Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

evidence based instruction

Evidence-Based Project, Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?

In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

 
To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

· Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.

· Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.

· Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

· Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

· Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

· Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

· Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.

· Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 7 of Week 5

Submit Part 2 of your Evidence-Based Project.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
MD3Assgn+last name+first initial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

80 to >71.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the developed PICO(T) question. …The presentation clearly and accurately identifies four or more research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. …The presentation includes specific and relevant examples that fully support the research. …The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and accurate synthesis of two outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected, and fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation.

71 to >63.0 pts

Good

The presentation accurately identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation accurately describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation accurately identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. …The presentation includes relevant examples that support the research presented.

63 to >55.0 pts

Fair

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. …The presentation includes inaccurate or vague examples to support the research presented.

55 to >0 pts

Poor

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest or is missing. …The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question or is missing. …The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies less than four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected or is missing. …The presentation includes inaccurate and vague examples to support the research presented or is missing.

80 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Using proper in-text citations, the presentation clearly and accurately provides at least four peer-reviewed systematic review type articles selected, describes the levels of evidence in each of the four articles selected, including a thorough and detailed explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Using proper in-text citations, the presentation accurately provides at least four systematic review type peer-reviewed articles selected including adequate explanation of the levels of evidence, the strengths of using a systematic review for

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Using proper in-text citations, the presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis or outside resources related to the systematic review type peer-reviewed articles selected. The response minimally explains the levels of evidence and the strengths of using a systematic review and/or minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources related to the articles selected and fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation or is missing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource FormattingAppropriate peer-reviewed articles are included and citations use APA format.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation includes 4 or more peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …Citations use correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Presentation includes 3 peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …Citations use correct APA format with few (1-2) errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Presentation includes 2 peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …Citations contain several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Presentation includes 1 or no resources. … Citations contain many >5 APA format errors.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint Presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Advance Epidemiology of Nursing

Module 2:  Government Databases Prepare a 500 words essay explaining how government clinical databases can help researchers study different diseases. · · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, with a font size of 12. · Pay attention to grammar rules

Advance Epidemiology of Nursing

Module 1:  Epidemiology Triangle Each student will prepare a paper focused on answering the following guidelines: · Choose a current emerging disease or reemerging disease prevalent in your community or the larger community of the nation or world. · Complete an epidemiology triangle diagram for the chosen disease and thoroughly

Peer response

  What are your initial thoughts after reviewing the AHRQ website? What are your roles and responsibilities related to healthcare literacy? What are some practices as you can use when providing patient care as you transition to the role of APRN? How can you use the website and resources for

Nursing debate assignment

  Debate Assignment: Is the Health Insurance System in the USA the Best? Debate Topic: “The U.S. health insurance system provides better access, cost efficiency, and quality of care compared to other countries.” Instructions for Your Initial Post: Choose a Position: Take a stance for the statement, arguing that the

The Disputed Election or Revolution of 1800

  Describe the historical setting surrounding the Election of 1800.  Assess what constitutional issue the election of 1800 results helped to reveal. What did Congress do to mitigate the issue?  Do you think it was necessary to pass the Twelfth Amendment? Why or why not?  Analyze why the Presidential Election

Population Health and Emerging Disease

  Create an infographic that effectively summarizes the key components of value-based care, particularly in the context of population health and emerging diseases.   The infographic should visually represent the following aspects: Use visuals such as charts, graphs, icons, and text to convey the information.  Definition and Principles of Value-Based Care: 

Anxiety and Panic disorder PPT

please see instructions Using the DSM 5 TR along with other sources please complete 3 separate PPTs for the following: 1. Generalized anxiety disorder 2. Panic disorder 3. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Instructions Must be done for each Diagnosis/ PPT You might also want to check the DSM-5-TR Clinical Cases text

EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY DESIGNS

find attached the instructions As introduced in the first few weeks of this course, investigators use various epidemiological study designs to study health problems and the effects of health interventions. You have examined several study designs, including descriptive designs (in Week 2) and analytic study designs that are observational (in

RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN EPIDEMIOLOGY

use the attached info for this work RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN EPIDEMIOLOGY Imagine that researchers are conducting a randomized controlled trial of a high-fiber supplement as a preventive measure in persons at increased risk of type 2 diabetes. People enrolled in the study are disease free at the time they agree

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

please read the attached information carefully to understand  week 4 Week 4 Case Study Prompt (Student version) A 67-year-old man presents with progressive shortness of breath over 8 months. He  reports: • Increasing dyspnea with exertion • Dry, persistent cough • Fatigue • Decreased exercise tolerance • Unintentional 10-pound weight

Agency Synopsis

Agency Synopsis The purpose of this assignment is so that you will be able to differentiate between the healthcare policy agencies’ impact on various patient populations. 1. Identify regulatory agencies that regulate health and the health care system in the US. 2. Create a table listing at least 5 regulatory

NUR 650

NUR650 Discussions Submission Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style Provide support for your work from at least 2 academic sources less than 5 years old. Wk1 Tom’s Parents are Fighting After studying Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources,

Preventative Care

Following the guidelines of the United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF), discuss and describe the screening recommendations for the following: Cervical cancer Breast cancer Osteoporosis Colorectal cancer Lung cancer Ovarian cancer Intimate partner violence (IPV).

patient care coordination 1

Develop infographic of a preliminary care coordination plan for a selected healthcare problem identified from the Sentinel-U Family Assessment v5. You determine which healthcare problem you will use FROM the simulation. Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural considerations for this healthcare problem. Listen to the patient simulation and select one of

Peer response

  What are your initial thoughts after reviewing the AHRQ website? What are your roles and responsibilities related to healthcare literacy? What are some practices as you can use when providing patient care as you transition to the role of APRN? How can you use the website and resources for

nursing

( Social Media for Nurses ) ( Objectives Locate, evaluate, and share nursing informatics websites, blogs, forums, or social media platforms Create social media workplace guidelines for nurses ) ( Overview Social networking (e.g., Facebook, LinkedIn); 2. Blogging ( and wikis ( 3. Microblogging (e.g., Twitter); 4. Social bookmarking or

casestudy 3

Emergency Nursing Management Activity 2050 Advanced Skills You are Nursing House Supervisor and work with the Nursing Management team at your local hospital. Your hospital is a level 2 Trauma Center and you have access to all resources that are generally acceptable for current health care practices in this environment.

NUR 650

NUR 650 SMART Goals For this assignment, you will work on setting goals for yourself using the SMART method. You will find an explanation of this method in the module that will guide you in your goal-setting process. You will list a minimum of five professional goals that you would like to accomplish during the clinical experience