Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Business Finance – Management Literature Review: Final Assignment

Literature Review Assignment Instructions  see attachment

BUSI 770

Literature Review Assignment Instructions

Literature Review: Outline Assignment

Overview

A critical skill at the doctoral level is the ability to conduct scholarly research guided by clearly articulated research questions that address a specific issue or problem. For this literature review, your research will be guided by the following three Research Questions:

1. How do individual and group decision processes aid or impede business decision making?

2. What are the latest developments in the process of strategy development and execution?

3. How can

my academic discipline
(see note below), as a function within the organization, influence the process of business strategy development and execution?

The first two questions are explored from a broad business perspective, while the third question gives you the opportunity to change your frame of reference to your specific cognate in the Doctoral Program.

Note: The third research question deals with your
Cognate (from your DCP) as a function that is performed in a business. This is not exploring your degree program, the courses you have taken, or higher education in any way. You will replace the words ‘my academic discipline’ in Research Question 3 with your actual academic discipline from your DCP. Examples of academic disciplines include Finance, Marketing, Accounting, Information Systems, International Business Management.

The purpose of this research project is for you to create a scholarly piece of doctoral level research and writing which conforms to current APA format.

For this initial assignment, you will be developing the outline for your literature review. Use the Research Questions as provided in the instructions above. Your outline will include a minimum of one level of indentation below each Research Question with not less than two sub‐headings not including the Summary. Following each sub-heading you will provide a one to two sentence description of what you will cover in that section of the literature review. Do not provide any narrative beyond what is being requested and be sure to include citations for any factual assertions you make in your descriptions. The sources documents for all citations provided must be included in the Reference section. Your headings must be descriptive to allow a reader to understand what is included each section and subsection. You can include more than two subheadings for each Research Question and additional levels of indentation if required for your discussion. In the final module you will be submitting your completed literature review.

Use the format below:

Introduction

Level 1 ‐ RQ1

Level 2 ‐ Sub heading 1

Level 2 – Sub heading 2

Summary

Level 1 – RQ2

Level 2 ‐ Sub heading 1

Level 2 – Sub heading 2

Summary

Level 1 – RQ3

Level 2 ‐ Sub heading 1

Level 2 – Sub heading 2

Summary

Conclusion

References

You must attach a word document (.docx).

Literature Review: Final Assignment

Overview

A critical skill at the doctoral level is the ability to conduct scholarly research guided by clearly articulated research questions that address a specific issue or problem. It is important that you include and address the research questions provided.

Changing the research question changes the focus of the study, and the resulting document will not meet the requirements for the literature review.
For this literature review, your research will be guided by the following three research questions:

1. How do individual and group decision processes aid or impede business decision making?

2. What are the latest developments in the process of strategy development and execution?

3. How can

my academic discipline
(see note below), as a function within the organization, influence the process of business strategy development and execution?

The first two questions are explored from a broad business perspective, while the third question gives you the opportunity to change your frame of reference to your specific cognate in the Doctoral Program.

Note: The third research question deals with your
Cognate (from your DCP) as a function that is performed in a business. This is not exploring your degree program, the courses you have taken, or higher education in any way. You will replace the words ‘my academic discipline’ in Research Question 3 with your actual academic discipline from your DCP. Examples of academic disciplines include Finance, Marketing, Accounting, Information Systems, International Business Management.


What are we looking for in this literature review?

A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area and sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period. This literature review will be more than just a simple summary of information from various sources as it will include an organizational pattern that combines both a summary and synthesis of information. Please keep in mind that a summary is a re‐encapsulation of the important information found in the source, while a synthesis is a re‐organization and combining of that information to present a more complete picture. Finally, the literature review will evaluate the sources and advise the reader of the most pertinent or relevant points.


How will this literature review be evaluated?

Your work will be evaluated in the areas listed below. Be sure to review the grading rubric to ensure that you have addressed all areas that will be evaluated. If you are uncertain or have questions reach out to your professor right away for clarification.

Content

Required page count

Relevance of Information

Academic Level of Information

Quality of Information

Sources of Information

Structure

Organization of Information

Adherence to Formatting Instructions and APA Style Guide

Important note regarding required page count: Assignments must meet the minimum page count indicated in the instructions. Documents that are short of the required page count as well as documents that address a different subject matter than assigned in the instructions by altering the research questions will have the Content area scores reduced as described below.

For documents that fail to meet the content word/page count called for in the instructions, the professor will multiply the score in each Content area by the percentage actualy provided. Example:

· The instructions call for 10 pages of content and the student provides 5 pages of content.

· Content score for Academic Level of Information is determined to be 16 out of 20.

· That Content score is multiplied by 0.5 for a final Content score of 8 out of 20 for Academic Level of Information. This is done for each Content area in the rubric.

· The professor will provide an explanation in the Comments section of the rubric.


Are there differences between plagiarism, paraphrasing, and quoting?

Paraphrasing is when you take a source or someone else’s idea and say it in your own words or even combine the ideas of several authors as well as your own. When you paraphrase, you will still give the author credit through the use of an in‐text citation connected to the idea as well as a reference at the end of the paper.

A direct quote from a source has quotation marks around the quote. If 40 words or more in length, it must be set in block quotation format. You can refer to the APA guide for more information on this.


At the doctoral level, you should be relying almost exclusively on the use of paraphrasing to allow synthesis of the original author’s views with your own.
A direct quotation should only be used in this literature review (or most other documents you will produce) when paraphrasing would change the author’s intended meaning. In other words, you should only use a quotation when it is the only way to convey what the author intended to convey.

Plagiarism on the other hand exists when the writer simply copies the words directly from the source without giving credit with an in‐text citation and a reference. Plagiarism is not permitted and the paper will not be accepted for grading.


Specific Instructions:

· Follow the outline generated in the Literature Review: Outline Assignment to include any feedback from your instructor.

· Use the Research Questions as provided in the instructions

· Minimum of 24 pages of written content, not including introduction, conclusion, front matter, reference section, and any tables or figures provided.

· No less than 8 pages of content addressing each research question

· Minimum of 18 current sources not including course texts

· No less than 6 current sources for each research question not including the course texts

· 1 inch margins, Double Spaced, 12 point font

· Include Cover Page, Abstract, Table of Contents, and Reference Section

· Follow APA (Professional Version) current edition for all formatting

Note: Your Literature Review: Final Assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Page 2 of 2

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Week 8 MGMT601

 align and discuss the implications for organizational commitment   Assignment Directions:  You will conduct an interview with a colleague or contact currently employed, focusing on their perceptions of the psychological contract with their employer. You will then write a 3–5-page report outlining the unwritten expectations from both the employee and

Week 8

 a major impact on the organization’s ability to operate globally.   Assignment Directions This assignment assesses CO-1, CO-2, CO-3, CO-4, CO-5.  [content page] You will conduct an organizational global readiness for your organization or one you are interested in working for. You will include and/or assess the following: 1. Organizational

Week 5 Discussion- Delivery of Healthcare

Continuum of Care Scenario: Team A Discussion 2  For this team Discussion, you will have the opportunity to review the work of others and provide them with peer-reviewed feedback, as well as consider how their continuum of care might be improved. Further, you will be able to compare and contrast

Financial Forecasting

Financial Forecasting project, Complete the Income Statement and Balance Sheet on the appropriate tabs in the Financial Forecasting Template, using the downloaded data. Calculate the expenses to determine what will change and what will remain the same. Summarize your rationale, within each line item expense.

Future Recommendations for Leaders in the 21st Century

Planning and Decision-Making in Public Health Organizations, Public Health and the Fundamentals of Managing It, Ethics for Public Health Managers and Workforce Diversity Pick one interest to discuss….. Reflect on an aspect(s) of this course that was or were of particular interest to you or might have implications for choices

FINCB/571: Corporate Finance Competency 3 – Assessment

   Course Title: Corporate Finance Competency Assessment Title: Financial Plan Total Number of Points: 100 Assignment Directions Review the company you chose to work with in Competencies 1 and 2. Describe the business, including the type of business. Create the business case: • Determine why funding is needed for the

BUSINESS( NO PLAGARISM A+ WORK, ON TIME)

tutor discussion & assignment 2 Week 7 Assignment Name University Course BUSN604: Fundamentals of Business Analysis Instructor Date Introduction Introduce the topic for this paper. Discuss the how, what, why, where, who as you determine the feasibility of investing in a new product line in a foreign country, or keeping

Final

see attachments for instructions and readings  Your essay should be between 1000 to 1100 words and use citations and a bibliography using MLA (or other recognizable citation) style. Essay Option 3: Compare the approaches to bargaining preparation, impasse and mobilization including strikes presented in the Turning the Tables text and

MKTG201

see attached Running head: GUIDED IMAGERY AND PROGRESSIVE MUSCLE RELAXATION 2 1 Title of Paper in Bold Centered Student Name American Public University COURSE####: Course Title Instructor Name Due Date Repeat the Title – Level 1 Header Hit the tab key one time to begin the main body of the

BUSN100

see attached Instructions Assignment Instruction: Portfolio Assignment: Visit the Course Tools / Portfolio tab of the classroom and view the following video about the use of Portfolio:  Portfolio Video . The Entrepreneur’s Playbook [Managing the Business Lifecycle] In this assignment, you will take on the role of a Founder/CEO of

Your Guide to Zoro Anime & Free HD Streaming in 2025

 For fans searching for free anime, Zoro Anime has been a popular name, but finding a safe, reliable platform can be tricky with domain changes. This guide explores Zoro Anime alternatives and how to stream safely, ensuring you always have access to your favorite shows without compromise. We will cover

rephrase

i have to rephrase the highlighted sentence in order to remove the AI detector.  [removed]

Unit III

See attached Strategic Analysis: Stocks, Options, and Bonds Evaluation In this assignment, you will dive deep into the realm of stocks, bonds, and options, leveraging the knowledge and tools acquired in Units I-III. Through a fictitious company scenario, you will evaluate various investment avenues, assess potential risks, analyze the time

D8

This week, you are required to produce your Final Course Project Report. You will consolidate all project deliverables produced in prior weeks into your Final Course Project Report. You will add one additional section for Lessons Learned. In this section, you will describe the strengths and areas of improvement within

Week 4 MGMT600

 metaphors to understand management practice within organizations  Assignment Directions: GOAL:  Create a case study analysis based on two scholarly studies that utilize metaphors (Morgan’s or similar) to describe the functionality of organizations. After a concise but thorough analysis of the cases, summarize the benefits of using metaphorical devices in management practice.

Week 7

 ommunication tools and techniques, strategies for maintaining team cohesion