Cultural Interview Assignment
· Contact an individual from the cultural group selected in module two (with their consent) and conduct a cultural interview.
· This interview can be in person, over the phone, or through a video call.
· The person is : a White American Christian female
· Respect the interviewee’s privacy and cultural beliefs.
· Be sure to answer the following questions in the presentation:
· Questions
1. In decision-making concerning health, how much do your family intervene?
·
2. If anyone in the family is ill, how do families assist the sick member?
·
3. In what ways does your religion affect decisions that are related to your health?
·
4. Are there particular religious practices that are essential to you when you are sick?
·
5. Would you like to share with me any traditional health practices that are prevalent in your
culture?
·
6. How do you integrate traditional approaches with formal medical care?
·
7. In terms of health communication from doctors and other healthcare providers, which
method do you prefer?
·
8. Are there any strategies that make you feel more comfortable or respected during your
encounters with your doctors and other healthcare givers?
·
9. In your culture, can you enumerate some of the regular foods that you take and their
religious/cultural implication on your diet?
·
10. In as much as your cultural diets influence your health, how do you modify your diet
when you are sick?
·
· Did your preconceptions or stereotypes influence the interview process?
· What cultural factors emerged during the interview that could impact healthcare decisions?
· How might you adapt your nursing practice to provide culturally competent care for individuals from this cultural group based on the interview insights?
Submission Instructions:
· The presentation is to be original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citations and references.
· The PowerPoint presentation should consist of 10-15 slides
|
Presentation Rubric |
||
|
Presentation Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
Identification of Main Issues/Problems |
4 pts Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems. 3 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems. 2 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. 1 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. 0 pts No Submission |
/ 4 pts |
|
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms |
4 pts Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 3 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems. 2 pts Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 1 pts Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 0 pts No Submission |
/ 4 pts |
|
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding |
4 pts Distinguished Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding. 3 pts Excellent Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 2 pts Fair Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 1 pts Poor Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 0 pts No Submission |
/ 4 pts |
|
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature |
4 pts Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. 3 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 2 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 1 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. 0 pts No Submission |
/ 4 pts |
|
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines view longer description |
4 pts Full Marks Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. 3 pts Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 2 pts Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 1 pts Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. 0 pts No Submission |
/ 4 pts |
|
Total Points: 0 |
·
How to submit Canvas Studio media as a File Upload
· Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).
· Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.
· Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
· You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
View Rubric
