Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Evidence-Based Practice

  

IDENTIFY A GAP IN PRACTICE

IDENTIFY A GAP IN PRACTICE

During the first 2 weeks of the course, you identified a problem in your organization. In your Discussion, you examined this problem with your colleagues. Now, it is time to present this identified gap in practice to your Instructor.

Recall we have already identified the GAP in my practice.

Inconsistent physical monitoring, lack of standardization, inadequate documentation, and minimal interdisciplinary collaboration were the main practice gaps that were identified in my organization.

 

 

 

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES


Required Readings

· Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). 
Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

· Chapter 4, “The Practice Question Phase” (pp. 73–98)

· Hickey, J. V., & Giardino, E. R. (Eds.). (2021). 
Evaluation of quality in health care for DNPs (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.

· Chapter 1, “Evaluation and Advanced Nursing Practice: The Mandate for Evaluation” (pp. 3–36)

· Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2017). 


Action plan for translating research into practice: Gap analysis and tests of change: Facilitator guide

Links to an external site.
.

· Chia, R., Pandey, A., & Vongpatanasin, W. (2020). 

Resistant hypertension—defining the scope of the problemLinks to an external site.

Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
63(1), 46–50.

· Gallagher Ford, L., & Melnyk, B. M. (2019). 

The underappreciated and misunderstood PICOT question: A critical step in the EBP processLinks to an external site.

Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(6), 422–423.

· Shirey, M. R. (2011). 

Addressing strategy execution challenges to lead sustainable changeLinks to an external site.

JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration
41(1), 1–4.

· Stannard, D. (2021). 

Problem identification: The first step in evidence‐based practiceLinks to an external site.

AORN Journal
113(4), 377–378.

· Walden University Oasis: Writing Center. (n.d.). 


Citations: OverviewLinks to an external site.


. 

· Walden University Oasis: Writing Center. (n.d.). 


Common assignments: Discussion post

Links to an external site.
.

TO PREPARE

· Review the Learning Resources covering problem identification.

· Identify a gap in practice or needed practice change at your practicum.

· Work with your preceptor to explore the gap in practice or practice change for you to lead. 

THE ASSIGNMENT: (1–2 PAGES)

Working with your preceptor, identify a gap in practice or a practice change that you can help address by leading multiple activities in the organization toward the change throughout the duration of your practicum experience. 

During the clinical hours required in this practicum course, you may pursue activities within this course that support your DNP project, such as meeting with the team and stakeholders to improve problem identification and/or conducting discussions with the team about literature search and critique. 

Remember, the DNP project site and the project mentor may or may not be the same site or preceptor where the student completes this practicum course, so all DNP students should remember to communicate with the DNP Faculty mentor about any activities that may contribute to the DNP project. 

Faculty will need to approve of the identified gap in practice or practice change prior to moving forward with the activities.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at 

to an external site.
). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Rubric

NURS_8502_Week2_Assignment3_Rubric

NURS_8502_Week2_Assignment3_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify and describe the gap in practice or practice change you will address in the organization throughout the duration of the practicum.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly describes in detail a gap in practice or practice change to be addressed throughout the duration of the practicum.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes a gap in practice or practice change to be addressed throughout the duration of the practicum.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes a gap in practice or practice change…. OR … The response omits either the identification or description of a gap in practice or practice change. OR … The response describes a gap in practice or practice change that cannot be addressed throughout the duration of the practicum

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes a gap in practice or practice change, or it is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the activities you will lead in order to support the gap in practice or practice change.

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail which lead activities will support the gap in practice or practice change.

35 to >31.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains which lead activities will support the gap in practice or practice change.

31 to >27.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains which lead activities will support the gap in practice or practice change.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains which lead activities will support the gap in practice or practice change, or it is missing.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

State & Federal Advocacy

What advocacy actions might you take to improve health care through legislation at the state or federal level?

Nurses Map

NIGHTINGALE COLLEGE DIRECT-FOCUSED CARE: CONCEPT MAPPING ASSIGNMENT WORKSHEET Name: Click or tap here to enter text. Course: Click or tap here to enter text. Client Information (SBAR) Concept of the Map Situation Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Background Click or tap

Environmental and Occupational Health Sept 16

Assignment Submit your environmental health “Paper Topic” in this discussion board. Argue the significance of this issue in improving the health of the public. Each topic should be supported by two peer-reviewed articles (300 words; APA citations required). This maps to LO1, LO3, LO6, LO8

NUR 620

1. Reply from Daniela Barbeito Depression Case Summary of the Clinical Case Ms. Z is a 28-year-old assistant store manager who appears sad after she had a breakup one month ago. On the subjective, she complains that she has low mood, oversleeping, fatigue despite long sleep duration, lack of concentration

NUR 504 Module 4 Discussion

Module 4 Discussion   The Homeless Patient Evaluation & Management Plan The nurse practitioner (NP) is working at a health clinic in a homeless shelter during the early evening. A 48-year-old African American man approaches the practitioner and asks to have his blood pressure taken, saying that he has not

Clinical module 4 discussion

Module 4 Discussion   Weekly Clinical Experience 4 Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? (identifying the needed studies needed for the patients’ symptoms) · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S),

Interprofessional Education

see attachment The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate how interprofessional education has evolved within the health care environment to support a more team-based approach to patient-centered health care. In a paper of 500-750 words, address the following points: 1. Define interprofessional education, explain how it was developed, and discuss the goals

Children and Families Clinicals Discussion 4

Weekly Clinical Experience 4 Describe your clinical experience for this week with a 10-month-old male with conjunctivitis · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least

Children and Family Discussion 4

Approaches to Disease Management: Dermatologic Disorder Discuss Impetigo in pediatrics, a dermatologic disorder, and its treatment modalities. Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

see attachment

MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK. 4-6 pages long. APA format. 3-5 scholarly resources from the last 5 years. On topic below.  Teaching Plan Paper (30 points) APA Paper  • Target Population: Adolescent boy ages 13-17 pertaining to mental health, 14 participants  o Who is your target audience? – include age of

NUR 620

 Patient Care After studying Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following: The unlawful restraint of a patient can be a legal pitfall for the PMHNP.  K.W. was found eating hamburgers out of a Mcdonald’s dumpster and drinking water from an old water hose.  She had not taken a bath

HW

Professional Goal and Objectives: (SMART) · Professional goals and objectives are related to this course’s clinical rotation (practicum).  · Please note that the SMART goals and objectives you submit must be professional in nature. · During your clinical practicum, you will have the opportunity to work side-by-side with an expert (RN

Discussion

Module 5 Assignment PICOT Question Assignment effective strategies to decrease pediatric obesity in primary care settings.  This is certainly an area/challenge that FNPs are constantly faced with in primary care and particularly with some specific cultures or ethnic groups

Week 3 discu

General Instructions: Conflict is common in healthcare settings. Common team sources of conflict include hierarchical relationships, authority differentials, poor communication, negative or disruptive behaviors, and multigenerational interprofessional teams.    Include the following sections:  Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.  Describe a conflict you have encountered in your nursing

NUR509W4

DISCUSSION: The nurse practitioner (NP) is working at a health clinic in a homeless shelter during the early evening. A 48-year-old African American man approaches the practitioner and asks to have his blood pressure taken, saying that he has not had it checked “in a while”. The man appears to

NUR509CL 4

DISCUSSION: Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales. (CASE: R shoulder

nurse sam

Anemia Classification Instructions: For each of the scenarios below, identify the following: 1. Type of anemia a. Folate Deficiency b. Anemia of Inflammation c. Iron Deficiency Anemia d. Vitamin B12 Deficiency e. Thalassemia 2. Classification of anemia a. Microcytic-hypochromic b. Macrocytic-normochromic c. Normocytic-normochromic 3. After identifying the type and class,

nursing

To Prepare: Review resources about contextual factors. Consider how contextual factors will impact your advocacy priority.  By Day 3 of Week 4 Post a response detailing the following:  Which contextual factors will promote getting your advocacy priority on the agenda?  Which contextual factors might work against it?