|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain pulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.
|
|
30 to >27.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
|
27 to >24.0 pts
Good
The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
|
24 to >22.0 pts
Fair
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes reasons for the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.
|
22 to >0 pts
Poor
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include reasons for pulmonary pathophysiologic processes, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.
|
|
30 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
|
|
30 to >27.0 pts
Excellent
The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
|
27 to >24.0 pts
Good
The response includes an accurate explanation of how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
|
24 to >22.0 pts
Fair
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how thepulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
|
22 to >0 pts
Poor
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how thepulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
|
|
30 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
|
|
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
|
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response includes an accurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
|
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, and/or explanations based on inappropriate evidence/research.
|
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
|
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
|
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
