In this project, you will complete a clinical case study analysis, research review, and oral presentation about the pathophysiology of your chosen topic. In this project, you will work in groups of two to four people. You will present as a group and receive a participation/collaboration grade. You will also be graded based on your individual contribution to the content.
Your presentations should follow a case study SBAR format (situation, background, assessment, and recommendations). Include four (4) different medical-based evidence and/or research recommendations. You must include at least five (5) scholarly sources in your overall presentation.
Your group presentation should include:
Introduction to the case or situation
Background detail
Clinical assessment
Recommendations
Application to future practice
At least five (5) scholarly references supporting your ideas
The use of audiovisual aids such as PowerPoint, DVD clips, sound effects, posters, radiology films, medical reports, etc.
Opportunities for engagement with the audience such as a question and answer session
Submit your PowerPoint and any handouts to the assignment dropbox before your presentation. You may submit just your portion of the overall presentation OR submit the entire presentation; be clear which section you are responsible for.
Review the rubric for grading criteria.
*HIPPA Compliance: If you are using an actual person for your case study, please see your instructor to obtain a HIPPA release form so that we are in compliance with the Health Information Patient Privacy Act.
**At some campuses, there will be an incorporation of the “Team Teach” collaboration model where nursing faculty are invited to come and observe the presentations and give feedback from a clinical perspective. Your instructor will inform you if this is a requirement.
RubricGeneral Education Standardized Rubric: Research Project and Presentation RubricGeneral Education Standardized Rubric: Research Project and Presentation RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGROUP Collaboration and Participation9 to >8.01 ptsExceeds ExpectationsEvident that all group members contributed equally to the presentation. Professional collaboration and participation is apparent and executed well.8.01 to >6.48 ptsMeets ExpectationsCollaboration and participation are unbalanced, with some people carrying the presentation more than others.6.48 to >5.31 ptsApproaches ExpectationsCollaboration and participation is significantly unbalanced, with clear evidence that not all group members participated in the project equally. Complaints or issues were apparent in the group.5.31 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsCollaboration and participation were not evident in the presentation or negatively affected the presentation so that the overall content and meaning was impeded.9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGROUP Presentation and Organization9 to >8.01 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe presentation was well organized, structured and logically sequenced with valuable information. The group presented within time and engaged the audience. The presentation followed SBAR format with a/v aides that enhanced the presentation.At least 5 scholarly sources are included.8.01 to >6.48 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe presentation was structured and sequenced but may have been a bit disorganized in format and presentation of ideas. The group presented somewhat within time but may have gone severely under or over time or lacked engagement. The presentation followed SBAR format with a/v aides that somewhat enhanced the presentation and contained valuable information. 3-4 scholarly sources are included.6.48 to >5.31 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe presentation was disorganized in format and presentation of ideas so much that the content was affected. The presentation did not follow SBAR format with a/v aides and lacked engagement. Materials presented were somewhat valuable. 2 or less scholarly sources are included.5.31 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe presentation was disorganized in format and presentation of ideas so much that the content was affected and a lack of effort was apparent. There were no visual aides or they were not correlated to the content. There was little to no valuable information and no scholarly support.9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeINDIVIDUAL Presentation and Communication9 to >8.01 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe student presented his/her individual content expertly. Communication was precise, engaging and relayed the information concisely and with enthusiasm. Student presents content without reading from slides or notes, or uses them to a minimum.8.01 to >6.48 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe student presented his/her individual content. Communication was somewhat precise and he/she relayed the information concisely. There is a lack of enthusiasm or connection with the material. Student shows some synthesis of the information but has to frequently reference notes or papers.6.48 to >5.31 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe student presented his/her individual content with limited communication skill. There is a severe lack of enthusiasm or connection with the material. Student shows minimal synthesis of the information and has to frequently reference notes or papers in a manner that disrupts the presentation.5.31 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe student’s presentation is unclear and confusing. Content is unclear and there is no observed synthesis of information.9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeINDIVIDUAL Topic Knowledge9 to >8.01 ptsExceeds ExpectationsShows a full understanding of the topic. Able to accurately answer almost all questions asked.It is clear the student knows, understands and is able to communicate the information accurately in relation to the required content.8.01 to >6.48 ptsMeets ExpectationsShows a basic understanding of the topic. Able to accurately answer almost all questions asked.It is clear the student , understands and is able to mostly communicate the information in relation to the required content.6.48 to >5.31 ptsApproaches ExpectationsShows a minimal understanding of the topic. Not able to accurately answer almost all questions asked.It is clear the student may not understand all content and the required project information.5.31 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not seem to understand the topic very well. Unable to accurately answer questions asked. A severe lack of topic knowledge is apparent.9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeINDIVIDUAL Presentation Integrity and Support9 to >8.01 ptsExceeds ExpectationsResearch by the student meets or exceeds project requirements. Research and support is scholarly, relevant, and current.8.01 to >6.48 ptsMeets ExpectationsResearch by the student is slightly below project requirements. Research and support is relevant, and current but may not be scholarly. There may be some credibility issues in the support.6.48 to >5.31 ptsApproaches ExpectationsResearch by the student is far below project requirements. Research and support is not relevant, current or scholarly. There are some credibility issues in the support.5.31 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsAn apparent lack of research is evident. The student does not provide relevant support for their analysis.9 pts
