Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

EVIDENCE BASED

Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course. 

· Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.

· Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

· Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

· The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

· A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

· A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

By Day 7 of Week 3

Submit your Evidence-Based Project.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
 MD2Assgn+last name+first initial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: *The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach.

90 to >80.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

80 to >71.0 pts

Good

The response accurately provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

71 to >62.0 pts

Fair

The response provides incomplete or inaccurate citations of each peer-reviewed article in APA format. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

62 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing. …The responses inaccurately & vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing.

90 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or synthesis is missing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

dexcom glucose monitor

features, functions, and potential benefits of dexcom glucose monitor  Features, Functions, [Insert an image of the wearable technology.] [Provide education on the safety precautions, the appropriate usage of the device, and possible limitations when using the chosen wearable technology.] Example: Safety Precautions · Always… (Author, year) · Clean the… ·

Nursing Critical Research Appraisal Assignment

Critical Research Appraisal Assignment Goal: You will critically appraise a research design Content Requirements:  You will select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative design and answer the following questions regarding the following categories: 1. Discuss what is meant by the term Qualitative Research · Briefly,

EBP

Module 6:  Article Grading Table Instructions Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question. Clinical Question: In patients

EBP

Module 6: Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: Identifying Them in Journals Instructions Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals. Once all the articles considered important to

Divreprecont

Diversity Project: Final Submission In this module, you will be summarizing your work up to this point on the Diversity Project and then you will give a clear indication of how such a study will enhance diversity within the organization and promote the best interests of the company. Please fill

home work

Competency Critique access to global healthcare Scenario As a clinical nursing instructor working in a global health setting, you are creating a case study for your nursing students to help them better understand access to global healthcare. Instructions Based on a current global health problem, develop a case study scenario

home work

Competency Propose an evidence-based solution aligned with an evidence-based practice question. Scenario You are practicing on an acute care unit in a local hospital. During your recent shifts, you identified a practice problem that you would like to see changed. After discussing the issue with your direct supervisor and the

After reading carefully the instructions, use the template attached.

5 pag of length no including title or references. READ instructions  1 1 Sustainable Development Goals and Millennium Goals Student Name Miami Regional University DNP 7900: Global Health Professor Name Month, Year Header Here for the Title Purpose of the assignment: Evaluate and explore the correlation between the Millennium Development

Nursing Assignment

Culture “Poster” Project Group Assignments Categories Native American Group #1 Social Customs Vietnamese Group #2 Health care practices Hmong Group #3 Barriers to care Philippines Group #4 Gender roles/sexuality Somali Group #5 Birth/death practices Hispanic/Mexican Group #6 Nutrition Jewish Group #7 Religion Black American Group #8 “Fun” Facts (Interesting) Italian

Question

“I Hear America Singing” (1860) 1. How does Walt Whitman portray the diverse occupations and activities of Americans in “I Hear America Singing”? 2. What is the significance of the individuals mentioned in the poem singing their own songs? 3. How does Whitman capture the essence of American life and

NUR507W5

DISCUSSION: A 2-month-old is identified during newborn screening with sickle cell anemia. · How would you manage this patient at 2 months, 2 years, 6 years, and at 13 years old? · What are the issues for each stage in development? · Where would you refer this child? · How

HIMS 645 ASS 6

Review the  Python Tutorial (  Python Tutorial (w3schools.com)   or   for creating MySQL database and write  syntaxes  used for the following actions: 1. Create  a Database named  mydatabse. 2. Create  a Table within mydatabse named  Customers 3. Insert  data in the  Customers table. 4. Select  all records from the  Customers table 5. Sort

Nursing week 7_Assignment_DNP855

 Strategic Communication  Assignment 7.2 Strategic Communication Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses all of the information and readings mentioned below. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least FOUR (4) PEER REVIWED

Journal Response MODULE 7

 what are three new methods   Overview Strategic communication is a purposeful type of communication to communicate goals and messages in an organization to fulfill its mission. This week we focus on communication strategies and how they impact healthcare. Strategic communication educates, influences, and informs decision-making. Communication processes are pivotal

Discussion #5

Module 5 Discussion   Approaches to Disease Management: Sickle Cell Anemia After studying Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following: Read Garzon, D. L., Driessnack, M., Dirks, M., Duderstadt, K. G., & Gaylord, N. M. (2024). · Chapter 20: Dental and Oral Health · Chapter 30: Eye and Vision

NUR 640

NUR 640 Weekly Discussion FYI Remember… I am a Black Haitian American Female live in USA, FL Submission Instructions: • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points. Week

Discussion help x2

   1. Discussion Board Topic #1, Navigating the Outrage: Communication Strategies in Crisis Management. 2. Discussion Board Topic #2, Managing Difficult Conversations at Work.

help with home work

Nu 507 Unit 6 assignment Course Outcome covered in this assignment: NU507-3: Recommend public policy options to meet the needs of various stakeholders. Directions For this assignment, you will create a slide and audio presentation in which you will present information in support of your position, whether pro or con, on