OSH 324 – Construction Safety Management 80 points
Project – Due Thursday, April 13, 2022
Purpose: Address Safety hazards for Bid document
Expected outcome: The student will gain
a basic comprehension of hazards associated with a specific job,
evaluate the hazards,
research solutions
and state recommendations. The student will
communicate findings through a mix of brevity and thoroughness.
Rubric Outcomes:
|
· Have abilities to design and evaluate safety and health programs applicable to industrial environments |
|
· Have the ability to identify and apply applicable standards, regulations, and codes |
Outline:
·
Cover page – with student name, class name and number, and name of site
· Table of Contents
· Introductions – briefly discuss the project and why you chose the hazards listed. (1/2 page at most)
· List and briefly describe the chosen 10 hazards – 1 hazard must include a demolition hazard and 2 must include IH hazards
· Perform Risk Assessment to identify the top hazards using the provided Risk Assessment Matrix
· Use research when determining probability and severity – do not guess. You must cite your references.
· Once the top 3 hazards are identified, describe them in detail and include your companies plan to control the hazards.
· Minimum of 1 page for each
· Must have references for each (minimum of two)
· Should address regulations at a minimum
· Controls should also follow Hierarchy of controls
· Be sure to provide a bibliography listing your source(s) and provide in text citations.
Rubric is on the next page.
|
Rubric: |
Exceeds Expectations (5) |
Meet Expectations (4) |
Below Expectations (3) |
Not acceptable (1) |
Score__ /30 |
|
Cover Page |
Has all required elements |
Has 3 of the required elements |
Has 2 of the required elements |
No cover letter |
|
|
Table of contents |
Has ToC |
Does not have ToC |
|||
|
Articulation of ideas – written |
Articulates ideas clearly and concisely |
Articulates idea but writings somewhat disjointed and difficult to follow |
Text rambles, points made are only understood with repeated reading and key points are not organized |
Not done well |
|
|
Professionalism/Organization – written |
Use of good professional writing style and organized written material in a logical sequence to enhance the reader’s comprehension |
Good writing style but not consistent. Generally organized well but paragraphs combine multiple thoughts or section are not clearly identified |
Style is informal or in appropriate, jargon is used, improper voice. Some structure and organization is used |
The writing style is inappropriate for the audience and for the assignment. Little or no structure is used |
|
|
Quality of Work – Written |
Written work is presented neatly and professionally, grammar and spelling are correct. Correct sentence structure and paragraphs. |
Written work is presented neatly with minor errors |
Works is not neat, multiple errors |
Works is not presented neatly though more than 1/3rd of the paper |
|
|
References |
Alphabetized & numbered; referenced within document by parenthesized number (1). There should be several references. |
Has references, not all are referenced within the document. |
Has references but not referenced within the document |
No references |
|
|
Rubric: |
Exceeds Expectations (10) |
Meet Expectations (8) |
Below Expectations (4) |
Not acceptable (0-1) |
Score__/20 |
|
Introduction |
Articulates ideas clearly and concisely |
Articulates idea but writings somewhat disjointed and difficult to follow |
Text rambles, points made are only understood with repeated reading and key points are not organized |
Not done well |
|
|
Rubric: |
Exceeds Expectations (20) |
Meet Expectations (15) |
Below Expectations (10) |
Not acceptable (0-5) |
Score__/40 |
|
Risk Assessment |
Articulates ideas clearly and concisely. Determines Risk based on Severity and probability with detailed referenced information supporting the score |
Articulates idea but writings somewhat disjointed and difficult to follow. Determines Risk based on Severity and probability with detailed referenced information supporting the score. |
Text rambles, points made are only understood with repeated reading and key points are not organized. Determines Risk based on Severity and probability little information as to how the score was determined. |
Not done well and does not meet requirements. |
|
|
Hazard description/safe operating procedure with controls. |
Articulates hazards and ideas clearly and concisely. Meets all requirements listed on page 1 |
Articulates idea but writings somewhat disjointed and difficult to follow. Meets all but one of the requirements listed on page 1 |
Text rambles, points made are only understood with repeated reading and key points are not organized. Does not meet two or more of the requirements listed on page 1. |
Not done well and does not meet requirements. |
Probability:
·
High– Very likely to occur, protective measures are nearly worthless or non-existent
·
Medium-Occurrence is likely. The frequency of control measures is significant or control measures are inadequate
·
Moderate-Occurrence is possible, but not likely
·
Low– Occurrence is so unlikely as to be considered nearly zero.
Severity:
·
Severe-Death or serious debilitating long-term injury such as amputation or coma
·
Serious-Permanent or nonreversible injury that severely impact enjoyment of life and may require continued treatment
·
Moderate-Permanent or reversible minor injury that does not significantly impact enjoyment of life, but requires medical treatment.
·
Slight-Reversible injury requiring simple medical treatment with no confinement
