by 1 or no current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.45 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4.45 to >3.95 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.95 to >3.45 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.45 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.45 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.

4.45 to >3.95 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.95 to >3.45 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3.45 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Charlene Baja is the Case study. Information needed to complete the assignment was provided in week two announcements. You will analyze a case study scenario to obtain information related to a comprehensive well-woman exam and determine differential diagnoses, diagnostics, and develop a treatment and management plan. Please use the case study template.

To prepare:

· By Day 1 of this week, you will be choosing one of the two assigned case study scenarios provided.

· Review the Learning Resources for this week and pay close attention to the media program related to basic microscope skills. Also, consider re-reviewing the media programs found in Week 1 Learning Resources.

· Carefully review the clinical guideline resources.

· Use the Case Study Template found in the Learning Resources to support the development of your assignment.

Some questions to consider as you complete your SOAP NOTE for all Case Studies.  

·
Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding her personal and medical history? What additional information is needed?

·
Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment? What additional assessment/observations are needed?

·
Assessment: What are your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible differentials. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why?

·
Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and , labs and diagnostic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters, as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan.

·
Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation?

IMPORTANT: For the 
Assessment and 
Plan sections, please make sure you don’t just list the differential and final diagnoses.   I want to see your clinical reasoning/rationale based on the information you presented in subjective/objective information.  This clinical reasoning should be supported by scholarly evidence.  Scholarly evidence includes peer reviewed journal articles from the Walden library and/or current clinical guidelines from reputable sources within the last five years.  This will address the “why” as stated above in the requirement

Remember the difference between a primary diagnosis versus a differential:

A Primary diagnosis-is the one diagnosis established after proper assessment/examination and testing has been completed.

Differential diagnosis is the process of developing a 
list of the possible conditions that might produce a patient’s symptoms and signs this is an important part of clinical reasoning. It enables appropriate testing to rule out possibilities and confirm a final (
primary) diagnosis.Practice and preparation decrease the incidence for errors.

Case Study week3
Case Study: Scenario 1
Charlene Baja is a 22-year-old G0 P0 L0 presents to the clinic today for burning and
discharge for 1 week. She states her boyfriend recently found out he was positive for
chlamydia. She denies any other partners besides him. Her medical history
is remarkable for anxiety and depression. Her surgical history is unremarkable. Her
social history includes social alcohol, but she denies tobacco and any recreational
drugs. She has no known drug allergies and takes a multivitamin and Srintec daily for
oral contraception. Her health history reveals that her mother is alive with breast
cancer in remission and hypothyroidism. Her paternal grandfather is alive with
prostate cancer. Her sister has type 1 diabetes as well. Her father has HTN, diabetes
type 2, and hyperlipidemia. Charlene has one brother with no medical history.
· Height 5’ 5” Weight 148 (BMI 24.6), BP 132/68 P 62
· HEENT: WNL
· Neck: lymph nodes grossly normal
· Lungs/CV: Chest is clear to auscultation bilaterally, normal respiration, rhythm, and
depth upon exam
· Breast: normal breast exam
· Abd: WNL
· VVBSU: WNL
· Cervix: firm, smooth, yellow watery discharge in large amount present
· Uterus: RV, mobile, non-tender
· Adnexa: WNL

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

PPT

Assigment The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book,  The Landmarks of Tomorrow  (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar? Nurses are

Mental Health PTSD

Mental Illness Creative Paper Assignment “A Day Living With My Mental Illness” Each student will write a one-page paper in first person as if you are living with your assigned mental illness. Be creative but realistic. The goal is to demonstrate understanding of what daily life might feel like for

discussion question

discussion question  Topic: healthcare providers shortages 1. Access the Policy Map Blog and view the blog listings (There are many pages of entries). 2. Briefly summarize (2-3 sentences) policy map blog and address the socio-political, ethical, and or nursing workforce implications of the topic. 3. APA format for references

Peer response

  The development of advanced practice nursing roles globally shows how important quality and safety competencies are in guiding practice. When looking at the variability in education, regulation, and scope of practice across countries, it becomes clear that standardized competencies are essential to ensure safe and consistent care (Wheeler et

nursing

see file In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect the need for the new policy. Second, create a detailed, annotated training agenda for the pilot

nursing

see file Propose an organizational policy and practice guidelines that you believe will lead to an improvement in quality and performance associated with the benchmark underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1. Be precise, professional, and persuasive in demonstrating the merit of your proposed actions. The policy proposal requirements

case study

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

casestudy

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

PLEASE READ ALL ATTACHED Week 2 Case Study Prompt  A 28-year-old African American woman presents with 4 months of worsening fatigue, joint  pain, and intermittent low-grade fevers. She reports: • Symmetrical pain and stiffness in hands and wrists (morning stiffness ~1 hour) • Photosensitivity • Facial rash that worsens with

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF SECONDARY DATA SOURCES

find attached n use the rubrics In this information age, where data are readily accessible and there is both a great demand for accelerated research projects and strict limitations on research funding, using existing data makes sense. Data used in this way are called secondary data; they come in many

Evaluation and Management

Evaluation and Management (E/M) Insurance coding and billing is complex, but it boils down to how to accurately apply a code, or CPT (current procedural terminology), to the service that you provided. The payer then reimburses the service at a certain rate. As a provider, you will have to understand

EBP

Module 7:  Research Project As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients’ need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of

Home work

Determine the linear correlation and regression equation between two variables to make predictions for the dependent variable. Project Deliverable tie to Competency  In this assignment, you will demonstrate your understanding of how relationships between two variables can be analyzed and used to make informed predictions. By interpreting scatter plots, conducting

DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY: DATA SOURCES AND DATA COLLECTION

Diabetes is a significant public health challenge in the United States, with Table 3.2 identifying Hemoglobin A1C levels, incidence of skin infections, obesity, peripheral neuropathy, and renal insufficiency as key measurable outcomes (Curley, 2024). The population selected for this discussion is Hispanic/Latino adults in the United States, a group disproportionately

Community Health

Please see attached. Create a slide presentation of the health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1. Complete the following: · Prepare a 12–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with detailed speaker notes that reflects your presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker

Scholarship For Nursing practice

It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. . All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format.

Week 1 clinic skills

Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the procedures identified on the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form.   Based on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.    Based on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop three to four (3–4) measurable goals and objectives for this practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form.