Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

diversity 4

help with draft question 

Module Four Activity Guidelines and Rubric.html

IDS 400 Module Four Activity Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

For this activity, you will consider influences on constructive engagement with your topic. You will also propose how your ideas to transform conversations about your topic might influence how we as a larger society perceive it. This activity contributes to your draft of the critical analysis section of your project. It also provides an opportunity to obtain valuable feedback from your instructor that you can incorporate into your project submission.

Directions

In this activity, you will work on the second part of the critical analysis of your topic in diversity. You should consider the feedback from your instructor on the previous activity and use your responses to inform this assignment. Throughout the process, you will support your analysis with reliable evidence from varied sources, which include at least two resources from course materials and two resources from the library. For this activity, you will assess factors that may influence engagement with your topic and then explain one potential obstacle that could interfere with constructive conversation about your topic. Finally, you will describe a possible outcome of your proposed engagement that might influence societal conversations about your topic.

You are not required to answer each question below the rubric criteria but may use them to better understand the criteria and guide your thinking.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

  1. Integrate reliable evidence from varied sources throughout your paper to support your analysis.
    1. It is important to draw from a more diverse pool of perspectives from varied sources to support the analysis. This is different from the Citations and Attributions rubric criterion.
    2. Reliable evidence from varied sources should be interwoven throughout the paper itself, while citing and attributing sources will be represented as APA in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your work.
    3. You will be evaluated on both criteria.
  2. Assess at least two significant factors that could affect your topic, such as biases, beliefs, assumptions, and/or values.
    1. In the previous activity, you identified positive elements in conversations about your topic and elements that might benefit from change. Now, determine factors that might influence how insiders and outsiders engage with your topic. What might change their perceptions of the topic or how they talk about it?
  3. Explain how at least one potential obstacle could interfere with the population’s engagement with your topic.
    1. In the previous activity, you identified conversational elements that present opportunities for change. Now, determine a possible obstacle that could interfere with this constructive engagement.
  4. Describe a possible outcome of your proposed engagement that might influence the societal conversations that add to critical awareness of diversity.
    1. You have critically examined how insiders and outsiders of your chosen population engage with your topic. How might your ideas for more constructive, transformative engagement impact how we, as a greater society, talk about your topic?

What to Submit

Submit your short paper as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Consult the
Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations.

Module Four Activity Rubric

Criteria Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Reliable Evidence from Varied Sources Integrates reliable evidence from varied sources throughout the paper to support analysis Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include drawing from a more diverse pool of perspectives, using more varied sources to support the analysis, or integrating evidence and sources throughout the paper to support the analysis Does not attempt criterion 20
Significant Factors Assesses at least two significant factors that could impact the topic, such as biases, beliefs, assumptions, and/or values Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include assessing at least two significant factors that could impact the topic or providing more support of the assessment Does not attempt criterion 20
Potential Obstacle Explains how at least one potential obstacle could interfere with the population’s engagement with the topic Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing more detailed explanation of the obstacle or providing more support of how the obstacle might interfere with the population’s engagement with the topic Does not attempt criterion 20
Societal Conversation Describes a possible outcome of the proposed engagement that might influence societal conversations that add to critical awareness of diversity Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing more details about how the critical analysis could influence societal conversations about the topic or how it might add to awareness of diversity Does not attempt criterion 30
Articulation of Response Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas 5
Citations and Attributions Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution 5
Total: 100%

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Benchmark 4

Benchmark #4: Project Report and/or Project Deliverable – Rough Draft(s)  I will send you the prior assignments that go along with this rough draft that you did for me prior to this draft. · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 200   · Submitting a file upload Please submit here a Rough Draft of

Human Resource Management 3 Assignment

Difference in Performance Review Imagine that you have an employee that rates themself very highly on their self-appraisal, but you know that their actual performance is very poor, and a have evaluated them accordingly in your managerial evaluation. How do you either bridge the gap or communicate the bad news?  

Human Resource Management

Purpose From your first assignment, you have a job description that details the important tasks and duties and KSAOs for the job you analyzed.  You will use that job title and job description for this assignment. For Assignment 2, you will demonstrate your understanding of job evaluation and pricing jobs

Individual Report Submission

Please see attached.  Example Individual Submission: Showcasing the Accessible Workplace Program LinkedIn Post Proud to share my work on the Accessible Workplace Program, a capstone project aimed at creating inclusive and supportive environments for employees with physical disabilities. I focused on redesigning job descriptions and developing onboarding strategies to ensure

Discussion 4 MR

On your TLC Home page, click on “Additional Library Resources” to access the IBISWorld Industry Research tool. · Click on “IBISWorld.” · Search “Business Coaching in the U.S.” · Click individually on the topics across the tan-colored ribbon above the “IBISWORLD Industry Report 61143” headline · Respond to the following:

Human Resource Management Assignment #6

The new benefit you propose must be something new and innovative. (The benefit should not be something already commonly offered as a benefit , e.g.: medical, dental, tuition reimbursement, etc.) Imagine that you are delivering this presentation to c-suite executives that are the decision-makers on the matter. Your objective is

Nov 4 Post about Long-term executive incentive

Please see attached.  List and describe five Long -Term Executive Incentives – Refer to Chapter 14 Compensation Of Special Groups The first part of Chapter 14 identifies and describes the unique characteristics that apply to special groups: · Supervisors · Corporate directors · Executives · Scientists and engineers (professionals) ·

benchmark 3

I have added benchmark 1 for your review.  There is no benchmark 2, so proceed with #3 Benchmark #3: Literature Review and Methodology  · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 150   · Submitting a file upload For Benchmark #3, please include the  most current, updated drafts of the following: 1. Your methodology section if

ogl 570 wk 2

OGL 570 Instructions In each module, you will have the opportunity to participate in an online discussion forum.  This week, you have a  choice of which prompt to respond to. Hot Tip:   It might be helpful to copy-paste the discussion prompts into an offline document (Word, for example), compose your responses

Module 3 Case

Module 3 – Case Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships Assignment Overview Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Reinforced Level In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be assessed at the “reinforced” level. The Quantitative Reasoning rubric will be useful for this purpose. In MGT511, quantitative reasoning skills were assessed at

module 3 SLP

Module 3 – SLP Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships 360-Degree Appraisal The 360-degree appraisal approach entails collecting performance information from several workers who interact with the employee being evaluated. For example, information can be collected from supervisors, subordinates, customers, and peers. In some situations, employees also evaluate their own

Module 2 ogl 551

Module 1: Learning Materials IMPORTANT NOTE :   Anything in the  “Learning Materials” content area  (excluding “Supplemental Learning Materials”)  is “fair game” for the quizzes(as is any other content presented in the module).  You’ll also be doing some analysis and synthesis types of writing in this graduate-level course, so be sure to read

Discussion 3

Discussion 3 A common form of training is cooperative training. There are two widely used cooperative training methods: internships and apprentice training. In both forms of training, there is a combination of classroom training (formal education) and on-the-job training (experience) that can be used for career development. Based on your

Human Resources

Job Interview.  [ NAME OF THE COMPANY ] JOB TITLE: [ ] FSLA EXEMPTION STATUS: [Exempt or Non-Exempt] JOB LOCATION: [City, State] WORK SCHEDULE: [Days, Time] OVERVIEW OF WORK: [Purpose of the position and general summary of the job] TASKS: [5-8 Statements of Tasks · · · · · ·

human resources

The Social Security Benefits Act, which created the Social Security program in the United States, was signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1935 as part of the New Deal. At its core, the program provides financial support to Americans during retirement, in cases of disability, or after

Performance Appriasal

Ethical Performance Appraisal Issues Performance Appraisal  The type of performance appraisal in the workplace. Please see attached