Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

evidence based instructions

Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Critical Appraisal of Research

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

 
To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

· Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

By Day 7 of Week 7

Submit Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
MD4Assgn+last name+first initial.

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchCritical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. …The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. …The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. …The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3B: Evidence-Based Best PracticesEvidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with the selected resources.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent

The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of the four peer reviewed articles.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good

The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair

The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained.

24 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field or are missing. …A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Nursing Nursing assignment

Instructions Read the scenario below and respond using clear, concise clinical reasoning. Your response must be a paragraph long. This assignment assesses your foundational knowledge of IV insertion, complication recognition, and appropriate nursing interventions. Scenario You begin your shift and take over care for a patient receiving IV fluids at

NR 449 W7D

  This area provides you with an opportunity to reflect on what you have learned and what concepts you still need further exploration on.  Answer 1 question. Include a short summary of what has been learned, and include question(s) that are still unclear.   Post your answer to 1 of

week 2 assigment

see attached The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book, The Landmarks of Tomorrow (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar?

lorem, lpsum

Purpose This assignment increases the students’ awareness of the National Patient Safety Goals developed by The Joint Commission. Specifically, this assignment will introduce the Speak Up Initiatives, an award-winning patient safety program designed to help patients promote their own safety by proactively taking charge of their healthcare. Course outcomes: This

I need help finding PDF forms of 4 articles.

Can you please post the articles when you find them? References Higgins, A., Bernstein, J., & Njoku, O. (2023). Rising costs, supply-chain disruptions, and inflation challenges in the U.S. health care system. Health Affairs, 42(4), 245–252. Khan, M. N., Rahman, A., Rahman, M. M., & Mitra, D. K. (2023). Strengthening

nurse

Management of Headaches   Instructions:   For each scenario, please provide the following: · Identify the type of headache · Write your specific prescription(s) for the patient. (This must include the medication name, dose, route, and frequency as well as any special instructions that apply as you would include when

nurse

As part of your healthcare improvement planning, it is essential to identify and categorize the root causes of your identified practice problem.  This assignment uses the Ishikawa (Fishbone) Diagram – a widely used tool in root cause analysis – to help you organize contributing factors across key domains. · Access

Discussion #7 Clinical

Anything in this color is answers Module 7 Discussion   Weekly Clinical Experience 7 Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? Treating patients with endometriosis and the many challenges that they phase · Describe the assessment of

NRP 477

homework 1. What is virtual simulation? 2. What are the benefits and barriers to simulation? 3. What was the most important and least important lessons you learned using this simulation? 4. How has this experience enhanced your nursing leadership practice? 5. What, if any, changes will you make in your

help with home work

Help with homework  The purpose of this assignment is to critically appraise successful change in the workplace in support of evidence-based practice. You will apply a model of change to an identified problem within your workplace and identify how leadership and interprofessional collaboration can create and sustain a culture and

Approach concept

To prepare for this Assignment: Review the Learning Resources assigned this week. Review the Concept Map resources. Explore the listed agonist spectrum and consider the action and receptor of each: Agonist Partial agonist Antagonist Inverse agonist The Assignment You will submit a concept map exploring the four agonists on the

final project

  Write a 700-750 word paper including the following: 1. At the top of your paper, write, “I affirm that I have not received or given any unauthorized assistance on this assignment/exam. I understand that the instructor has access to information regarding my submission’s integrity.” 2. In your own words,

Lorem, Ipsum

JBI Appraisal Tool Utilization For each article you are required to utilize the appropriate JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. After you have determined which of the Tools is appropriate for the article, you will download the Word file of the Tool and fill it out. Once you have completed the 4

NUR 630

Reply from Leeann Chang Module 7 Discussion Minors discovering their gender identity is an immense provision towards psychological health, self-awareness and emotional level being stabilized. The Adolescence stage is a crucial one in the identity-making stage of development. The deprivation of the rights of minors to explore their gender can

springfield, Oasha

  Module 09 Lippincott Advisor for Education: Problem Based Care Plan Lippincott Advisor for Education: Problem Based Care Plan Lippincott Advisor for Education: Problem Based Care Plan Generator is located in the CoursePoint Dashboard folder. Develop a care plan for one of the following patient concerns (see grading rubric below):

learners assesment

Learner’s Need Assignment [Student Name] [Course Number]: [Course Name] [Professor’s Name] West Coast University Los Angeles Campus [Due Date] Learners Needs Assignment Learning Style Assessment [What does the client (patient/family) say about their learning style?] Teaching Approach [How will you teach a client with this learning style?] Readiness Evaluation [How

NUR 514 discussion #7

Module 7 Discussion   Female Patient Cases 5 For this Discussion, your instructor will assign you three case  numbers. Case 4  Cases The Diagnosis criteria for Pre-eclampsia based on the ACOG guidelines and the maternal and fetal complications related. Questions for the case · Discuss the Diagnosis criteria for Pre-eclampsia based

IV

Instructions Read the scenario below and respond using clear, concise clinical reasoning. Your response must be a paragraph long. This assignment assesses your foundational knowledge of IV insertion, complication recognition, and appropriate nursing interventions. Scenario You begin your shift and take over care for a patient receiving IV fluids at