Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Power point

 Business Brief Presentation

Business Brief Presentation 1 based on Chapter 14 (Gender and Leadership)

business briefings on leadership topics drawn from Northouse’s Interactive Book on Leadership. This presentation is based on either one of the week’s assigned reading chapters. has one slide per person outlining your take on the theory of leadership (with the additional cover slide and reference slides. The slides should: 1) summarize the theory. 2) explain how it adds to leadership studies 3) discuss criticisms of the theory, 4) present some new material on the theory (last five years {the more recent the better}), and 5) provide your group’s assessment of the approach with respect to today’s workforce and current global environment (e.g. is it useful, practical, easy, dated). 

The briefing will be assessed using the Rubric criteria on each dimension:

Accuracy – did you make an accurate summary of the theory and its critics

Presentation Quality – were the slides professional (font, size, color choices etc)

Value – did the new material extend the textbook material in a relevant and interesting way

Credibility – was the group’s assessment credible

Text book

Northouse, P.G. (2022) Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th edition), Sage Leadership
Theory and Practice (You must have the 9th edition for this class, older editions will not
work)
By: Peter G. Northouse
Publisher: SAGE Publications, Inc
Print ISBN: 9781544397566, 1544397569
e-text ISBN: 9781071834473, 1071834479

Rubric

Business Briefing 22

Business Briefing 22

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy

Summary of theory and critics

19 pts

Superior 90-100 pts.

Thoroughly accurate summary of the theory and its critics. [19 to 17.1 points]

17 pts

Excellent 80-89 pts.

Mostly accurate summary of the theory and its critics. [15.2 to 17 points]

15.1 pts

Good 70-79 pts.

Somewhat accurate summary of the theory and its critics. [13.2 to 15.1 points]

13.1 pts

Fair 60-69 pts

Not very accurate summary of the theory and/or its critics. [11.4 to 13.1 points]

11.3 pts

Poor 0-59 pts.

Missing the summary of the theory and/or its critics. [0 to 11.3 points]

19 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeam

Professional presentation by group members

19 pts

Superior 90-100 pts.

All of the group members presented for at least one minute in a professional manner and no individual presented for more than two minutes. [19 to 17.1 points]

17 pts

Excellent 80-89 pts.

Not all of the group members presented for at least one minute in a professional manner, and no individuals presented for more than two minutes. [15.2 to 17 points]

15.1 pts

Good 70-79 pts.

All of the group members presented for at least one minute in a somewhat professional manner and no individual presented for more than two minutes. [13.2 to 15.1 points]

13.1 pts

Fair 60-69 pts

Not all of the group members presented for at least one minute in a professional manner, and one or more individuals presented for more than two minutes. [11.4 to 13.1 points]

11.3 pts

Poor 0-59 pts.

Not all of the group members presented for at least one minute and the presentation was not done in a professional manner. [0 to 11.3 points]

19 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Quality

Professional looking slide deck

19 pts

Superior 90-100 pts.

The slides were very professional in terms of (font, size, color choices etc). [19 to 17.1 points]

17 pts

Excellent 80-89 pts.

The slides were professional in terms of (font, size, color choices etc). [15.2 to 17 points]

15.1 pts

Good 70-79 pts.

The slides were somewhat professional in terms of (font, size, color choices etc), but they could have been more engaging to the audience. [13.2 to 15.1 points]

13.1 pts

Fair 60-69 pts

The slides were not professional in terms of (font, size, color choices etc), and/or they could have been more engaging to the audience. [11.4 to 13.1 points]

11.3 pts

Poor 0-59 pts.

The slides were not professional in terms of (font, size, color choices etc) and they were not engaging to the audience. [0 to 11.3 points]

19 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValue

Extending the conversation beyond the textbook

19 pts

Superior 90-100 pts.

The new material (research) extended the textbook material in a relevant and interesting way. [19 to 17.1 points]

17 pts

Excellent 80-89 pts.

The new material (research) somewhat extended the textbook material in a relevant and interesting way. [15.2 to 17 points]

15.1 pts

Good 70-79 pts.

The new material (research) barely extended the textbook material in a relevant and interesting way. [13.2 to 15.1 points]

13.1 pts

Fair 60-69 pts

The new material (research) barely extended the textbook material and it was not relevant and/or interesting. [11.4 to 13.1 points]

11.3 pts

Poor 0-59 pts.

The new material (research) did not extended the textbook material. [0 to 11.3 points]

19 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCredibility

Reliability of the group’s assessment

19 pts

Superior 90-100 pts.

The group’s assessment was highly credible. [19 to 17.1 points]

17 pts

Excellent 80-89 pts.

The group’s assessment was somewhat credible. [15.2 to 17 points]

15.1 pts

Good 70-79 pts.

The group’s assessment was basically credible. [13.2 to 15.1 points]

13.1 pts

Fair 60-69 pts

The group’s assessment was not very credible. [11.4 to 13.1 points]

11.3 pts

Poor 0-59 pts.

The group’s assessment was not credible. [0 to 11.3 points]

19 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

Adhere to APA guidelines for citations and references
5%

5 pts

Superior 90-100 pts.

Properly formatted APA style citations and references with 0 errors. [4.5 to 5 points]

4.4 pts

Excellent 80-89 pts.

Properly formatted APA style citations and references with 1 error. [4 to 4.4 points]

3.9 pts

Good 70-79 pts.

Properly formatted APA style citations and references with 2 errors. [3.5 to 3.9 points]

3.4 pts

Fair 60-69 pts

Properly formatted APA style citations and references with 3 errors. [3 to 3.4 points]

2.9 pts

Poor 0-59 pts.

Properly formatted APA style citations and references with more than 3 errors. [0 to 2.9 points]

5 pts

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Prof Double R

DISCUSSION 1 In a conversation with a family member, you are told: “Bad people do bad things. Some people are just bad eggs.” For this discussion, you will incorporate what you have learned about antisocial behavior and its implications for promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion. For your initial post, review

Case Study

answering the case by applying all the digital transformation tools  Chapter 1: The Five Domains of Digital Transformation: Customers, Competition, Data, Innovation, Value This chapter introduces the five domains of digital transformation: customers, competition, data, innovation, and value. It explains how digital technologies are changing strategic assumptions in each domain,

Group project

Background UNLO Kuwait Group Company is currently exploring new business opportunities by identifying and targeting untapped market segments. As part of this initiative, students will engage in a strategic consulting assignment focused on discovering feasible and sustainable market expansion options for the company. Student teams will work on real-world business

Business Finance – Management 2-2 Assignment: Communications Plan Template

  MGT 550 Module Two Assignment Guidelines and Rubric Overview Using the Communications Template, linked in the What to Submit section, identify two overall issues that are present in the final project case study that can be addressed using internal and external communications. For each issue, note the red flags

Calculate the economic value added assuming its cost of capital

At the end of 2011 Home Depot’s total capitalization amounted to $29,031 million. In 2012 debt investors received interest income of $648 million. Net income to shareholders was $4,487 million. (Assume a tax rate of 35%.) Calculate the economic value added assuming its cost of capital is 10%. (Do not

Econ 13

Instructions attached Please answer the following questions 1. Please research ‘forced arbitration” and tell us what you find out about it. What is it and do you think it is a good or a bad thing? Explain. To what extent is forced arbitration legal in California and federally. 2. How

leasing

   Lewis Securities Inc. has decided to acquire a new market data and quotation system for its Richmond home office. The system receives current market prices and other information from several online data services and then either displays the information on a screen or stores it for later retrieval by

HRM 6303 VII SA

2 Training and Development HRM 6303 Unit VII SA For this assignment, you will write a report that details the components of an executive leadership development program for a fictitious company. The fictitious company can be within an organization and industry of your choice. Do not use the name of

ACC 5301 VI

2 Management Applications of Accounting ACC 5301 Unit VI Assignment This assignment measures your mastery of ULOs 2.5, 4.1, 5.2, and 6.1. You have been hired at ABC Manufacturing, and you have been asked to work on the budget for the upcoming year regarding labor costs and the number of

Lead 4

Week 4: The KPI Dashboard The KPI Dashboard Review the following video. Transcript attached Instructions After reviewing the Week 4 Reading and Supplemental Materials, create a 2-page Microsoft Word Memo and infographic (instead of a traditional dashboard) for an organization you have been or still are affiliated with.  You do not have

MIS -4

Week 4: Project Paper #2: Jobs to be Done and Value Proposition Hypothesis Introduction You will use the Jobs to Be Done (JTBD) framework to reframe the problem from the customer’s perspective, then define the key value your product or service must deliver to solve it. This is your opportunity

Response

see attached  Informative Presentation Assessment After the final presentations are complete, write a brief (250-word minimum) reflection essay on how things went for you that includes the following: 1. Describe your own process as you prepared to give your presentation. How did you settle on the topic that you chose?

Firm

   Paul Duncan, financial manager of EduSoft Inc., is facing a dilemma. The firm was founded 5 years ago to provide educational software for the rapidly expanding primary and secondary school markets. Although EduSoft has done well, the firm’s founder believes an industry shakeout is imminent. To survive, EduSoft must

Excel spreadsheet

Need this project completed Sheet1 Key Check Figures Schedules Schedule B July August September Sched E15 Total collections $2,274,993 $2,572,479 $2,858,704 $929,200 Schedule D COGS $1,692,384 $1,909,842 $2,156,968 Schedule E Total Payments $2,076,010 $1,985,264 $2,177,350 Projected Income statements Net Income before Taxes $125,877 $161,323 $203,086 Projected Balance Seet September Accounts

Business

PSYC 320 Behavior Modification Project: Treatment Phase Report Assignment Instructions Overview The treatment phase is like the baseline phase with the exception of the treatment being added to determine if there is a change in the data. Treat your target behavior, using the treatment method(s) that you have researched in

HUM 102 Module Five Project Draft

SEE ATTACHMENT Module Five Project Draft Guidelines and Rubric.html HUM 102 Module Five Project Draft Guidelines and Rubric Overview At this stage, you have learned how creative works are components of the humanities, how diverse perspectives add value to works, how bias and assumptions can influence how you view creative

int 6

topic:   World Financial Markets and Institutions BUSI 606 Discussion Assignment Instructions The Discussions allow you the opportunity to apply what you have learned from the Module: Week’s readings. There are 2 parts to each Discussion: thread and replies. Both parts must be posted and written in a substantive manner,