Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

value of safety and quality agenda

Assessment 3: Instructions
Attached Files:

 HEAL5001 Assessment 3 Rubric.pdf HEAL5001 Assessment 3 Rubric.pdf – Alternative Formats (423.391 KB)
Instructions

Imagine you are working as a safety and quality partner for a health care organisation. You have been

asked to prepare a report and presentation to the executive team to demonstrate the importance of a
safety and quality agenda, emphasising the value of organisational culture. The approach has been set
and it has been decided to show the value of a safety and quality agenda by examining a major failing in
another health care service.

As such select one of the following public inquiries:

 Bristol Royal Infirmary

 Bundaberg Inquiry

 King Edward Memorial Hospital

 Royal Liverpool Children’s NHS Trust Inquiry

 Shipman Inquiry

 The Allitt Inquiry

 An inquiry of your choice that relates to a health service (check with Sharon if not sure)
And summarise the inquiry in a 2,000 word report (+/- 10%), covering the following areas:

 What happened?

 How it happened?

 Who was involved?

 Why did it go undetected for a period of time?

 What recommendations were made?

 What group(s) of professionals were involved?

 Who discovered the problem?
This is not an exhaustive list of questions; the report can be tackled any way you feel will give the best
overall summary and convey the quality and safety implications for health care services.

Once the report is prepared, create a supporting slide deck of no more than 12 slides (including a

title/introductory slide and a wrap up slide) to summarise the report, focusing on the key findings and
recommendations. This slide deck will be presented to the executive to support the report, so it should be
realistic, concise, clear and well formatted.

Support the slides with notes to include the detail that will be discussed and use the slide itself for the

simple key messages. Use supporting images and graphics where appropriate. See the section on
structure below for more information on how to submit the report and presentation as single document.

Please ensure that appropriate APA 7th edition referencing, as per university standards, is included for
both the report and presentation as needed.

Structure

A single document must be submitted to Turnitin, therefore the following outline structure is suggested:

1. Cover Page

2. Contents
3. Part A: Report
4. Part B: Presentation

5. References
As such the slides will need to be added into the main document ensuring the transcript/slide notes are
also copied/visible. The simplest approach will be to copy a slide from PowerPoint and paste it into Word
and then copy the slide notes and manually paste them under the copied slide.

Questions

If you have questions about the assignment it is recommended that you post a question on the
Discussion Board.

Marking

The marking rubric is attached to show how marks are allocated.

Grades

Grades will be available via Blackboard within three weeks of the submission date.

This assignment is worth 35% and is due by 9.00 am AWST on Friday the 18th October 2024.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

critical thinking 3

Module 3: Critical Thinking/Application Prompts  · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 50   · Submitting a text entry box Instructions Each week, you will be presented with a series of critical thinking prompts and application prompts. Please copy/paste the prompts into an offline document (Word, for example) and compose your responses offline (be

case4

Module 4 – Case HR Program Effectiveness; Employee Performance Management (Best Practices); Future of Talent Management Case Assignment (Signature Assignment: Critical thinking, Reinforced Level) After reading required materials in Module 4, review the following case (which is the same case read for SLP 4): Wirtz, J., & Heracleous, L. (2012). 

SLP4

Module 4 – SLP HR Program Effectiveness; Employee Performance Management (Best Practices); Future of Talent Management Assignment Overview After reading required materials in Module 4, review the following case (which is the same case read for Case 4): Wirtz, J., & Heracleous, L. (2012).  Singapore Airlines: Managing human resources for

Reflection 4

In the Module 4 Reflective Discussion, please reflect on everything you have learned in this course, by addressing the following:  Paragraphs 1-3:  Given the readings and assignments in the course, identify and discuss three important concepts applicable to your work experience, profession, and/or career plans for the future. Describe how

Benchmark 4

Benchmark #4: Project Report and/or Project Deliverable – Rough Draft(s)  I will send you the prior assignments that go along with this rough draft that you did for me prior to this draft. · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 200   · Submitting a file upload Please submit here a Rough Draft of

Human Resource Management 3 Assignment

Difference in Performance Review Imagine that you have an employee that rates themself very highly on their self-appraisal, but you know that their actual performance is very poor, and a have evaluated them accordingly in your managerial evaluation. How do you either bridge the gap or communicate the bad news?  

Human Resource Management

Purpose From your first assignment, you have a job description that details the important tasks and duties and KSAOs for the job you analyzed.  You will use that job title and job description for this assignment. For Assignment 2, you will demonstrate your understanding of job evaluation and pricing jobs

Individual Report Submission

Please see attached.  Example Individual Submission: Showcasing the Accessible Workplace Program LinkedIn Post Proud to share my work on the Accessible Workplace Program, a capstone project aimed at creating inclusive and supportive environments for employees with physical disabilities. I focused on redesigning job descriptions and developing onboarding strategies to ensure

Discussion 4 MR

On your TLC Home page, click on “Additional Library Resources” to access the IBISWorld Industry Research tool. · Click on “IBISWorld.” · Search “Business Coaching in the U.S.” · Click individually on the topics across the tan-colored ribbon above the “IBISWORLD Industry Report 61143” headline · Respond to the following:

Human Resource Management Assignment #6

The new benefit you propose must be something new and innovative. (The benefit should not be something already commonly offered as a benefit , e.g.: medical, dental, tuition reimbursement, etc.) Imagine that you are delivering this presentation to c-suite executives that are the decision-makers on the matter. Your objective is

Nov 4 Post about Long-term executive incentive

Please see attached.  List and describe five Long -Term Executive Incentives – Refer to Chapter 14 Compensation Of Special Groups The first part of Chapter 14 identifies and describes the unique characteristics that apply to special groups: · Supervisors · Corporate directors · Executives · Scientists and engineers (professionals) ·

benchmark 3

I have added benchmark 1 for your review.  There is no benchmark 2, so proceed with #3 Benchmark #3: Literature Review and Methodology  · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 150   · Submitting a file upload For Benchmark #3, please include the  most current, updated drafts of the following: 1. Your methodology section if

ogl 570 wk 2

OGL 570 Instructions In each module, you will have the opportunity to participate in an online discussion forum.  This week, you have a  choice of which prompt to respond to. Hot Tip:   It might be helpful to copy-paste the discussion prompts into an offline document (Word, for example), compose your responses

Module 3 Case

Module 3 – Case Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships Assignment Overview Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Reinforced Level In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be assessed at the “reinforced” level. The Quantitative Reasoning rubric will be useful for this purpose. In MGT511, quantitative reasoning skills were assessed at

module 3 SLP

Module 3 – SLP Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships 360-Degree Appraisal The 360-degree appraisal approach entails collecting performance information from several workers who interact with the employee being evaluated. For example, information can be collected from supervisors, subordinates, customers, and peers. In some situations, employees also evaluate their own

Module 2 ogl 551

Module 1: Learning Materials IMPORTANT NOTE :   Anything in the  “Learning Materials” content area  (excluding “Supplemental Learning Materials”)  is “fair game” for the quizzes(as is any other content presented in the module).  You’ll also be doing some analysis and synthesis types of writing in this graduate-level course, so be sure to read