500-750 with References
History and Perception of Inclusion Reference List and Reflection – Rubric
Part 1: Research 34 points
Criteria Description
Part 1: Research
5. Target 34 points
All sources are compelling, proficiently relate to the research topic, and are from
within the last five years. Includes substantial variety of resource types.
4. Acceptable 29.58 points
All sources are credible, appropriately relate to the research topic, and are from
within the last five years. Includes considerable variety of resource types.
3. Approaching 25.16 points
Most of the sources are credible, minimally relate to the research topic, and are
from within the last five years. Includes partially incomplete variety of resource
types.
2. Insufficient 23.46 points
Missing some sources; or some of the sources are not credible, adequate, or from
within the last five years. Includes insufficient variety of resource types.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Collapse All
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Part 2: Re�ection 25.5 points
Criteria Description
Part 2: Reflection
5. Target 25.5 points
Reflection realistically describes the area of special education and the impetus for
going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students with
disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is convincing.
4. Acceptable 22.19 points
Reflection accurately describes the area of special education and the impetus for
going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students with
disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is logical.
3. Approaching 18.87 points
Reflection ambiguously describes the area of special education and the impetus for
going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students with
disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is shallow.
2. Insufficient 17.6 points
Reflection does not realistically describe the area of special education and the
impetus for going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students
with disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is
unconvincing.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Organization 8.5 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Target 8.5 points
The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas
related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the
audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Acceptable 7.4 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The
content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
3. Approaching 6.29 points
The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a
sense of the main idea.
2. Insufficient 5.86 points
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The
ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Format/Documentation 8.5 points
Criteria Description
Format/Documentation (Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college,
subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,
bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.)
5. Target 8.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of
direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable 7.4 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 6.29 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
2. Insufficient 5.86 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing 8.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language
use, sentence structure, etc.)
5. Target 8.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 7.4 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 6.29 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
2. Insufficient 5.86 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Total 85 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.