Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 2:

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 2: ADVANCED LEVELS OF CLINICAL INQUIRY AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?

In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

 
To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

· Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.

· Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.

· Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

· Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

· Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

· Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

· Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.

· Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 5

Submit Part 2 of your Evidence-Based Project.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
MD3Assgn+last name+first initial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

80 to >71.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the developed PICO(T) question. …The presentation clearly and accurately identifies four or more research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. …The presentation includes specific and relevant examples that fully support the research. …The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and accurate synthesis of two outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected, and fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation.

71 to >63.0 pts

Good

The presentation accurately identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation accurately describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation accurately identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. …The presentation includes relevant examples that support the research presented.

63 to >55.0 pts

Fair

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. …The presentation includes inaccurate or vague examples to support the research presented.

55 to >0 pts

Poor

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest or is missing. …The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question or is missing. …The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies less than four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected or is missing. …The presentation includes inaccurate and vague examples to support the research presented or is missing.

80 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Using proper in-text citations, the presentation clearly and accurately provides at least four peer-reviewed systematic review type articles selected, describes the levels of evidence in each of the four articles selected, including a thorough and detailed explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Using proper in-text citations, the presentation accurately provides at least four systematic review type peer-reviewed articles selected including adequate explanation of the levels of evidence, the strengths of using a systematic review for

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Using proper in-text citations, the presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis or outside resources related to the systematic review type peer-reviewed articles selected. The response minimally explains the levels of evidence and the strengths of using a systematic review and/or minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources related to the articles selected and fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation or is missing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource FormattingAppropriate peer-reviewed articles are included and citations use APA format.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation includes 4 or more peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …Citations use correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Presentation includes 3 peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …Citations use correct APA format with few (1-2) errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Presentation includes 2 peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …Citations contain several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Presentation includes 1 or no resources. … Citations contain many >5 APA format errors.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint Presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

NUR 620

1. Reply from Daniela Barbeito Depression Case Summary of the Clinical Case Ms. Z is a 28-year-old assistant store manager who appears sad after she had a breakup one month ago. On the subjective, she complains that she has low mood, oversleeping, fatigue despite long sleep duration, lack of concentration

NUR 504 Module 4 Discussion

Module 4 Discussion   The Homeless Patient Evaluation & Management Plan The nurse practitioner (NP) is working at a health clinic in a homeless shelter during the early evening. A 48-year-old African American man approaches the practitioner and asks to have his blood pressure taken, saying that he has not

Clinical module 4 discussion

Module 4 Discussion   Weekly Clinical Experience 4 Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? (identifying the needed studies needed for the patients’ symptoms) · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S),

Interprofessional Education

see attachment The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate how interprofessional education has evolved within the health care environment to support a more team-based approach to patient-centered health care. In a paper of 500-750 words, address the following points: 1. Define interprofessional education, explain how it was developed, and discuss the goals

Children and Families Clinicals Discussion 4

Weekly Clinical Experience 4 Describe your clinical experience for this week with a 10-month-old male with conjunctivitis · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least

Children and Family Discussion 4

Approaches to Disease Management: Dermatologic Disorder Discuss Impetigo in pediatrics, a dermatologic disorder, and its treatment modalities. Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

see attachment

MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK. 4-6 pages long. APA format. 3-5 scholarly resources from the last 5 years. On topic below.  Teaching Plan Paper (30 points) APA Paper  • Target Population: Adolescent boy ages 13-17 pertaining to mental health, 14 participants  o Who is your target audience? – include age of

NUR 620

 Patient Care After studying Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following: The unlawful restraint of a patient can be a legal pitfall for the PMHNP.  K.W. was found eating hamburgers out of a Mcdonald’s dumpster and drinking water from an old water hose.  She had not taken a bath

HW

Professional Goal and Objectives: (SMART) · Professional goals and objectives are related to this course’s clinical rotation (practicum).  · Please note that the SMART goals and objectives you submit must be professional in nature. · During your clinical practicum, you will have the opportunity to work side-by-side with an expert (RN

Discussion

Module 5 Assignment PICOT Question Assignment effective strategies to decrease pediatric obesity in primary care settings.  This is certainly an area/challenge that FNPs are constantly faced with in primary care and particularly with some specific cultures or ethnic groups

Week 3 discu

General Instructions: Conflict is common in healthcare settings. Common team sources of conflict include hierarchical relationships, authority differentials, poor communication, negative or disruptive behaviors, and multigenerational interprofessional teams.    Include the following sections:  Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.  Describe a conflict you have encountered in your nursing

NUR509W4

DISCUSSION: The nurse practitioner (NP) is working at a health clinic in a homeless shelter during the early evening. A 48-year-old African American man approaches the practitioner and asks to have his blood pressure taken, saying that he has not had it checked “in a while”. The man appears to

NUR509CL 4

DISCUSSION: Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales. (CASE: R shoulder

nurse sam

Anemia Classification Instructions: For each of the scenarios below, identify the following: 1. Type of anemia a. Folate Deficiency b. Anemia of Inflammation c. Iron Deficiency Anemia d. Vitamin B12 Deficiency e. Thalassemia 2. Classification of anemia a. Microcytic-hypochromic b. Macrocytic-normochromic c. Normocytic-normochromic 3. After identifying the type and class,

nursing

To Prepare: Review resources about contextual factors. Consider how contextual factors will impact your advocacy priority.  By Day 3 of Week 4 Post a response detailing the following:  Which contextual factors will promote getting your advocacy priority on the agenda?  Which contextual factors might work against it?

nursing

To prepare: Search databases in the Walden Library and locate a peer-reviewed article from the last 5 years that uses a randomized controlled trial study design. The subject of the study may be any topic professionally relevant or interesting to your practice. You may not select an article already posted by

AMP450Effective Leadership Approaches and Models in Health Care

Effective leadership is integral to quality health care. Following global crisis, crucial leadership skills are needed to not only navigate stressful situations with the collaboration of the interprofessional health care team but also to lead with innovation and find solutions for the future.

AMP450Topic 1 DQ 2

Describe two unique challenges that health care leaders face and how leadership theories can address these challenges.