Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

help

Week 1 Assignment – Identifying a Research Topic

Overview

The purpose of the Week 1 assignment is to identify possible topics for your research topic and develop and a problem statement and possible research question(s).

Week 1 targets the following Course Learning Objectives

· CLO1: Examine a variety of topics relevant to teaching and learning and reach consensus with colleagues and/or mentor on a problem to be research

· CLO5: Develop a coherent research plan that support instructional planning through data-driven decision-making

Week 1 Learning Outcomes

Students will:

· W1LO1: Collaboratively review campus cultural and/or instructional concerns/issues and choose on for an area of study.

· W1LO2: Describe the purpose of the study.

· W2LO3: Take the weekly quizzes demonstrating your knowledge of the information from the assigned readings.

Part 1: Week 1 Assignment Part 1: Identifying a Research Topic

Directions:

1. Meet with a colleague to identify 2 to 3 areas of concern that are pertinent to the field of research.

2. In a 1-2 paragraph summary, describe the research that you would like to conduct (although you will not actually be conducting this research in this course), including, the evidence used to identify need, what resources are available to address the needs, and what is a reasonable timeline to address the needs. Be sure to include who your sample would be and how you would access this population.

Part 2: Week 1 Assignment Part 2: Problem Statement and Research Question(s)

Directions:

Based on your meeting with your colleague and the readings from the textbook, identify your problem to research. Then, the next step is to “convert” it into a problem statement. The problem statement is a reiteration of the research problem as a complete sentence. The purpose of the problem statement is to guide your study. Refer to the examples in the text. The research statement is the fundamental question inherent in the research topic. It serves as the main guide to the study. The research questions should begin with the word
how or what. Do not assume results in the questions. Ask questions that can be answered with data. Write a problem statement followed by your research question(s).

Rubric

Use the following Rubric to guide your work on the Week 1 Assignment.

PEDG 5307

Week 2

Tasks

Does Not Meet Minimum Criteria

Approaches Minimum Criteria

Meets Criteria

Exceeds Criteria

Part 1
Identifying Research Topic
(15 points)

The candidate failed to submit a reflective summary regarding identifying a research topic.

(0 points)

The candidate presents a superficial and incomplete summary.

AND/OR

The submission is 1-2 unfocused, rambling and/or poorly organized paragraphs.

AND/OR

The submission contains serious grammar and spelling errors.

(10 points)

The candidate submits a detailed summary identifying 2-3 areas of concern.

AND/OR

The submission is 1-2 paragraphs with clear presentation of ideas but lacks organization.

AND/OR

The submission contains occasional grammar or spelling errors.

(15 points)

The candidate submits a balanced, insightful and thorough summary identifying 2-3 areas of concern.

AND

The submission is 1-2 well developed paragraphs; demonstrate clarity, conciseness, and correctness; and free of grammar and spelling errors.

(20 points)

Part 2a

Problem Statement

(15 points)

Candidate failed to submit a possible problem statement.

(0 points)

The problem statement is unclear and does not include descriptor variables.

(10 p
oints)

The problem statement includes most of the descriptor variables and informs the reader of the exact purpose of the study.

(15 points)

The problem statement is concise, includes descriptor variables and informs the reader of the exact purpose of the study.

(
25 points)

Part 2b

Research Question(s)

(20points

Candidate failed to submit possible research question(s).

Research question is not related to the topic.

(0 points)

Research question(s) demonstrates minimal knowledge or depth of the topic.

Question(s) relates to the topic but is overly broad or narrow.

Topic cannot be realistically researched with available resources and/or time.

Research question(s) is posed as a yes/no question.

(10
points)

Research question(s) is fairly focused and demonstrates good grasp of topic’s depth and complexity.

Question(s) shows

some understanding of issues and concepts related to the subject.

Displays some aspects of original thought or investigation.

(15
points)

Research question(s) demonstrate a deep understanding of the topic and shows analytical thought.

Question is well developed with a scope appropriate to available resources.

Displays a high level of independent thought and inquiry.

(25
points)

PEDG 5307 Fall 2021

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

AQR&A Discussion Week 4

This week’s readings discuss conditional probabilities, conditional odds, logits, odds ratios, relative risk, and slopes. These can all be confusing terms but the good news is that all these values have some relationship to each other. Researchers have their own opinions on which values makes the most sense to report. 

AQR&A Assignment Week 4

To prepare for this Assignment: Review the datasets provided. Construct a research question based on one of those datasets. Use one independent variable and one dependent variable to conduct your simple logistic regression analysis. Remember that your dependent variable must be dichotomous/binary. Think about how you might use the odds

Work Psychology -Leadership, Engagement and Motivation

Case study with at least 25-30 references 7 3. ASSESSMENT Assessment Briefing – 2024/25 Module Code and Module Name MPSY4181 Leadership, Engagement and Motivation Assessment Type and Weighting Case Study Deadline or Assessment Period 20th March, 2025 Word Limit 3,000 words Assessment Description Waltham’s is a leading retailer specialising in

feed back lien

  Nice work presenting the four scales of measurement. Why is it that despite ratio scale being at the highest level of information, is not commonly achieved in research? According to Kline et al. (2005), research aims for interval scale but achieves ordinal level. If I am interested in measuring

Discussion Board

 There are both supporters of and critics of managed care, and the research has been mixed. Discuss at least two pros and cons of managed care. 

discussion board

 Contact a child welfare social worker and interview them about their experiences in their field of practice.  Include these areas in your interview: cultural factors in assessment; legal and policy implications and challenges in practice; and ethical considerations in practice.  Your initial posting should summarize the key points from your

6070-4d

  Post a potential solution to the ethical scenario that draws on ethical leadership and the NASW Code of Ethics. Provide justification for your choices using a specific NASW ethical standard. Additionally, explain the type of power you would utilize in achieving the solution.  (scenario) You have been told that the

Detailed

See attachment Assignment Questions: “What do individuals need to do to be prepared economically for their older years?” · Identify the age that you are starting from and how long this individual will be able to plan for retirement, etc. · Be specific in your responses. Utilize information available on-line,

psych 421

Chapter 5 – Artificially Modeling the mind (200 words) Hello; for this week, please, read chapter 5 and answer the following questions: 1. How do artificial neural network models work alongside neuroscientific techniques to help us study the brain? What do they add to our understanding? 2. Why do you think

feed back prof

 his is a good start but there are some areas that need more detail. I’m going to focus on self-esteem. You mention how others define self-esteem but I’d like you to discuss difficulties in defining self-esteem. Also, how would you define self-esteem after looking at Rosenberg’s scale and others? Do

Discussion

· Discussion 1 · · · Should Russ Saffold intervene to help his team handle this crisis? If so, what type of leadership action should he take, and why? · What leadership actions, if any, should team members take? · What should Russ Saffold do, if anything, to mitigate the

Psychology Can someone help me with my critical thinking homework?

Open Quick Links Quick Links Page Landmarks Content Outline Keyboard Shortcuts Current Location SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Course Content Week 9 – Conflict Resolution Menu Management Options Course Menu: SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Getting Started Home Start Here Course Information My Course Annoucements Course Content My Grades Email Collaborate Technical

Psychology Can someone help me with my critical thinking homework?

Open Quick Links Quick Links Page Landmarks Content Outline Keyboard Shortcuts Current Location SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Course Content Week 9 – Conflict Resolution Menu Management Options Course Menu: SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Getting Started Home Start Here Course Information My Course Annoucements Course Content My Grades Email Collaborate Technical

world cultures

see attachment  Introduction After the death of Alexander in 323 B.C.E, his empire was divided among his generals. For the next few hundred years the Greek culture settled in the customs of the people it had invaded through Alexander. However, while this was happening the Roman people were starting to

world cultures

see attachment  I nstructions: 1. Look up the consequences of Julius Caesar’s assassination. 2. Come up with a scenario in which Caesar wouldn’t have been assassinated. 3. Think three possibilities of your own and explain why you think those. 4. Submit your assignment in Word and in the space provided

english

see attachment  CRAAP Test: Is Your Source Worthy of Inclusion in Your Essay Research? If you want to succeed at your assignments or research, you should only use quality information. Use the following criteria, also known as the  CRAAP Test, to evaluate any information source critically. Video: Evaluating SourcesLinks to

english

see attachment  CRAAP Test: Is Your Source Worthy of Inclusion in Your Essay Research? If you want to succeed at your assignments or research, you should only use quality information. Use the following criteria, also known as the  CRAAP Test, to evaluate any information source critically. Video: Evaluating SourcesLinks to

english

see attachment  Discussion Etiquette Guidelines: 1. Think and edit before you post. 2. DON’T SHOUT: TYPING IN ALL CAPS IS AGGRESSIVE.  3. Participate, but don’t dominate. 4. Cite your sources. · Imagine sending as a text message one of these guidelines to the main character in a movie who reacted