READ BELOW-
This course changed how I think about translation science and evidence-based practice.
Before NR716, I primarily viewed evidence-based practice as finding relevant articles and
summarizing their key points. Through this course, I learned that evidence alone does not
lead to practice change. Even strong evidence can fail if there is no consideration of
workflow, staL buy-in, or sustainability. Learning about translation and implementation
science helped me understand that my role as a DNP-prepared nurse is to intentionally
apply evidence to everyday practice using structured approaches, rather than merely
understanding the research itself (McNett et al., 2021).
My thinking was also challenged in the area of summary versus analysis and synthesis.
Previously, I focused on summarizing individual studies. This course required me to
synthesize evidence by comparing findings across multiple studies, identifying themes,
and determining what the overall body of evidence means for practice. This deeper level of
thinking helped me see why evidence-based interventions must be built on the total
evidence base rather than a single strong article. It also reinforced the importance of being
systematic and transparent when using evidence to support a practice change project
(Randles & Finnegan, 2023).
Overall, this learning has better prepared me to practice as a DNP-prepared nurse. I now
feel more confident in my ability to translate evidence into realistic, measurable
interventions that fit within clinical settings. I also have a stronger understanding of the
importance of evaluating outcomes and planning for sustainability. This course
strengthened my ability to lead evidence-based practice changes that improve patient care
and support long-term improvements in healthcare systems (McNett et al., 2021).
Instructions below-
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue
a. Respond to the above post by furthering dialogue by providing more information, thereby
adding more depth to the discussion.
A scholarly source is (a) evidence-based, (b) peer-reviewed, and (c) published in the last
five (5) years.
Professionalism in Communication
a. References are consistent with APA style/formatting with no error patterns; the hanging
indent is not required.
b. Presents information in an organized manner.
c. Uses clear and concise language.
d. Communicates with no error patterns in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and
punctuation
Writing Requirements (APA style/formatting)
· In-text citations
· Reference list in correct APA style/formatting
· Standard English usage and mechanics
· A scholarly source is (a) evidence-based, (b) peer-reviewed, and (c) published in the last
five (5) years.
· Response post(s) may require a scholarly citation and reference.
