Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

EVIDENCE BASED

Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course. 

· Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.

· Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

· Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

· The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

· A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

· A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

By Day 7 of Week 3

Submit your Evidence-Based Project.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
 MD2Assgn+last name+first initial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: *The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach.

90 to >80.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

80 to >71.0 pts

Good

The response accurately provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

71 to >62.0 pts

Fair

The response provides incomplete or inaccurate citations of each peer-reviewed article in APA format. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

62 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing. …The responses inaccurately & vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing.

90 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or synthesis is missing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Chilablws

What are the requirements for reporting abuse in Florida? What are the requirements related to confidentiality of records and universal precautions related to bodily fluids? What are some of the most common signs of each of the forms of abuse? What do you do when you suspect that abuse has

PORTFOLIO

CARE PLAN ASSESSMENT NURSING DIAGNOSIS OBJECTIVE SUBJECTIVE PROBLEM(S) ETIOLOGY SIGNS & SYMPTOMS IMPLEMENTATION OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OUTCOMES EVIDENCED BY NURSING INTERVENTION INTERVENTION RATIONALE DESIRED OUTCOMES FAKE NAME: PATIENT/ROOM NO: DATE: OBJECTIVE: SUBJECTIVE: Text2: Text3: Text4: Text5: Text6: Text7: Text8: Text9: Text1:

nurse help

  Review “An Integrated Ethical-Decision-Making Model for Nurses” from the University Library.  Apply the ethical decision-making model in the article to access the Our Pregnant Daughter Didn’t Want This… case study from the Center for Practical Bioethics. Review the Questions for Discussion following the case.  Follow the steps provided in the model, including the following:  Step 1: Explain the ethical

PPP

Assigment The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book,  The Landmarks of Tomorrow  (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar? Nurses are

Can you help by tomorrow?

Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: · Lesson Instructions  Introduction Imagine you are a home healthcare worker employed by Ministering Angels Health Services. You have been assigned a new client, and we’ll call her Mrs. Evans. She is 86 years old and suffered a stroke. She was recently at a

help with home work

Nus 507 Unit 8 assignment: NU507-4: Synthesize the effect healthcare reform has on stakeholders Directions For this assignment, you will examine the stakeholders impacted by the implementation of the No Surprise Act. Your paper must include the following: · Introduction: identify the purpose of the assignment · Define the No Surprise

Clinical Nursing Scenario: Sickle Cell Disease with Pneumonia

ACTIVE LEARNING TEMPLATES TherapeuTic procedure A9 Nursing Skill STUDENT NAME _____________________________________ SKILL NAME ____________________________________________________________________________ REVIEW MODULE CHAPTER ___________ ACTIVE LEARNING TEMPLATE: Description of Skill Indications Outcomes/Evaluation CONSIDERATIONS Nursing Interventions (pre, intra, post) Potential Complications Client Education Nursing Interventions STUDENT NAME: SKILL NAME: REVIEW MODULE CHAPTER: Indications: Outcomes/Evaluation: Client Education: Potential

response- ALTERATIONS IN CELLULAR PROCESSES

respond to the 2 persons in the attach Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days and respectfully agree or disagree with your colleague’s assessment and explain your reasoning. In your explanation, include why their explanations make physiological sense or why they do not.

MR soaps

Mr soap 1 SOAP Note Assignment Instructions Consider constructing a Word document ‘SOAP note template’ and use it to assemble your note. By doing this you can use the template for efficiently constructing your SOAP notes such that you will be able to copy-and-paste for your weekly assignments. NOTE: If

Rw 2 soaps

Rw 2 soaps 1 SOAP Note Assignment Instructions Consider constructing a Word document ‘SOAP note template’ and use it to assemble your note. By doing this you can use the template for efficiently constructing your SOAP notes such that you will be able to copy-and-paste for your weekly assignments. NOTE:

Home work

Competencies · Explain foundations of global health. · Analyze the incidence, distribution, and control of emerging healthcare concerns in global populations. · Evaluate the impact of global disease surveillance processes among global populations. · Integrate social determinants, ethical concerns, and human rights for high-risk and vulnerable global populations. · Critique

quickly complete

please complete a discussion post following the instructions and rubric Instructions: To prepare: Read and view the Learning Resources, focusing especially on Chapter 4 of Bissett et al. (2025). Choose one of the topics (from the “Falls” topic list) in the resources and read the three articles presented.  View the

Nursing homework

My Topic is Rapids respone vs. Code Blue: Knowing when to act Part 2: STAFF EDUCATION PRESENTATION (35 points) ***The use of Artificial Intelligence to complete this project is strictly prohibited.** II. PART 2: THE PRESENTATION – you do NOT write a separate paper The Staff Education plan will be

NUR507W7

DISCUSSION: A 6-year-old has a yellow vaginal discharge. The examination is otherwise normal. · What are key points in the history and physical examination? · How would you approach differ if the patient were a sexually active 16-year-old? · What are similarities and differences in the approach? INSTRUCTIONS: · Your

Community Health Promotion

Please attached Community: Liberia For this assessment, you will use the community from your windshield (Liberia)survey OR you may select a community from the Assessment 3 Supplement: Disaster Recovery Plan [PDF]. You will then develop a brochure, storyboard, or poster communicating the plan for the local system city officials, and

NUR507W7A

Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case that was seen during your experience or a topic that is of interest to you. (OSTEOMYELITIS) 1. Provide information about the incidence, prevalence, and pathophysiology of the disease/disorder to the cellular level. · Differential Diagnosis 2. Educate advanced practice nurses on ·