Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Diversity 3

need help with draft question

Module Three Activity Guidelines and Rubric.html

IDS 400 Module Three Activity Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

For this activity, you will critically analyze how those within your chosen population engage with your topic. You will identify what is already working well and opportunities for change. Completing this activity will result in a draft of the critical analysis section of your project. It also provides an opportunity to obtain valuable feedback from your instructor that you can incorporate into your project submission.

Directions

In this activity, you will consider the elements of your topic you can develop to encourage, promote, and transform conversations about diversity. Include diverse perspectives from varied sources to support your points. You should continue to gather the sources you will integrate into your final project, which include two resources from course materials and two resources from the library. Look to the SNHU Shapiro Library for assistance in finding evidence and resources from outside the course. For this activity, you will discuss how to collaborate constructively with your chosen population group. You will then describe at least one positive element related to your topic and, finally, one element that could benefit from change.

You are not required to answer each question below the rubric criteria but may use them to better understand the criteria and guide your thinking.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

  1. Integrate reliable evidence from varied sources throughout your paper to support your analysis.
    1. It is important to draw from a more diverse pool of perspectives from varied sources to support the analysis. This is different from the Citations and Attributions rubric criterion.
    2. Reliable evidence from varied sources should be interwoven throughout the paper itself, while citing and attributing sources will be represented as APA in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your work.
    3. You will be evaluated on both criteria.
  2. Discuss how you would constructively collaborate with your population to encourage their engagement with your chosen topic.
    1. Consider how you would develop a dialogue with your population about the topic you have chosen. What are your ideas for supporting constructive and inclusive conversation and programs of engagement?
  3. Describe at least one positive element within your topic that supports transformation.
    1. What conversational and collaborative approaches have already been successful? Visualize how this positive element could have a ripple effect towards a transformative conversation about your topic. This is not simply your opinion but should be supported by reliable evidence.
    2. If you do not think your topic has been engaged with positively or successfully, explain why you have come to this conclusion.
  4. Describe at least one specific element within your topic that could benefit from change.
    1. What potential opportunities are there to improve your topic? What could be done differently to encourage, promote, or transform your topic? Build off ways that your topic has been discussed and represented in the past. This is not simply your opinion but should be supported by reliable evidence.

What to Submit

Submit your short paper as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Consult the
Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations.

Module Three Activity Rubric

Criteria Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Reliable Evidence from Varied Sources Integrates reliable evidence from varied sources throughout the paper to support analysis Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include drawing from a more diverse pool of perspectives, using more varied sources to support the analysis, or integrating evidence and sources throughout the paper to support the analysis Does not attempt criterion 20
Constructively Collaborate Discusses constructive collaboration with population to encourage their engagement with chosen topic Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing more detailed ideas for constructive collaboration or better supporting how those ideas will encourage engagement Does not attempt criterion 30
Positive Element Describes at least one positive element within the topic that supports transformation Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include connecting the positive element to transformation, providing more support of that connection, or explaining why the topic has not been engaged with positively Does not attempt criterion 20
Benefit from Change Describes at least one specific element within the topic that could benefit from change Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing more specific details about the element that could benefit from change or providing more support of why the element would benefit from change Does not attempt criterion 20
Articulation of Response Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas 5
Citations and Attributions Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution 5
Total: 100%

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

case4

Module 4 – Case HR Program Effectiveness; Employee Performance Management (Best Practices); Future of Talent Management Case Assignment (Signature Assignment: Critical thinking, Reinforced Level) After reading required materials in Module 4, review the following case (which is the same case read for SLP 4): Wirtz, J., & Heracleous, L. (2012). 

SLP4

Module 4 – SLP HR Program Effectiveness; Employee Performance Management (Best Practices); Future of Talent Management Assignment Overview After reading required materials in Module 4, review the following case (which is the same case read for Case 4): Wirtz, J., & Heracleous, L. (2012).  Singapore Airlines: Managing human resources for

Reflection 4

In the Module 4 Reflective Discussion, please reflect on everything you have learned in this course, by addressing the following:  Paragraphs 1-3:  Given the readings and assignments in the course, identify and discuss three important concepts applicable to your work experience, profession, and/or career plans for the future. Describe how

Benchmark 4

Benchmark #4: Project Report and/or Project Deliverable – Rough Draft(s)  I will send you the prior assignments that go along with this rough draft that you did for me prior to this draft. · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 200   · Submitting a file upload Please submit here a Rough Draft of

Human Resource Management 3 Assignment

Difference in Performance Review Imagine that you have an employee that rates themself very highly on their self-appraisal, but you know that their actual performance is very poor, and a have evaluated them accordingly in your managerial evaluation. How do you either bridge the gap or communicate the bad news?  

Human Resource Management

Purpose From your first assignment, you have a job description that details the important tasks and duties and KSAOs for the job you analyzed.  You will use that job title and job description for this assignment. For Assignment 2, you will demonstrate your understanding of job evaluation and pricing jobs

Individual Report Submission

Please see attached.  Example Individual Submission: Showcasing the Accessible Workplace Program LinkedIn Post Proud to share my work on the Accessible Workplace Program, a capstone project aimed at creating inclusive and supportive environments for employees with physical disabilities. I focused on redesigning job descriptions and developing onboarding strategies to ensure

Discussion 4 MR

On your TLC Home page, click on “Additional Library Resources” to access the IBISWorld Industry Research tool. · Click on “IBISWorld.” · Search “Business Coaching in the U.S.” · Click individually on the topics across the tan-colored ribbon above the “IBISWORLD Industry Report 61143” headline · Respond to the following:

Human Resource Management Assignment #6

The new benefit you propose must be something new and innovative. (The benefit should not be something already commonly offered as a benefit , e.g.: medical, dental, tuition reimbursement, etc.) Imagine that you are delivering this presentation to c-suite executives that are the decision-makers on the matter. Your objective is

Nov 4 Post about Long-term executive incentive

Please see attached.  List and describe five Long -Term Executive Incentives – Refer to Chapter 14 Compensation Of Special Groups The first part of Chapter 14 identifies and describes the unique characteristics that apply to special groups: · Supervisors · Corporate directors · Executives · Scientists and engineers (professionals) ·

benchmark 3

I have added benchmark 1 for your review.  There is no benchmark 2, so proceed with #3 Benchmark #3: Literature Review and Methodology  · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 150   · Submitting a file upload For Benchmark #3, please include the  most current, updated drafts of the following: 1. Your methodology section if

ogl 570 wk 2

OGL 570 Instructions In each module, you will have the opportunity to participate in an online discussion forum.  This week, you have a  choice of which prompt to respond to. Hot Tip:   It might be helpful to copy-paste the discussion prompts into an offline document (Word, for example), compose your responses

Module 3 Case

Module 3 – Case Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships Assignment Overview Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Reinforced Level In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be assessed at the “reinforced” level. The Quantitative Reasoning rubric will be useful for this purpose. In MGT511, quantitative reasoning skills were assessed at

module 3 SLP

Module 3 – SLP Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships 360-Degree Appraisal The 360-degree appraisal approach entails collecting performance information from several workers who interact with the employee being evaluated. For example, information can be collected from supervisors, subordinates, customers, and peers. In some situations, employees also evaluate their own

Module 2 ogl 551

Module 1: Learning Materials IMPORTANT NOTE :   Anything in the  “Learning Materials” content area  (excluding “Supplemental Learning Materials”)  is “fair game” for the quizzes(as is any other content presented in the module).  You’ll also be doing some analysis and synthesis types of writing in this graduate-level course, so be sure to read

Discussion 3

Discussion 3 A common form of training is cooperative training. There are two widely used cooperative training methods: internships and apprentice training. In both forms of training, there is a combination of classroom training (formal education) and on-the-job training (experience) that can be used for career development. Based on your

Human Resources

Job Interview.  [ NAME OF THE COMPANY ] JOB TITLE: [ ] FSLA EXEMPTION STATUS: [Exempt or Non-Exempt] JOB LOCATION: [City, State] WORK SCHEDULE: [Days, Time] OVERVIEW OF WORK: [Purpose of the position and general summary of the job] TASKS: [5-8 Statements of Tasks · · · · · ·