Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Case Study Assignment: William Dillon The William Dillon case (1981–2008) highlights multiple failure points we’ve studied—especially misapplied forensics (dog scent “science”), eyewitness error, inf

Case Study Assignment: William Dillon

The William Dillon case (1981–2008) highlights multiple failure points we’ve studied—especially misapplied forensics (dog scent “science”), eyewitness error, informant incentives, and official misconduct. Do an AI deep dive or thorough Google search to learn more, then answer the questions below. 

AI Use:  Sanctioned – Use AI or search tools to find sources and learn about the case. Unsanctioned – Using AI to draft your answers.Write in your own words and cite sources.

Case Study Questions:

1) Definitions

  • Was William Dillon factually innocent?
  • Does this case illustrate a wrong-person conviction, a no-crime case, or something in between?

2) History

  • Where does Dillon’s case sit within the broader timeline of wrongful convictions we studied (e.g., Borchard’s catalog, pre-DNA practices, rise of the Innocence Movement)?
  • How did post-conviction DNA testing change the landscape compared with earlier eras?

3) Prevalence

  • Considering estimates that 0.5–5% of felony convictions may be wrongful, what does Dillon’s case suggest about the risk from small-sample forensic methods (e.g., dog scent, bite marks)?
  • How might official secrecy or lost evidence contribute to undercounting wrongful convictions?

4) Process and Production

  • Identify failure points at each stage: investigation (focus on Preston’s testing), charging, trial (eyewitness + informant + dog scent), appeals, post-conviction.
  • What gatekeeping should have been applied to Preston’s methods (Daubert/Frye factors such as validation, error rates, peer review, standards)?

5) Causes and Correlates

  • Which causes from our reader are most evident (misapplied forensics, mistaken ID, informants, official misconduct, inadequate defense resources)?
  • Explain precisely how each cause manifested here using concrete details from the record.

6) Forensics Focus

  • Briefly explain how a dog-scent lineup is supposed to work and why it is scientifically controversial. What did courts and experts later conclude about John Preston’s methods?
  • Contrast the dog-scent claims with the DNA results from the T-shirt. What does this reveal about hierarchies of scientific reliability and the need to preserve testable evidence?

7) Impact and Effects

  • How did the wrongful conviction affect Dillon (time served, re-entry, compensation, stigma)?
  • What are the broader community effects when the actual perpetrator isn’t held accountable?

8) Summary

  • What is the single most important lesson from Dillon’s case for preventing wrongful convictions today?
  • Propose one concrete policy you would implement (who does it; how it will be measured).

Submission

Upload your completed Case Study Assignment to the Case Study 2: William Dillon assignment folder no later than Sunday, 11:59 p.m. Include citations and link to primary sources when possible.

Starter Sources (expand beyond these):• National Registry of Exonerations — William Dillon (case narrative, evidence timeline).• Innocence Project and Innocence Project of Florida — case pages, litigation updates.• Court filings and orders related to vacatur and dismissal; news coverage of DNA testing on the T-shirt.• Scholarly/forensic critiques of dog-scent lineups and testimony.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Thinking Instructions Please write a reflection to this week’s chapter readings must be a full college level paragraph length (200-250 words, roughly 7 complete sentences) to be accepted. Generate a l

Thinking Instructions Please write a reflection to this week’s chapter readings must be a full college level paragraph length (200-250 words, roughly 7 complete sentences) to be accepted. Generate a list of at least two courses you are taking now that you think would routinely practice analytical thinking. Now, think

Infographic Assignment Instructions Purpose: This assignment challenges you to visually present a key issue in victimology in a clear, concise, and informative way. You’ll choose a topic, research it,

Infographic Assignment Instructions Purpose: This assignment challenges you to visually present a key issue in victimology in a clear, concise, and informative way. You’ll choose a topic, research it, and turn your findings into an infographic that could be shared with a general audience, such as students, policymakers, or victim support

Infographic Assignment Instructions Purpose: This assignment challenges you to visually present a key issue in victimology in a clear, concise, and informative way. You’ll choose a topic, research it,

Infographic Assignment Instructions Purpose: This assignment challenges you to visually present a key issue in victimology in a clear, concise, and informative way. You’ll choose a topic, research it, and turn your findings into an infographic that could be shared with a general audience, such as students, policymakers, or victim support

Notetaking Instructions Please write a reflection to this week’s chapter readings must be a full college level paragraph length (200-250 words, roughly 7 complete sentences) to be accepted. Do you cur

NotetakingInstructions Please write a reflection to this week’s chapter readings must be a full college level paragraph length (200-250 words, roughly 7 complete sentences) to be accepted. Do you currently have a preferred way to take notes? When did you start using it? Has it been effective? What other strategy

Instructions Please write a reflection to this week’s chapter readings must be a full college level paragraph length (200-250 words, roughly 7 complete sentences) to be accepted. Please answer the fol

Instructions Please write a reflection to this week’s chapter readings must be a full college level paragraph length (200-250 words, roughly 7 complete sentences) to be accepted. Please answer the following in your reflection: What is the exact goal Academic Goal that you are trying to accomplish this year? How

Create a literature review of 10 sources in order to refine and validate the questions for the questionnaire QUESTIONNAIRE ATTACHED. Submission Instructions: The literature review is to be clear and

Create a literature review of 10 sources in order to refine and validate the questions for the questionnaire  QUESTIONNAIRE ATTACHED. Submission Instructions: The literature review is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling. The literature review should be formatted per current APA

Reflect critically on the strengths and weaknesses of this module’s readings in regards to inequality and privilege. Include your view on the ideas put forth in the lecture materials.3 pages (not incl

Reflect critically on the strengths and weaknesses of this module’s readings in regards to inequality and privilege. Include your view on the ideas put forth in the lecture materials. 3 pages (not including the reference page, no title page needed). READINGS : Barak, G., Leighton, P., & Cotton, A. (2018).

1ST PAPER: Chapter 1 & 2 Reflect critically on the strengths and weaknesses of this module’s readings in regards to crime control and criminology. Include your view on the ideas put forth in the

1ST PAPER: Chapter 1 & 2  Reflect critically on the strengths and weaknesses of this module’s readings in regards to crime control and criminology. Include your view on the ideas put forth in the lecture materials. 3 pages (not including the reference page, no title page needed). Submission Instructions: The

Part 2: You will write a critical review that synthesizes your reactions to the two articles. Your paper must be APA style (e.g., title page, no abstract, double-spaced, reference page). The paper sho

Part 2: You will write a critical review that synthesizes your reactions to the two articles. Your paper must be APA style (e.g., title page, no abstract, double-spaced, reference page). The paper should be 800-1000 words. Please use the following organization. The first section should include a general summary of the studies

Many agree that cannabis prohibition in the US has done much more harm than good. Fischer et al. underscore several important research areas which might yield evidence important for constructing polic

Many agree that cannabis prohibition in the US has done much more harm than good. Fischer et al. underscore several important research areas which might yield evidence important for constructing policy aimed at reversing some of the harms from prohibition. Which of these areas seemed most important to you? Moreover,

Alternative Research Assignment: Writing Assignment on Peer Reviewed Article. Guidelines for paper. This assignment is submitted in two parts. Both parts are submitted directly to your instructor. Eac

Alternative Research Assignment: Writing Assignment on Peer Reviewed Article. Guidelines for paper. This assignment is submitted in two parts. Both parts are submitted directly to your instructor. Each part is equivalent to two hours of research credit (25 points for each part, in order to achieve a total of 50