Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

evidence based instructions

Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Critical Appraisal of Research

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

 
To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

· Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

By Day 7 of Week 7

Submit Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
MD4Assgn+last name+first initial.

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchCritical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. …The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. …The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. …The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3B: Evidence-Based Best PracticesEvidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with the selected resources.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent

The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of the four peer reviewed articles.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good

The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair

The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained.

24 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field or are missing. …A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

nurse

The course learning resources encompasses the concepts of patient safety and quality. Additionally, the resources and assignments promoted the development of an advanced level of professional practice mindset.  This week, you will have an opportunity to reflect on the concepts learned and how they apply to practice. Objectives The unit

Week 8 discussion

Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. Reflect on your learning experience in this course. Which concepts stood out to you and made an impact?  How do you envision using these concepts in your future nursing practice as a master’s prepared nurse?    Describe how course learning activities and assignments will

home work

Competency This deliverable will allow you analyze academic publications in various ways. Instructions Read both  Physician-Assisted Suicide: Finding a Path Forward in a Changing Legal Environment and  The Slippery Slope of Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide. In a 2-3 page comparison essay, address the following; · Determine the main point of each

Nursing wk 3 – assignment 2

i-human practice case As part of your orientation to i-Human Patients, you are required to explore the  Marvin Webster, Jr. practice case to become familiar with the i-Human Patients interface and to start making the transition between the live patient encounter and the virtual patient encounter.   Note: You are allowed  five

Nursing patho assignment 2

attached exercise and instructions In this exercise, you will complete a MindMap to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap. myocardial infarction congenital heart disease (may select ASD, VSD, or PDA) peripheral arterial disease peripheral vascular disease valvular heart

NR 449 W 8

  This area provides you with an opportunity to reflect on what you have learned and what concepts you still need further exploration on.  Answer 1 question. Include a short summary of what has been learned, and include question(s) that are still unclear.   Post your answer to 1 of

home work

Competency This deliverable will allow you to demonstrate your skill in inferring information directly from communication. Instructions In many cases, advertisers sell particular ideas or images along with the product being advertised. Car advertisements, for instance, may emphasize the status of a particular vehicle, the adventurous or thrilling aspects of

Nursing

Describe the role of a nurse in providing holistic patient care. In your answer, explain how nurses address patients’ physical, emotional, social, and psychological needs, and discuss the importance of communication, ethical practice, and teamwork in improving patient outcomes.

nurse

The learning resources in the unit encompassed the concepts of a culture of safety, civility and ‘just culture’. In this assignment, you are tasked with demonstrating your understanding and application of advocacy to promote a just institutional culture in healthcare. This culture must reflect resiliency, civility, and respect, particularly for

VIII HTH

See Attached Unit VIII Essay This two-page essay paper measures your mastery of ULOs 2.4, 3.4, 4.5, and 5.3. In this unit, you reviewed the process for accurate claim processing and the various stages for claim status. Throughout the claim submission and billing process there are many checks and balances

VI HTH

See attached Patient Name: Age: Gender: Date of Admission: Chief Complaint: History of Present Illness (HPI): · Past Medical History (PMH): · Medications: · Physical Exam: · Assessment/Plan: ·

current issues/ trends

see attached You must use the  Presentation Template  Download Presentation Template .  Failure to use the template will result in a 40-point deduction on your grade. 1. Choose from one of the following topics (you may choose a different topic, but it must be pre-approved by your faculty. Failure to

Victims of abuse and violence ppw

Public and community health nursing involves working with vulnerable populations as equal partners with a focus on primary prevention and health promotion. Nurses should incorporate evidence-based nursing practices that demonstrate an awareness of ethnic identities, cultures, and sociocultural practices of local clientele. In this assignment, you will design healthcare education

Nursing App to conc assignment wk 3

Step 1: Choose one of the following vulnerable patients to create a Medication Guide for the patient: Patient 1: 26-year-old female with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder and social anxiety disorder who is increasing in isolation and poor self-care. She is in her third trimester of pregnancy. Patient 2:

MM last week

Mm last week  NU 700 Assignment: Unit 7 – KTA Part 3 Evaluation Measures Instructions: Utilize the template to provide responses to each prompt. Please do not include a cover/title page for the assignment. NAME OF STUDENT: Part 1: Questions Questions: Type Answers in the Spaces below 1. State the

MM last week

Mm last week  NU 700 Assignment: Unit 7 – KTA Part 3 Evaluation Measures Instructions: Utilize the template to provide responses to each prompt. Please do not include a cover/title page for the assignment. NAME OF STUDENT: Part 1: Questions Questions: Type Answers in the Spaces below 1. State the

Nursing Mm last week assignment

Mm last week assignment  Population Health Proposal – Part 2 Community-Level Intervention to Address Adult Obesity Michelle Murray Herzing University Dec 5, 2025 Definition of the Population Adults aged 18–65 receiving outpatient mental health treatment. High prevalence of depression, trauma, and emotional dysregulation. Increased vulnerability to emotional eating and sedentary

help with home work

The product is a single PPT slide, or Diagram in a Word document, presented as a conceptual model. Title must include topic and location/ county/ state. A node is one of the items; circle/ square with a word in it. How you design it, demonstrate concepts, and determine the actions