Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Nursing Assignment Instructions attached

Module 3: 
Probability

With the data presented here and in your readings in this module : 

· Express in probability terms the probability of each variable (age, height, weight, & BMI) 

· In the following graphs, with the additional data, mark the possible value of the mean in the graph of age, height, weight, BMI  

Descriptive Statistics  

   

AGE  

HEIGHT  

WEIGHT  

BMI  

Valid  

 

69  

 

69  

 

69  

 

69  

 

Missing  

 

0  

 

0  

 

0  

 

0  

 

Mean  

 

45.928  

 

1.689  

 

78.837  

 

27.552  

 

Std. Deviation  

 

9.753  

 

0.068  

 

14.984  

 

4.602  

 

Minimum  

 

27.000  

 

1.570  

 

45.900  

 

17.070  

 

Maximum  

 

71.000  

 

1.930  

 

144.000  

 

45.450  

 

 

Statology.org. (2018). 
Z table. 

to an external site.

Statology.org. (2021). How to rind probability given a mean and standard deviation. 

·
Distribution plots

·  
Distribution plots

 

 

 

 

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm ET on Sunday.

· Contribute a minimum of 2 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

 

·

File Upload

·

Studio

·

Google Drive

·

Office 365

Top of Form

Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded.

Drag a file here, or

Choose a file to upload

<=”” div=”” style=”margin: 10px 0px;”>

I agree to the tool’s 

End-User License Agreement

This assignment submission is my own, original work

*

 

Bottom of Form

Rubric

– Official Assignment Rubric

– Official Assignment Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism

Concept Application

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar

Written Communication

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentExcellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodMinimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors

16 to >14.0 ptsFairMultiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorSevere (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableUnacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication

Specific Formatting

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking

Thought analysis process

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy

Quality of Sources and APA Citations

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

Total Points: 100

image4.png

image1.png

image2.png

image3.png

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

JOURNAL ENTRY

Journal Entry   JOURNAL ENTRY Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you to identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills, while also recognizing your strengths and successes. Use this Journal to reflect on your clinical

Treatments for Respiratory Disorders

Describe causes of Upper respiratory infections and drug therapy  Discuss triggers of asthma and treatment options Discuss corticosteroids  Describe chronic bronchitis and treatment options

Mm PowerPoint week 5

Mm week 5 ppt Implementing a Nurse-Led Fall Risk Assessment and Prevention Program to Reduce Falls Among Older Adults in an Adult Day Care Setting Student Name Course Name Instructor Name Institution Date Problem Description Falls among older adults remain a leading cause of injury, hospitalization, and loss of independence

Mitz soap week 5

Mitz soap week 5 Initial Psychiatric Interview/SOAP Note Template There are different ways in which to complete a Psychiatric SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) Note. This is a template that is meant to guide you as you continue to develop your style of SOAP in the psychiatric practice setting.

Nursing

Post a response including the following: What are the characteristics of the research study (Tzeng & Yin, 2017), the quality improvement study (Khoja & Moosa, 2023), and the DNP project (Bangura, 2024) in terms of generalizability, sampling, and the nature of ethical protections?  Compare and contrast ethical considerations in research

MR soap week 5

Mr soap week 5 SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

question

Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities There is a saying that “people must look back in order to look forward.” As you transition out of this practicum, finish your program, and look forward to your career beyond the program, you must “look back” at all that you have accomplished, taking stock

Nursing

To Prepare Review the resources provided in the Nursing Informatics Competencies.  By Day 3 of Week 10 Post a cohesive response to the following: Consider all that you already knew and what you have learned in this class. What are the key informatics competencies that you feel every nurse should

home work

Competency Compare research methodologies. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane. Scenario You are enrolled in an undergraduate nursing research course while obtaining your BSN. In preparation

PHI-#5

Please see attached Complete the Case Study: Tonya Archer media activity, which is linked later in this assessment. Before you begin creating your submission for this assessment, make sure you have worked through the Tonya Archer case study. This will provide the foundational context for the assessment, for which you

Safety and Quality #4

Please see attached. Imagine you are a member of a Quality Improvement Council at any type of health care system, whether acute, ambulatory, home health, managed care, et cetera. Your Council has identified that newly hired nurses would benefit from comprehensive training on the importance of nursing-sensitive quality indicators. The

Duscussion help x2

   801 A Discussion Post # 1: Please provide practical advice and tools to help tackle the change leader’s challenge? 801 A Discussion Post # 2: What would you do if you were Odiotti and Seiberlich?

Speak over ppt

Case Study Introduction Please include a brief introduction Case Scenario: Patient Name: Diagnosis: Background: Mental Status Assessment Perception Thought Process Content of thought Judgment Insight Cognition Selected Therapy Please include a description and the goals of the therapy of your choice. Selected Therapy Why did you select this therapy for

NUR507W4

DISCUSSION: Discuss a dermatologic disorder (ECZEMA) and its treatment modalities. Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  · All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible. INSTRUCTIONS: · Your

Nursing Week 6_Assignment_DNP855

 Developing teams is essential for providing healthcare that is patient-centered, safe, timely, effective, efficient, and equitable. 

Journal Response Week 6

 Building a successful team is about finding the right mix of people and professional skills.   Overview In this module, you will examine the dynamics of group decision-making and how to build successful teams. Building a successful team is about finding the right mix of people and professional skills. This