Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

evidence based instructions

Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Critical Appraisal of Research

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

 
To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

· Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

By Day 7 of Week 7

Submit Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
MD4Assgn+last name+first initial.

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchCritical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. …The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. …The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. …The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3B: Evidence-Based Best PracticesEvidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with the selected resources.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent

The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of the four peer reviewed articles.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good

The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair

The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained.

24 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field or are missing. …A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Nursing WILLY-ASSIGNMENT WEEK 2

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY ATTACHED DOCUEMTN FOR ALL INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS Advanced Practice Nursing: Clinical Decision-Making and Leadership Essay Overview: This assignment invites you to explore the evolution of clinical decision-making as you transition from bedside nursing to advanced practice roles. In your essay, you will critically analyze and compare the

Health promotion

Compare the four levels of prevention (primordial, primary, secondary,  and tertiary) with the levels of service provision available across the  life span

unit 9 journal

see attached 2 part assignment-the case study and questions should be written as a paper with references. Then the self reflection part can just be something for me to read in a video. The purpose of this video is self-reflection regarding the therapeutic process and one’s own role in that

NUR 601 DIscussion #1

Module 1 Discussion   Foundation for Health Promotion For this Discussion, your instructor will assign you a case number. Case  Cases D.H. is a nurse administrator at a large primary practice. His duties include maintaining the nurses’ schedules to keep within the facility’s budget; overseeing the hiring and training of

NUR504W1A

For this assignment, list the parts of a comprehensive mental status examination (MSE) for mental health patients. Give examples of each and describe the significance to the advanced practice nurse.   Submission Instructions · The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar,

SOAP Note

I need to come up with a SOAP note following this specific algorithm. Instructions will be provided. 

WK 6 RESP

Digital Health: Mobile Devices, Wearables, Telehealth, Telemedicine Preparing for her run, Susan tightened her fitness watch on her wrist. After experiencing and having received treatment for a heart arrhythmia, Susan was encouraged to wear the watch that not only would alert her if she experienced an irregular heartbeat, but the

Wk4 health asess

. Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for patients with integumentary conditions. 

XC04

XC4004 Implementation of Educational Component of Practice Change Presentation Evaluation Survey What went well? What could have been done better? What did you learn from this training materials? On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the efficacy, usefulness, and clarity of the information presented? Efficacy 1

case study

Week 5 Soap Note Submit a correctly formatted SOAP note on the identified patient type in a Word document. If the identified patient type was not seen during your clinical, please contact your professor for a patient profile. Patient type: Adult Psychiatric – A 30-year-old African American male presented to

case study

Week 596 Case Study Discussion Prompt: Medication Access Explore and analyze various strategies to address the issue of medication access for patients with chronic conditions who lack prescription coverage. Provide a brief assessment of low-cost measures, including financial assistance programs, community resources, and patient education initiatives in your specific clinical

case study

Week 595 Discussion case study Imagine a 64-year-old woman from a different cultural background than the healthcare provider. She has been living with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for two years. She has been taking metformin (2000 mg/day) without any issues. Her BMI is 32 kg/m². She also has high blood

episode#2

Episodic Visit: Dermatology Focused Note Focused Notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect the experiences to the learning you gain from your weekly Learning Resources. Focused Notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient

Nursing NUR 504 Assignment #1

  Comprehensive Mental Health Examination For this assignment, list the parts of a comprehensive mental status examination (MSE) for mental health patients. Give examples of each and describe the significance to the advanced practice nurse.   Submission Instructions · The paper is to be clear and concise and students will

Nursing NUR 601 Assignment #1

  Therapeutic Relationship Case  Cases J.J is a nurse practitioner who works in a primary care facility. He believes that one of the most important aspects of his work is to foster a therapeutic relationship with his clients. He is using effective communication techniques. Many of his clients have altered

home

15 S 21st St., Suite 205 Fargo, ND 58103     BASIC ASSURANCES SYSTEM     Procedure Title: Basic Assurances System  Procedure Type: Service Operations  Number: 10 Original Date Issued: 03/11/2022  Effective Date: 03/11/2022  Approved By: Gibson W. Jerue, CEO  Approved Date: 03/11/2022  Revision Date(s):   Policy Reference: Basic Assurances System    Disability

Nursing Assignment

Directions: Find something that interests you from each of the four chapters (use PowerPoints or textbook). Post a brief share from each chapter that will add to your classmates’ understanding, insight, or future nursing practice. Your post should look approximately like this: Chapter 30: Here is an experience I’ve had