Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

advance patho

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

An understanding of the factors surrounding women’s and men’s health can be critically important to disease diagnosis and treatment in these areas. This importance is magnified by the fact that some diseases and disorders manifest differently based on the sex of the patient. 

Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond the human systems involved. The impact of patient characteristics, as well as racial and ethnic variables, can also have an important impact.

An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in systems based on these characteristics is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health. 

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

· The factors that affect fertility (STDs).

· Why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID.

· Why prostatitis and infection happens. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 10

Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by 
Day 7 of Week 10.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at 

to an external site.
). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
WK10Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following as it relates to the case you were assigned (omit section that does not pertain to your case, faculty will give full points for that section): Explain the factors that affect fertility (STDs)

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

21 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the life span and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.

21 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why prostatitis and infection happen. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.

25 to >22.5 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

22.5 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

20 to >17.5 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.

17.5 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time….The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

This week we will be discussing women’s and men’s infections and hematologic disorders. There is a knowledge check and a case study this week. The knowledge check will consist of five questions that require an essay type response. Keep in mind that if you use the work of another you must cite the reference. There is also a case study that will need to be reviewed and followed up with a one to two page paper.

 

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following as it applies to the scenario you were provided 
(Below is a list of questions that will need to be addressed within your paper. Not all will apply to scenario. You will need address all of the questions even if they are not directly related to the scenario):

· The factors that affect fertility (STDs).

· Why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID.

· Why prostatitis and infection happens. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.

· Why a patient would need a splenectomy after a diagnosis of ITP.

· Anemia and the different kinds of anemia (i.e., micro and macrocytic).

Case Scenario:

 

A 30-year-old female presents to the emergency room with a chief complaint of yellow, creamy vaginal discharge and difficulty with urination.  She states these symptoms started about 3 days ago, and she thought she had a urinary tract infection. She denies pelvic pain.  The patient had unprotected sexual intercourse in the last two weeks with her new partner. She denies any lower back pain or foul-smelling urine or frequency. PMH is negative.

Vital signs T 98.8 F Pulse 80 Resp 22 O2 sat 99% on room air. Cardio-respiratory exam unremarkable for murmurs, rubs, clicks, or gallops. Abdominal exam negative for any pain or tenderness to deep palpation.  Pelvic exam demonstrates mucopurulent vaginal discharge and erythema to cervix with some bleeding noted to the cervix when touched with the swab.  No masses on bimanual exam.

 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

case study

Please help me fill out attach form  Dermatologic Differential of Common Skin Lesions and Rashes Name Cause Sign/symptoms Diagnostics Treatment Concerns Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever Tick bite Rickettsia rickettsii Fever, chills, severe headache, n/v, photophobia, myalgia, conjunctival injection, arthralgia; 2-5 days after onset – rash (petechiae) starts on hands/feet to

Case Study Musculoskeletal System

 case study musculoskeletal A 58-year-old female presents to the clinic with a complaint of worsening knee pain over the past two years. She describes the pain as a deep, aching sensation that worsens with activity, particularly after long periods of standing or walking. She reports morning stiffness that lasts about

NATIONAL AND GLOBAL NURSING PROFESSION ISSUES

What issues are affecting healthcare? How do these issues affect you, your practice, and/or your organization? How do these issues affect your patients?  Throughout this course you have identified and supported an advocacy priority, focusing specifically on how best to move the agenda forward. Now is your opportunity to explore

Reflection

Describe two reasons why your ROLE or purpose for interviewing changes as an Advanced Practice Nurse. Identify one *skilled interviewing technique you plan to use the next time you interview a patient.  How does the technique support the therapeutic patient-provider relationship?  

Discussion 2

Your course project is all about planning, designing, and evaluating a program. Thus, choosing an appropriate program planning model is key to your course project. Knowing each program planning model’s characteristics, advantages, and limitations will help you choose an appropriate model and use it effectively in your project work. Explore

select A model

Please see instruction. Develop a 3 page scholarly paper in which you describe the diagnosis you researched for the previous assessment, and then identify and analyze credible evidence that could be used as the basis for applying EBP to the issue. The goal of using evidence-based research findings is to

pico

please see instruction. Create a 3 page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments and evaluate the evidence you locate, which could help to answer the question. PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects

case study-script

please see instruction Create a (script-layman’s terms.Plain language)5-10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you will propose an evidence-based plan to improve the outcomes of the patient in the provided case study, and examine how remote collaboration provided benefits or challenges to designing and delivering the care.

SDOH AND SOCIAL CHANGE

“A good intention, with a bad approach, often leads to a poor result.” ―Thomas Edison   The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has identified five areas that impact one’s social determinants of health (SDOH), which include economic stability, education, social and community context, health and healthcare, and

Week2 : Appraisal of Quantitative Research

Use the Galen library database to find one primary quantitative research article on any nursing topic recently published this year in a nursing journal. Read the article and in one paragraph (7 to 8 sentences) provide a rapid critical appraisal by answering the following questions. Support your response by citing

NGR6002c Advanced Health Assessment

Directions: Read over the SOAP note and formulate a primary diagnosis.  Based on the diagnosis complete the SOAP note with the details that would be expected for the diagnosis. Use UptoDate and/or Dyna MedPlus to find out what is expected from the history and physical, diagnostic workup and management for the

NGR5131 Cultural and advanced nursing practice

Topic: Ecuadorian Culture. Instructions: This is a formal paper that requires correct grammar, punctuation, and APA format. This paper will also be used to post for a  Group Discussion to the Cultural Communication Discussion. You do not need to do a running head for this paper, nor do you need an abstract.

Nursing Shock assignment

Assignment about Septic shock. Please use language that is appropriate for a 20 year old. No plagerism. QSEN Writing Assignment Rubric NURS 2115 Name________________________________ QSEN Competency Criteria Points Comments Patient-Centered Care (25 points) Explain the most crucial patient needs of a patient in septic shock (5 points) Discusses the importance

Autisim

Diagnosis:  Autism Spectrum Disorder   Prepare a study guide for your disorder-Autism Spectrum Disorder . This should be in the form of an outline with references, and you should incorporate visual elements such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards. Be creative! It should not be

Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

Files attached below, thank you! Instructions: The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a health care setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the safety quality

HIT 1450 MOD 6 DB

 Discuss your new insight on coding for diagnoses in ICD-10-CM.  What challenges did you face when assigning ICD-10-CM codes? What did you like the best about the ICD-10-CM coding process? Next, read the AHIMA Standards of Ethical Coding.  Discuss how you will comply with ethical standards of the practice. 

W2 Picot

 Use the practice problem identified in the Week 1 discussion and include the sections below. Select a practice change that is client-focused, specific, measurable, and related to your future role in advanced nursing practice. Nurse practitioner students must choose a practice change that impacts client care directly and avoid topics