Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Human Resource Management human, resource, assignment

I need your help

Name: Enter your name here.

Date: Enter the date here.

Critical Thinking Final Touchstone

In this assignment, you will make two contrasting normative arguments about what one
ought to do. Both arguments will be about the same topic, and so at least one of the arguments is likely to be something you don’t actually agree with. You will compose the arguments in standard form—that is, as a series of statements that end with your conclusion.
Reminder: Do not write as an essay!

Part I. Select your topic and arguments.

Page 1

Critical Thinking – Final Touchstone

a. Choose a topic from the following list:

· Should people eat meat?

· Should marijuana be legal?

· Should pet cats be kept indoors?

· Should zoos exist?

· Should customers leave a tip in a coffee shop?

· Should seat belt wearing be mandatory?

· Should children be required to take gym/PE classes?

· Should public roads be used for private car parking?

b. Write two logically contradictory normative conclusions for the topic. You do not need to agree with both (or either!) conclusions, but you should be able to logically support both of them.

The conclusions need
not be phrased exactly the same as they are phrased in the topic list, but they
do need to be logically contradictory to one another. For example, if you selected the topic “Should people eat meat?”, your conclusions might be:

· People should not eat meat.

· People should eat meat.

But it would also be acceptable to choose:

· People should reduce their meat consumption.

· People need not reduce their meat consumption.

c. These conclusions will be the final line of your argument. If you revise a conclusion after writing the argument, you should revise the conclusion here to match.

Conclusion #1:

Enter your first conclusion here.

Conclusion #2:

Enter your second conclusion here.

Part II. Write your arguments in standard form.

a. Standard form is a series of numbered statements. Each should be one sentence long. The final statement is the conclusion.
You do not need to label statements as premises or conclusions; it is understood by the form of the argument that all statements are premises except the final one, which is always the conclusion.

b. There should be at least one
normative statement (stating what people should do) and at least one descriptive statement (describing something to be true). Statements that predict outcomes or describe what people believe are not normative. A good way to determine if a statement is normative is looking for verb phrases like “should,” “ought,” or “have an obligation to.”

c. If any of your premises make factual statements that are not common knowledge and widely accepted, include a source supporting your reference. This can be an APA citation or just a link to a reputable website or publication.

Here is a helpful resource for APA references.

d. Place an asterisk (*) by the
normative premise(s) that support the conclusion.

e. Do not use your conclusion as a premise. This is the fallacy of “begging the question.”

f. There may be a
subargument within your argument, a conclusion reached by premises that then becomes a conclusion that supports your premise. If there is a subargument, underline the

subconclusion
.

g. The
conclusion should be the final statement in your argument (as given above) and begin with the word “therefore.” These should correspond to the conclusions from Part 1.

h. The complete argument (including conclusion) should be 5-7 statements.

Argument #1

Insert your first argument here.

Argument #2

Insert your second argument here.

Part III. Reflection

1. Are your arguments deductive or inductive? Explain what the difference is between the two and why you see your argument as inductive or deductive. (2 sentences)

Enter answer here.

2. Identify either a deductive rule of inference or an inductive practice that helps support your conclusion. Explain what the rule or practice means and how it was used to reach your conclusion. (2-3 sentences)

Enter answer here.

3. What moral framework do you use to justify your normative conclusions (utilitarian, deontological, or virtue ethics)? Explain the meaning of the moral framework and how adopting that perspective leads to your conclusion. The two arguments do not need to follow the same moral theory. (4-6 sentences)

Enter answer here.

4. What assumptions are you making that may compromise your arguments? Use language from the tutorials that identify cognitive and unconscious biases. This should be about your experience, not a general response about potential biases. (4-6 sentences)

Enter answer here.

5. What opinion did you have when you began this assignment, and what challenges to critical thinking did you encounter when arguing for a conclusion you didn’t agree with? How did logic and critical thinking help you to think about your topic from two different angles? This should be about your personal experience, not a general response about the challenges of considering other points of view. (4-6 sentences)

Enter answer here.

Refer to the checklist below throughout the Touchstone process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Argument Preparation

❒ Is each argument in standard form, not paragraph form?
❒ Do your two arguments have logically contradictory conclusions?
❒ Is each argument at least five declarative sentences, ending in a conclusion?
❒ Does each argument have a normative conclusion (saying what people ought to do)?
❒ Is there at least one normative premise that supports each conclusion?

2. Annotating Your Argument

❒ Did you place an asterisk (*) on the normative premise(s) that support your conclusion?
❒ Did you underline any subconclusions in your argument?
❒ Are there sources for any assertions that are fact-based and not well known/accepted?<

3. Reflection Questions

❒ Did you answer all five of the reflection questions satisfactorily?
❒ Do your answers meet the length requirement and fully answer the question?

image1.png

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

human resource

I need your help © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. JWI 522 (1192) Page 1 of 6 JWI

human resource

I need your help JWI 522: Strategic Partnering with the C-Suite Assignment 1 © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer

module 2 reaction

Read all the required articles on the Learning Materials page, then  CHOOSE ONE OF THE REQUIRED ARTICLES from that page for this assignment. Write up a total of TWO PAGES (no more), single-spaced, in the form of a synopsis and “reaction” to the readings — i.e., dedicate ONLY TWO PAGES of

Discussion 4 MR

Discussion 4 First Post—Module 4 Read the following three articles: Are Incentives a Good Employee Motivator?  (2019).  Forbes. Retrieved from  Corporate Finance Institute. (n.d.).  What is the Fraud Triangle?  Retrieved from Tarallo, M. (2018). Paved with good intentions: How employee incentives can go awry.  HRNews. Available from ProQuest in the Trident Online

Human Resource

I need your help In 2017, I was offered a job to be the staffing coordinator at a previous job in a nursing facility. I declined the job three times, because not only was I afraid of rejection, but I also did not think I was a people person. My

respond to discussion 3MR

Respond to discussion As we see from the video, HMP Finance recommends employers to have generous paid-time-off policies. · If you were in charge of a business, what paid-time-off benefits would you implement to help retain and attract great employees? Why? · What would be the strengths and drawbacks of

CJ 201

Chapter 11 (201) Part A 1. In response to allegations of racial profiling (an abuse of discretion), a number of law enforcement agencies have adopted new policies and procedures to control traffic enforcement activities by their officers. Search the Internet for reports on racial profiling. Try key words “racial profiling” or “driving

Activity 2 ogl 550

You will need to read the following chapter (via the “BryteWave Course Materials” link in the left-hand menu) to complete this assignment: · CHAPTER 4 of Morgan, G. (2006). Learning and Self-Organization: Organizations as Brains. (Chapter 4, pp. 71-114). INSTRUCTIONS IN BRIEF: While reading CHAPTER 4 write up a total of TWO

Case study

Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 3 Points: 100 Overview: This case illustrates several ways in which Southwest Airlines utilizes the four main building blocks of competitive advantage: efficiency, customer responsiveness, innovation, and reliable quality. Instructions: You will need to review the Southwest Airlines case study at the

human resource

I NEED YOUR HELP 60 � June 2018 www.humancapitalonline.com ◆ CHANGE STRATEGY2 constantly change. The growing global competition, and, the rate of technological advancement foresees a continuing need for change. Change helps improve and increase productivity, which ultimately bolsters sales and the overall business of an enterprise. Hence, an organisation

human resource

I need your help This file is too large to display.View in new window

Module 2 550 activity 2

OGL 550 Organizations as Brains Morgan Ch. 4 Organizations as Brains Is it possible to design “learning organizations” that have the capacity to be flexile, resilient, and inventive as the functioning of the brain? Is it possible to distribute capacities for intelligence and control throughout an enterprise so that the

human resource

I need your help © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. JWI 556 (1196) Page 1 of 8 JWI

DB wk 550

Module 1: Discussion Board on Applied Project Ideas Hello Leaders, Please complete this two-part assignment: · For part 1, after reviewing all of  the materials on the MODULE 1 ACTIVITY page, submit an initial post of at least 300 words addressing the points below. · For part 2, respond to 

wk 1 550

Mod 1 Reaction Paper (in 2 sheets)  · Due Monday by 11:59pm   You will need to read the following chapters (via the “BryteWave Course Materials” link in the left-hand menu) to complete this assignment. Then pick one of the assigned chapters for your write-up: · Chapter 2 (pp. 10 — 29) in

Human Resource Management

Managing Virtual and Global Teams This assignment gives you an opportunity to work with a group of peers to synthesize and apply what you have learned this term about effective virtual teams.  Your consulting report should be the original work of your team; the team may not use  papers or any part

Tesla Case Study

Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 2 Points: 100 Overview: In this assignment, you need to review the Tesla, Inc. case study. The case study describes the rise of Tesla Motors, an electric vehicle company founded in 2004 by electric inventor Martin Eberhard and South African innovator, Elon

Human Resources Management

Employee and Labor Relations  The purpose of this assignment is to strengthen your research skills, enhance your presentation skills, and expand your knowledge. You will need to research material beyond the class readings to investigate labor/employee relations at a specific organization. You will report your findings to the class in