Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Evidence-Based Practice

  

DEFINING AND REFINING THE PROBLEM

DEFINING AND REFINING THE PROBLEM

You have now spent 3 full weeks working on an identified practice problem. You have spent time with your team and preceptor at your practicum site, and you have begun to evaluate the scope of the problem and need for change. Based on your experiences in these first 4 weeks, what is working? What is not working? What has or has not worked in the past?

For this Discussion, you will consider your identified practice problem to help define and refine the work that you have done thus far. Consider what is working, what is not working, your stakeholders, and what has worked and has not worked in the past. Review the evidence gathered to determine how you might need to refine your identified practice problem. 

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES


Required Readings

· Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). 
Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

· Chapter 5, “Searching for Evidence” (pp. 99–120) 

· Hickey, J. V., & Giardino, E. R. (Eds.). (2021). 
Evaluation of quality in health care for DNPs (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.

· Chapter 2, “The Nature of Evidence as a Basis for Evaluation” (pp. 37–64)

· Chapter 3, “Models for Evaluation in Advanced Nursing Practice” (pp. 65–92)

· Benson, L. A. (2021). 

Chapter 14: The DNP degree: A fundamental requirement for the chief nursing offer.
 
The DNP professional: Translating value from classroom to practice. Slack.

· Benson, L. A. (2021). 

Chapter 15: Leaders, change agents: The unique contributions of a DNP-prepared nurse executive.
 
The DNP professional: Translating value from classroom to practice. Slack. 

· Benson, L. A. (2021). 

Chapter 16: Aligning DNP practice with the mission and strategic priority of the organization.
 
The DNP professional: Translating value from classroom to practice. Slack. 

· Foster, M., Shurtz, S., & Smith, M. L. (2014). 

Translating research into practice: Criteria for applying literature search results to your workLinks to an external site.

Health Promotion Practice
15(2), 157–160.

· Haas, M., & Mortensen, M. (2016). 

The secrets of great teamwork.Links to an external site.
 
Harvard Business Review, 
94(6), 70–76.

· Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. H., & Ali, M. (2018). 

Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational changeLinks to an external site.

Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
3(3), 123–127.

· Jones, E. P., Brennan, E. A., & Davis, A. (2020). 

Evaluation of literature searching and article selection skills of an evidence-based practice teamLinks to an external site.

Journal of the Medical Library Association
108(3), 487–493.

· Merner, B., Lowe, D., Walsh, L., Synnot, A., Stratil, J., Lewin, S., Glenton, C., von Philipsborn, P., Schonfeld, L., Ryan, R., O’Connor, D., Hoving, J. L., & Hill, S. (2021). 


American Journal of Public Health

Links to an external site.

111(7), 1210–1215.

· Smith, L. W. (2000). 


Stakeholder analysis: A pivotal practice of successful projectsLinks to an external site.


TO PREPARE

· Review the Learning Resources that address problem identification.

· Analyze the work done thus far on your identified practice problem, specifically analyzing what management has done to date with the problem.

· Review your practice focused question, meetings with your team and preceptor, and your identification of stakeholders.

Post a response discussing your selected practice problem. After meeting with your team, describe the following:

· What is currently working? 

· What has not worked?

· What changes might you implement?

· What changes might you consider in addressing the problem?

· Are these changes supported by evidence?

In your response, share what you have been working on throughout the first 4 weeks of the course, focusing specifically on defining your practice focused question, meeting with your team, and identifying stakeholders. Be specific. What leadership strategies might you use to support the problem you have identified? Explain whether you have refined your practice focused question and why.

ssignment Rubric Details

Close

Rubric

NURS_8502_Week4_Blog_Rubric

NURS_8502_Week4_Blog_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content

60 to >49.0 pts

Excellent

• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

49 to >38.0 pts

Good

• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

38 to >27.0 pts

Fair

• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Does not post main blog by due date.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague’s main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

Total Points: 100

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

module 10 reflections

follow all directions HCM 700 Module Ten Journal Guidelines and Rubric Overview The journal ac�vi�es in this course are private between you and your instructor. Journal ac�vi�es are designed to help you make meaningful connec�ons between the course content and the course larger goals. Prompt This journal will encourage you

rua

Your paper must follow APA guidelines Title slide: please include title of RUA, your name, name of school, number and name of course, instructor name, due date or session. All information should be on its own line and centered.-FOLLOW APA GUIDELINES! Please delete the highlighted areas when submitting, this is

topic

Please read thoroughly as price is non-negotiable. 2 2 Your Title Here Your Name (without credentials) Chamberlain University College of Nursing Course Number: Course Name Name of Instructor Assignment Due Date Title of Your Paper in Upper and Lower Case Clinical Question Levels of Evidence Search Strategy Relevant Articles Conclusion

Nursing nus 601 M5 assignment

  Guide for a Selected Chronic Condition The purpose of this assignment is to design a study guide that will assist you and your peers to translate relevant clinical guidelines and evidence-based research into evidence-based practice to promote health and prevent chronic health problems. The conditions below: · Congestive Heart

Nursing Planning for “Pamphlet Presentation & Peer Review” Assignment

 Assignment: Pamphlet Presentation and Peer Review Assignment.  In preparation for your module seven assignment, choose a cultural group that you believe is essential for your colleagues to understand in your healthcare setting. Consider the diversity of patients you may encounter. Begin conducting thorough research on the chosen cultural group.  Compile

Question03

Given that BMI is approximately normally distributed, present the following summary statistics for BMI of smokers and nonsmokers (Hint: Think about ST3001.).   Smokers Nonsmokers Mean     Standard deviation     Use this table to answer the following questions based on your individual data. For each response, write a

Nursing Nursing, Help with homework

 need help to see if this is done correctly.  The Role of the School Nurse and the Coronavirus Pandemic Purpose: To provide the student with an overview of the essential role the nurse plays in the community as a school nurse with a focus on the present pandemic. Learning Objectives

ST02

Professor notes: Show the calculation for r^2.  How do you manually calculate it? What is each of the six measures correlated with? You have to read the article.  Please check page 583 in the text for the wording on r-squared, the Coefficient of Determination. It is in bold print there.

Week 4 Reflection NR505NP

  Reflection: write 1-2 paragraphs reflecting on your learning for the week. Guiding questions are provided or you may write about what you felt was most significant to you for the week. How hard was it to find a qualitative article related to your area of interest? Did you have

Week 3 collaboration Cafe NR505NP HB Response 1

 reply to below CBT and medication in depression (Review) – PMC (nih.gov)Links to an external site. Article Summary To show that depression is a serious problem, primarily for the patient. The WHO has increased the number of cases in a 10 year case study for 18.4%. Purpose: This article investigates

case study Allen

 Allen is a 70-year-old with a medical history of hypertension and GERD  APA FORMAT, AND REFERENCES, peer review scholarly resource cited in APA format from 2019-2024 only. (Within the last 5 years) Please do not solely use a website as your scholarly reference. It is fine to use it as

Leadership Interview

Instructions are on file Nursing Management NURS 4412 Leader Interview PURPOSE Interview a current nursing leader in the healthcare organization where you complete your precepted clinical experience. You can ask any of your preceptors these interview questions and keep for reference or comparison when you do your formal leader interview.

Ch 12

Instructions: 1. Obtain a copy of your hospital’s organizational chart. Above is the University of Miami’s Organizational Chart. Most of them can be found online, or you can ask your administrative office for a copy. If you are not working right now, then look up the map of a local

Ch 14

Instructions: 1. Complete the  Staffing Table. 2. Type your answers in the  Staffing Table, save the file, and then upload the file.

FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE 4

   Nurse leaders must be able to make effective financial and policy decisions. Equally important is the ability to communicate their vision for change to policymakers and provide objective, evidence-based support for their position with respect to the regulatory, political, social, ethical, legal, and financial aspects of systemic change.

Management Plan/ Soap Note

Management Plan 2 yo African American female who presents with a rash. The rash started this morning on abdomen and has now spread to arms and legs. No itching or pain per mom. Mom reports she has not tried anything for the rash. She had fever of 103, nonproductive cough,

FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE 3

   To improve health care outcomes within a community, leaders must understand the needs of specific populations. In addition, it is important that leaders are able to gather and present persuasive evidence to decision makers to obtain the necessary funding and establish these needs as priorities for budget and resource

Graphic

Choose one article from the list below: Kelley, E. S., & Bueno, R. (2022).  Explicit word learning in preschoolers from families with high or low maternal education.  Communication Disorders Quarterly, 43(4), 246–260. Leighton, K., Kardong-Edgren, S., Schneidereith, T., Foisy-Doll, C., & Wuestney, K. A. (2021).  Meeting undergraduate nursing students’ clinical