Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Question

Journal Assignment:

If you’re a member of the Prosecution, you will write 300 words or more for your journal,
laying out the best evidence to convict William Bradfield. If you are Defense, write 300 more
words laying out the best evidence to find him innocent. If you are on team Jury, you will do
300 words on each (600 total). Present your case as an extended argument, convincing
yourself (and your classmates) why whatever you believe is the objective truth.

Below is an optional set of instructions/prompts to help you build and organize your cases
for the journal and best practices, such as Prosecution offering discovery to the Defense.
Also attached is guides for Opening Statements and How to handle Objections. Email me if
you have any questions.

Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Prosecution:

1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

o What key pieces of evidence/witnesses from these pages are most crucial to
your case? List and explain why they are important to proving the defendant’s
guilt.

o Are there any potential weaknesses/counterarguments related to the
evidence that you need to address preemptively?

o Identify any connections between pieces of evidence/witnesses that could
strengthen your argument or create a narrative thread for the jury.

o You must email a copy of this called “discovery” to the defense attorneys a
week before the trial.

2. Building Your Argument:

o How will you introduce the case and engage the jury’s attention? Think about
how to establish the facts clearly and persuasively from the outset.

o What points do you intend to make to convince the jury of the defendant’s
guilt? Outline them in a logical sequence.

o Ensure each point logically leads to the next. How can you make sure your
argument is cohesive and flows naturally as you walk the jury through the
evidence.

o For example, you should establish that a crime was committed before
arguing there was a conspiracy and only after that what part the accused
played in that conspiracy.

3. Rhetorical Strategy:

o What rhetorical devices will you use to persuade the jury? Consider ethos,
pathos, and logos, and how each can strengthen your argument. Ethos
focuses on the speaker’s credibility, pathos appeals to emotions, and logos
relies on logic and reason.

o Consider how you will respond to any potential rebuttals or defenses raised
by the opposing side.

4. Required Writing:

o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Defense:

1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

o What traces make good evidence in the case? What evidence/witnesses
might support your argument that the defendant is innocent, or what can you
use to cast doubt on the prosecution’s case?

o Receive and read the prosecution’s discovery. Review the prosecution’s case
as detailed in their discovery. Are there any pieces of evidence you can
discredit or reinterpret? How will you challenge the reliability or credibility of
the evidence presented?

o What inconsistencies or gaps in the evidence can you highlight to weaken the
prosecution’s argument?

2. Building Your Argument:

o How will you open your defense to the jury? Think about how to introduce the
idea that reasonable doubt exists.

o What are the primary points you need to make to show the defendant’s
innocence or cast doubt on their guilt? Structure these points logically.

o How will you ensure your argument flows clearly, with each point supporting
the next and culminating in a strong conclusion?

3. Rhetorical Strategy:

o How will you use rhetoric to create empathy for the defendant and engage
the jury emotionally? What tone will you adopt to convey sincerity and
credibility?

o How can you use ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the jury of your
argument’s merit? Ethos focuses on the speaker’s credibility, pathos appeals
to emotions, and logos relies on logic and reason.

o What preemptive counterarguments can you anticipate from the
prosecution, and how will you respond to them?

4. Required Writing:

o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

Yuzu Reader: Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Submitting Poster for Faculty Review

 Submitting Poster for Faculty Review It is not enough to simply implement your project, but you must also share. This is an integral part of the implementation process, you must disseminate the information (or share the information with the relevant stakeholders).   For this Assignment, you will construct a Poster

Nursing

Post a summary on how predictive analytics might be used to support healthcare. Note: These topics may overlap as you will find in the readings (e.g., some processes require both Data Mining and Analytics). In your post include the following: Describe a practical application for predictive analytics in your nursing

policy PPT

Assig Nursing is a very highly regulated profession. There are over 100 boards of nursing and national nursing associations throughout the United States and its territories. Their existence helps regulate, inform, and promote the nursing profession. With such numbers, it can be difficult to distinguish between BONs and nursing associations,

POLICY

POLICY What are legislators currently doing to address your selected advocacy priorities for a vulnerable population? Are there current policies in place? Are there current policies proposed at either the state or federal level? What are the most obvious strengths and weaknesses of these policies as they relate to your

Improving Medication Reconciliation Accuracy at Admission and Discharge

See attachment In collaboration with the approved clinical preceptor, students will identify a specific evidence-based topic for the capstone project change proposal. Students should consider the clinical environment in which they are currently employed or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational

Study Plan

Study Plan Based on your practice exam question results from Week 2, identify strengths and areas of opportunity and create a tailored study plan to use throughout this course to help you prepare for the national certification exam. This will serve as an action plan to help you track your

Executive Summary

Executive Summary During this course, you will be tasked with completing an Executive Summary. The goal of an Executive Summary is to summarize your DNP project, highlighting key points. Please carefully review all instructions, and use the proper checklists and templates, to effectively complete your Executive Summary.   This will

Question

Density Determination Lab – YouTube You are to listen to the video, write down pertinent and useful information and provide a 2-3 page summary of the experiment discussed. Your write-up should include- a) introduction b) materials used c) procedure d) data presented e) discussion f) conclusion. You are to listen

Reflection

Please reflect and write your reflections on the following:   1. What content in this course helped you strengthen your concept of yourself as a PMHNP? Case studies 2. What do you find yourself thinking about as you prepare to start clinical? Class: Transition to practice

Case scenario

hello look attachment WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT (covers weeks 3-6)  SCENARIO 1  What are the  errors in the following prescriptions (1 per prescription)? Rewrite each prescription correctly. What is each medication classification? What is the mechanism of action (MOA)?  · Ubrelvy 200 mg PO at onset of migraine #30 0 RF  · memantine/donepezil (Sinemet) 7/10 mg po once daily #30 1 RF  · Stalevo 200 mg po TID

Research in nursing

Research project: A nursing research paper is a thesis-driven academic paper that is written on a specific nursing topic, by providing evidence supporting a specific topic. Using your clinical practice, nursing education, evaluation, or using nursing methodology can also help when writing a nursing research paper. The process follows systematic

Research in Nursing

Research project: A nursing research paper is a thesis-driven academic paper that is written on a specific nursing topic, by providing evidence supporting a specific topic. Using your clinical practice, nursing education, evaluation, or using nursing methodology can also help when writing a nursing research paper. The process follows systematic

need a response

please respond ro the discussion post attached. Follow the instructions and rubric. Randomized Controlled Trial Example and Ethical Analysis Article selection and criteria confirmation The article I have chosen is a peer-reviewed journal and a pilot, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial published in the British Journal of Nutrition in April 2024. The paper

wk4

Week 4 Case Study Pt is a 48 year old female working as an accountant. Chief Complaint: “I suddenly felt short of breath and my chest hurts when I breathe.” Onset: 2 hours before arrival Past Medical History: • Hypertension • Obesity (BMI 34) • Varicose veins Medications: • Hydrochlorothiazide

help with home work

Nus 504 unit 10 journal Kaltura/Self-Reflection: Please add the talking point , I will do the recording Using the Kaltura platform, discuss your thoughts on evidence-based practice. In 2–3 minutes, please address the following: · How will your understanding of evidence-based practice guide your decision-making through the intentional integration of

Alignment

 Alignment Alignment ensures our goals, our actions, our plans, and our strategies align with the goals, culture, values, and mission of our organization. Understanding how alignment works enables us to ensure the plans we enact align with the competencies and domains outlined by organization.   In this Assignment, you will