Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

evidence based instructions

Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Critical Appraisal of Research

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

 
To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

· Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

By Day 7 of Week 7

Submit Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
MD4Assgn+last name+first initial.

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchCritical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. …The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. …The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. …The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3B: Evidence-Based Best PracticesEvidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with the selected resources.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent

The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of the four peer reviewed articles.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good

The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair

The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained.

24 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field or are missing. …A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

The future of Nursing

It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. All posts should be supported by a minimum

Psychopharmacology Discussion Week 1 reply

 Need a response Epigenetics and Gene Expression Epigenetics serves as the regulatory switch for gene expression by modifying chromatin structure without altering the underlying DNA sequence. This system determines how tightly DNA is wound around proteins called histones. When chemical tags like methyl groups are added (methylation), the chromatin condenses,

Psychopharmacology Discussion Week 1 reply TG

Need a response  Main Post As I have been working through my advanced healthcare degree and taking classes such as advanced pharmacology and now psychopharmacology, I have started to see how signal transduction really brings the “why” behind medications to life, especially when I think about mental health treatments. Ion

Nursing Assignment

NU501 Unit 8 Assignment Template/NU501M4 Assessment Template Student Name ______________________________________ Date____________ Faculty Name ____________________________________ NU501-4: Differentiate the professional identity of advanced nursing practice, including accountability to the individual, society, and the profession and compliance with relevant laws, policies, and regulations. Accountability APRN Educator Executive Leader Professional Identity (include content on

Care Plan

In this assignment, you will explore your community’s resources for people who have limited access to affordable, accessible, acceptable food and/or food services (e.g., people who live in a food desert). Using the case study presented below, you will develop a meal plan that is appropriate for the identified medical

help with home work

Nu 506 Unit 8 assignment Telehealth The objective of restructuring the American health care system was to increase quality and access to care and to minimize cost from which a telehealth setting was born. The earliest form of telehealth was the transmission of heart sounds through the telephone in 1878.

Chilablws

What are the requirements for reporting abuse in Florida? What are the requirements related to confidentiality of records and universal precautions related to bodily fluids? What are some of the most common signs of each of the forms of abuse? What do you do when you suspect that abuse has

PORTFOLIO

CARE PLAN ASSESSMENT NURSING DIAGNOSIS OBJECTIVE SUBJECTIVE PROBLEM(S) ETIOLOGY SIGNS & SYMPTOMS IMPLEMENTATION OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OUTCOMES EVIDENCED BY NURSING INTERVENTION INTERVENTION RATIONALE DESIRED OUTCOMES FAKE NAME: PATIENT/ROOM NO: DATE: OBJECTIVE: SUBJECTIVE: Text2: Text3: Text4: Text5: Text6: Text7: Text8: Text9: Text1:

nurse help

  Review “An Integrated Ethical-Decision-Making Model for Nurses” from the University Library.  Apply the ethical decision-making model in the article to access the Our Pregnant Daughter Didn’t Want This… case study from the Center for Practical Bioethics. Review the Questions for Discussion following the case.  Follow the steps provided in the model, including the following:  Step 1: Explain the ethical

PPP

Assigment The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book,  The Landmarks of Tomorrow  (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar? Nurses are

Can you help by tomorrow?

Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: · Lesson Instructions  Introduction Imagine you are a home healthcare worker employed by Ministering Angels Health Services. You have been assigned a new client, and we’ll call her Mrs. Evans. She is 86 years old and suffered a stroke. She was recently at a

help with home work

Nus 507 Unit 8 assignment: NU507-4: Synthesize the effect healthcare reform has on stakeholders Directions For this assignment, you will examine the stakeholders impacted by the implementation of the No Surprise Act. Your paper must include the following: · Introduction: identify the purpose of the assignment · Define the No Surprise

Clinical Nursing Scenario: Sickle Cell Disease with Pneumonia

ACTIVE LEARNING TEMPLATES TherapeuTic procedure A9 Nursing Skill STUDENT NAME _____________________________________ SKILL NAME ____________________________________________________________________________ REVIEW MODULE CHAPTER ___________ ACTIVE LEARNING TEMPLATE: Description of Skill Indications Outcomes/Evaluation CONSIDERATIONS Nursing Interventions (pre, intra, post) Potential Complications Client Education Nursing Interventions STUDENT NAME: SKILL NAME: REVIEW MODULE CHAPTER: Indications: Outcomes/Evaluation: Client Education: Potential

response- ALTERATIONS IN CELLULAR PROCESSES

respond to the 2 persons in the attach Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days and respectfully agree or disagree with your colleague’s assessment and explain your reasoning. In your explanation, include why their explanations make physiological sense or why they do not.

MR soaps

Mr soap 1 SOAP Note Assignment Instructions Consider constructing a Word document ‘SOAP note template’ and use it to assemble your note. By doing this you can use the template for efficiently constructing your SOAP notes such that you will be able to copy-and-paste for your weekly assignments. NOTE: If

Rw 2 soaps

Rw 2 soaps 1 SOAP Note Assignment Instructions Consider constructing a Word document ‘SOAP note template’ and use it to assemble your note. By doing this you can use the template for efficiently constructing your SOAP notes such that you will be able to copy-and-paste for your weekly assignments. NOTE:

Home work

Competencies · Explain foundations of global health. · Analyze the incidence, distribution, and control of emerging healthcare concerns in global populations. · Evaluate the impact of global disease surveillance processes among global populations. · Integrate social determinants, ethical concerns, and human rights for high-risk and vulnerable global populations. · Critique