Human Resource Management

Purpose

To evaluate your ability to conduct comprehensive capital investment analysis using discounted cash flow techniques, synthesize economic and financial factors, and develop strategic investment recommendations based on quantitative financial modeling and qualitative business considerations.

Associated Skills

·
Discounted cash flow analysis and valuation techniques (NPV, IRR, PI)

·
Capital budgeting and investment decision-making

·
Cash flow projection and financial modeling

·
Economic factor analysis and market trend evaluation

·
Financial position assessment and capital structure analysis

·
Risk assessment and mitigation strategy development

·
Sensitivity analysis and scenario planning

·
Professional investment recommendation presentation

·
Integration of quantitative and qualitative decision factors

Overview

This comprehensive assignment requires you to analyze a capital investment opportunity for an organization, applying various financial analysis techniques with a focus on discounted cash flow methods. This assessment will demonstrate your ability to evaluate economic factors, analyze financial positions, apply decision tools, assess budgeting implications, and make recommendations based on discounted cash flow analysis.

Discounted Cash Flow Technique Report Details

You will take on the role of a financial analyst tasked with evaluating a significant capital investment opportunity for one of the following companies (select the same company you analyzed in Unit 2):

1. Apple Inc. (Technology Sector) – Considering a $2 billion investment in developing advanced AI technology for next-generation products

2. Walmart Inc. (Retail Sector) – Evaluating a $1.5 billion investment in automated warehouse technology

3. Delta Air Lines (Transportation Sector) – Analyzing a $1.8 billion investment in fuel-efficient aircraft

4. Johnson & Johnson (Healthcare Sector) – Contemplating a $2.2 billion investment in new pharmaceutical research facilities

Your task is to conduct a thorough analysis and provide a recommendation to the executive team regarding this potential capital investment.

Required Components

Your analysis and recommendation report should include the following sections:

1. Economic Factor Analysis

Analyze how current economic factors (inflation rates, interest rates, market trends, industry growth projections) might impact this investment decision for your chosen company. Consider both macroeconomic and industry-specific factors that could affect the success of this investment. (150-200 words)

2. Organizational Financial Position Analysis

Leverage the financial analysis you completed in Unit 2 for your chosen company. Expand this analysis to specifically evaluate whether the company is financially positioned to undertake the proposed capital investment. Reference key findings from your previous analysis and incorporate additional financial metrics relevant to capital investment decisions. (200-300 words)

Use the SEC 10-K document from the SEC  for your chosen company:

· Apple Inc.

· Walmart Inc.

· Delta Air Lines

· Johnson & Johnson

3. Financial Decision Tool Application

Discuss appropriate financial decision tools to evaluate the investment options for your chosen company, including break-even analysis, contribution margin analysis, and cost-volume-profit analysis. Explain how these tools inform your understanding of the investment opportunity. (100-150 words)

4. Budgeting System Implications

Assess how this investment would impact your chosen organization’s budgeting system. Consider capital budgeting processes, operational budget adjustments, and cash flow management implications based on the company’s current financial structure. (100-150 words)

5. Cash Flow Projections

Develop detailed cash flow projections for the investment over a 10-year period. Clearly state all assumptions regarding:

· Initial investment costs

· Projected revenues

· Operating expenses

· Maintenance costs

· Salvage value

· Tax implications

· Working capital requirements

Present these projections in a well-organized table with explanations for key assumptions. Ensure your projections align with the financial realities of your chosen company. (100-150 words plus tables)

6. Discounted Cash Flow Analysis 

Apply multiple discounted cash flow techniques to evaluate the investment opportunity:

· Net Present Value (NPV) calculation with justification for the discount rate used

· Internal Rate of Return (IRR) calculation and interpretation

· Profitability Index (PI) calculation and interpretation

· Payback period and discounted payback period

Compare and contrast the results from these different techniques and explain any discrepancies. (200-300 words)

7. Comprehensive Recommendation

Based on your analysis, provide a comprehensive recommendation to the executive team of your chosen company. Your recommendation should:

· Clearly state whether to proceed with the investment.

· Summarize the key financial findings that support your recommendation.

· Address potential risks and mitigation strategies.

· Consider non-financial factors that might influence the decision.

· Outline implementation considerations if the project is approved.

· Suggest alternative approaches if applicable.

Your recommendation should be well-reasoned and supported by both quantitative and qualitative evidence. (100-150 words)

Submission Guidelines

1. Format your report professionally with appropriate headings, subheadings, and page numbers.

2. Include an executive summary (100-150 words) at the beginning of your report.

3. Include all calculations, tables, and graphs within the body of the report or as appendices.

4. Cite all sources using APA format.

5. Submit your completed report as a PDF document.

6. Total word count should be approximately 800-1000 words (excluding tables, graphs, and references).

Resources to Support Your Analysis

1. Discounted Cash Flow Techniques: Review the fundamentals of NPV, IRR, and PI calculations at Corporate Finance Institute

2. Sensitivity Analysis Methods: Learn about effective sensitivity analysis approaches at Harvard Business Review

3. Capital Budgeting Best Practices: Explore industry standards for capital budgeting at McKinsey & Company

4. Financial Ratio Analysis: Refresh your understanding of key financial ratios at Investopedia

5. Economic Factor Analysis: Learn how to incorporate economic factors into investment decisions at Federal Reserve Economic Data

6. Industry-Specific Resources:

· Technology Sector (Apple): Gartner Technology Research

· Retail Sector (Walmart): National Retail Federation

· Transportation Sector (Delta): International Air Transport Association

· Healthcare Sector (Johnson & Johnson): Healthcare Financial Management Association

Evaluation Criteria

Your assignment will be evaluated based on:

· Accuracy and thoroughness of economic factor analysis

· Quality of financial position analysis and integration with Unit 2 work

· Appropriate application of financial decision tools

· Thoughtful assessment of budgeting implications

· Accuracy and clarity of cash flow projections

· Correct application of discounted cash flow techniques

· Depth and insight of sensitivity analysis

· Quality and justification of the final recommendation

· Professional presentation and organization

· Proper citation of sources

Criteria	Excellent	Proficient	Developing	Needs Improvement	Not Submitted	Criterion Score
Economic Factor Analysis	25 points Identifies and thoroughly analyzes 4+ economic factors clearly connected to investment decisions.	19 points Clearly analyzes 3 economic factors connected to investment decisions.	12 points Clearly analyzes 2 economic factors with basic connections to investment decisions.	6 points Analyzes fewer than 2 economic factors or unclear connections.	0 points Not submitted.	Score of Economic Factor Analysis, / 25
Organizational Financial Position Analysis	25 points Clearly analyzes 5+ financial metrics demonstrating financial capacity for investment.	19 points Clearly analyzes 4 financial metrics demonstrating financial capacity.	12 points Clearly analyzes 2-3 financial metrics, limited demonstration of financial capacity.	6 points Analyzes fewer than 2 metrics or demonstrates limited/incorrect capacity analysis.	0 points Not submitted.	Score of Organizational Financial Position Analysis, / 25
Financial Decision Tools Application	25 points Clearly applies all 3 financial decision tools (break-even, contribution margin, CVP) accurately.	19 points Clearly applies 2 financial decision tools accurately.	12 points Clearly applies 1 financial decision tool accurately.	6 points Unclear or incorrect application of tools.	0 points Not submitted.	Score of Financial Decision Tools Application, / 25
Budgeting System Implications	25 points Clearly assesses 3+ budgeting implications (capital budgeting, operational budgets, cash flow).	19 points Clearly assesses 2 budget implications.	12 points Clearly assesses 1 budgeting implication.	6 points Unclear or incorrect assessment of budgeting implications.	0 points Not submitted.	Score of Budgeting System Implications, / 25
Cash Flow Projections	25 points Clearly presents comprehensive 10-year cash flow projections, clearly states and justifies 5+ assumptions.	19 points Clearly presents projections, clearly states and justifies 3-4 assumptions.	12 points Basic projections, clearly state and justifies 1-2 assumptions.	6 points Projections unclear, incorrect, or assumptions missing.	0 points Not submitted.	Score of Cash Flow Projections, / 25
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis	25 points Clearly and accurately calculates and interprets NPV, IRR, PI, payback period (4 metrics), justifies discount rate.	19 points Clearly calculates and interprets 3 metrics, provides discount rate justification.	12 points Clearly calculates and interprets 2 metrics, limited discount rate justification.	6 points Calculates fewer than 2 metrics, unclear interpretation or missing discount rate justification.	0 points Not submitted.	Score of Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, / 25
Comprehensive Recommendation	25 points Clearly provides recommendations with 4+ elements (decision, financial evidence, risks, non-financial factors, implementation).	19 points Clearly provides recommendations with 3 elements.	12 points Clearly provides recommendations for 2 elements.	6 points Provides unclear recommendation or includes fewer than 2 elements.	0 points Not submitted.	Score of Comprehensive Recommendation, / 25
Skills	25 points The student skillfully and consistently integrates relevant skills into the assignment. Application is accurate, contextually appropriate, and enhances the depth or originality of the assignment. Demonstrates mastery through insightful use of skills.	19 points The student applies relevant skills accurately and appropriately. The use of skills supports key ideas or analysis and demonstrates a strong understanding. Integration is effective but may lack the depth or originality of a mastery-level response.	12 points The student applies relevant skills inconsistently or with partial success. Connections to the assignment may be unclear, generalized, or only loosely aligned with the topic. Demonstrates a basic understanding but limited integration.	6 points The student attempts to apply relevant skills but with evident inaccuracies, oversimplifications, or weak alignment with the assignment content. Demonstrates limited awareness and understanding.	0 points No meaningful application of relevant skills is present in the