Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Hide Assignment InformationTurnitinThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin.InstructionsReflective Integration Write a two to three-page paper (not including cover and reference pages) that re

Hide Assignment InformationTurnitinThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin.InstructionsReflective Integration 

Write a two to three-page paper (not including cover and reference pages) that responds to the following prompt:

You are getting settled into your seat for a very long plane ride home. As you get to know the person next to you, you learn that they are a devout atheist who believes that God is a myth that people have invented to make them feel better. After listening carefully to why this person does not believe in God, you have an opportunity to explain why you do believe in God. What would you say? In your response, you may share your personal story or testimony of faith (although not required), but you must share some objective evidence to support your faith in God and back up this evidence with solid, academic sources. Incorporate at least four references from the reading assignments, supplementary reading material, class lectures, and personal observations into your paper. Use APA formatting and be sure to properly source and cite all references.

Why do you believe God exists? What are your logic-based reasons? If your personal testimony never occurred, or before you personal experience happened, were there logical reasons to believe in the existence of God? Your paper should explain why is it more logical to believe in theism ("God exists") rather than in atheism ("God does not exist"). Select one argument (and only one argument) for the existence of God, and then provide a depth of analysis on that single argument. The following list provides popular arguments for the existence of God:

  • Video: The Argument from Design: The Fine-Tuning of the Universe
  • Website: The First Cause Argument
  • Website: The Argument from Conscience
  • Website: The Argument from Morality
  • Website: The Argument from Desire

To defend and analyze an argument means to answer Yes to these questions and give an explanation: Are the key terms clear? Are the premises true? Is the conclusion logical? Logical thinking skills must be demonstrated in contrast to merely sharing stories, experiences, or emotions. The vast majority of the paper should primarily focus on presenting an argument for the existence of God, rather than focus on responding to objections against the existence of God. Again, present with depth a logical argument and then defend it. 

You must share some objective evidence to support your belief in God's existence, and back up this objective evidence with solid, academic sources. Objective evidence means logic and data. For this philosophy course, the paper should not try and prove the validity nor historicity of the Bible, but instead, present the philosophical logic for the existence of God. After the first half-page, the paper should not (a) share personal testimonies, or (b) share subjective experiences, or (c) merely quote the Bible as supernatural revelation, which an atheist would not consider authoritative.

Note: This is a dialogue. Write as if you are having the conversation with this person. It might be hard to fully write a complete back-and-forth of every part of the exchange, but make sure to include how you would present your personal experience and your rational arguments for God’s existence. This paper is intentionally moving you toward a personal formulation of your worldview and preparing you to write your final worldview paper for this class.

Scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on add a file, then click submit to upload your assignment by the posted due date. Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.

Reflective Integration

Write a two to three-page paper (not including cover and reference pages) that responds to the following prompt:

You are getting settled into your seat for a very long plane ride home. As you get to know the person next to you, you learn that they are a devout atheist who believes that God is a myth that people have invented to make them feel better. After listening carefully to why this person does not believe in God, you have an opportunity to explain why you do believe in God. What would you say? In your response, you may share your personal story or testimony of faith (although not required), but you must share some objective evidence to support your faith in God and back up this evidence with solid, academic sources.Incorporate at least four references from the reading assignments, supplementary reading material, class lectures, and personal observations into your paper. Use APA formatting and be sure to properly source and cite all references.

Why do you believe God exists? What are your logic-based reasons? If your personal testimony never occurred, or before your personal experience happened, were there logical reasons to believe in the existence of God? Your paper should explain why is it more logical to believe in theism (“God exists”) rather than in atheism (“God does not exist”). Select one argument (and only one argument) for the existence of God, and then provide a depth of analysis on that single argument. The following list provides popular arguments for the existence of God:

  • Video: The Argument from Design: The Fine-Tuning of the Universe
  • Website: The First Cause Argument
  • Website: The Argument from Conscience
  • Website: The Argument from Morality
  • Website: The Argument from Desire

To defend and analyze an argument means to answer Yes to these questions and give an explanation: Are the key terms clear? Are the premises true? Is the conclusion logical? Logical thinking skills must be demonstrated in contrast to merely sharing stories, experiences, or emotions. The vast majority of the paper should primarily focus on presenting an argument for the existence of God, rather than focus on responding to objections against the existence of God. Again, present with depth a logical argument and then defend it. 

You must share some objective evidence to support your belief in God’s existence, and back up this objective evidence with solid, academic sources. Objective evidence means logic and data. For this philosophy course, the paper should not try and prove the validity nor historicity of the Bible, but instead, present the philosophical logic for the existence of God. After the first half-page, the paper should not (a) share personal testimonies, or (b) share subjective experiences, or (c) merely quote the Bible as supernatural revelation, which an atheist would not consider authoritative.

Note: This is a dialogue. Write as if you are having the conversation with this person. It might be hard to fully write a complete back-and-forth of every part of the exchange, but make sure to include how you would present your personal experience and your rational arguments for God’s existence. This paper is intentionally moving you toward a personal formulation of your worldview and preparing you to write your final worldview paper for this class.

Scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on add a file, then click submit to upload your assignment by the posted due date. Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.

Due on Dec 8, 2024 11:59 PM

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

New Testament Discussion –Note some interesting differences and similarities among the 4 gospels that were new to you, and why you find them interesting. –What strikes you as particularly interesti

New Testament Discussion –Note some interesting differences and similarities among the 4 gospels that were new to you, and why you find them interesting.  –What strikes you as particularly interesting about the NT letters and what makes it interesting? –Share amongst yourselves ideas for teaching the Gospels in the classroom,

️ A PERSONAL WARNING TO ACADEMIC WRITERS I want to share this for any writer still working on Studydaddy.com. In my experience, that platform is a serious waste of time and effort. After completing or

️ A PERSONAL WARNING TO ACADEMIC WRITERS I want to share this for any writer still working on Studydaddy.com. In my experience, that platform is a serious waste of time and effort. After completing orders and delivering work, it often feels like working for free. Earnings are heavily reduced, and

Studydaddy Critics You all noticed that the site’s support team has basically ghosted everyone. No replies to tickets, no fixing complaints, no refunds, no dispatching payments straight radio silence.

Studydaddy Critics You all noticed that the site’s support team has basically ghosted everyone. No replies to tickets, no fixing complaints, no refunds, no dispatching payments straight radio silence. So yeah, we got fed up and threw this dumb little script. It just keeps posting this same question after approximately

NOTICE TO ACADEMIC WRITERS To all writers currently working on Studydaddy.com, Over time, many writers have expressed concerns about high commission deductions, lack of transparency, and poor communic

NOTICE TO ACADEMIC WRITERS To all writers currently working on Studydaddy.com, Over time, many writers have expressed concerns about high commission deductions, lack of transparency, and poor communication on certain academic platforms. These challenges make it difficult for writers to grow, earn fairly, and work in a supportive environment. In

WRITER WARNING & OPPORTUNITY NOTICE Attention Academic Writers Many writers describe Studydaddy.com as one of the worst platforms to spend your time and effort on. Based on repeated writer reports

WRITER WARNING & OPPORTUNITY NOTICE Attention Academic Writers Many writers describe Studydaddy.com as one of the worst platforms to spend your time and effort on. Based on repeated writer reports, working on the platform often feels like working without proper pay. According to shared writer experiences: Writers are paid only

Studydaddy Critics You all noticed that the site’s support team has basically ghosted everyone. No replies to tickets, no fixing complaints, no refunds, no dispatching payments straight radio silence.

Studydaddy Critics You all noticed that the site’s support team has basically ghosted everyone. No replies to tickets, no fixing complaints, no refunds, no dispatching payments straight radio silence. So yeah, we got fed up and threw this dumb little script. It just keeps posting this same question after approximately

Studydaddy Critics You all noticed that the site’s support team has basically ghosted everyone. No replies to tickets, no fixing complaints, no refunds, no dispatching payments straight radio silence.

Studydaddy Critics You all noticed that the site’s support team has basically ghosted everyone. No replies to tickets, no fixing complaints, no refunds, no dispatching payments straight radio silence. So yeah, we got fed up and threw this dumb little script. It just keeps posting this same question after approximately

Discussion for American History to 1865: Assignment: Name and give detailed examples of four colonies established in the New World by the four major European colonizing nations. Contrast their major

Discussion for American History to 1865:  Assignment: Name and give detailed examples of four colonies established in the New World by the four major European colonizing nations.  Contrast their major differences.  Please write this casually, nothing fancy. Make sure you review the Discussion Rubric (attached) to see the guidelines for

Old Testament Discussion Produce an exegesis of a passage of Scripture. Choose a story from the Hebrew Scriptures. Say where it is found in the Bible and explain it in your own words (this is the lit

Old Testament Discussion Produce an exegesis of a passage of Scripture.  Choose a story from the Hebrew Scriptures. Say where it is found in the Bible and explain it in your own words (this is the literalmeaning). Then, offer a spiritual interpretation using (at least) one of the three spiritual senses: The allegorical, the moral,

Discussion for American History to 1865: Assignment: Write a detailed definition of the ‘Columbian Exchange’ and it’s global impact upon the Old and New Worlds. Make sure that you are reviewing the

Discussion for American History to 1865: Assignment: Write a detailed definition of the ‘Columbian Exchange’ and it’s global impact upon the Old and New Worlds. Make sure that you are reviewing the Discussion Rubric under Module 1 to view the guidelines as far as expectations on posts.  The top level

Module 4 Reading Assignment • Check out the module 4 videos. • Read the last two chapters book two of MC, “The Perfect Penitent,” and “The Practical Conclusion.” Module Tasks Respond to the following

Module 4 Reading Assignment • Check out the module 4 videos. • Read the last two chapters book two of MC, “The Perfect Penitent,” and “The Practical Conclusion.” Module Tasks Respond to the following questions in ~150 words per question: 1. The problem of evil (theodicy) is a major point

**** KEONIA- HUMANITIES- UP TO 2/1/2025*** ***** IMPORTANT: PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI/ PLAGERISE AS THE ASSIGNMENT WILL BE RUN THROUGH TURN IT IN!!!!!***** ******

**** KEONIA- HUMANITIES- UP TO 2/1/2025*** ***** IMPORTANT: PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI/ PLAGERISE AS THE ASSIGNMENT WILL BE RUN THROUGH TURN IT IN!!!!!*****  ****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 4 PARTS / PLEASE LABEL EACH PART SEPARATELY WITH REFERENCES WHEN COMPLETED****** **** HUMANITIES COURSE

Anthropology Discussion Every pedagogy is built on an anthropology: A theory of how human beings operate and learn. In other words, every approach to teaching humans starts with some idea of what it m

Anthropology Discussion Every pedagogy is built on an anthropology: A theory of how human beings operate and learn. In other words, every approach to teaching humans starts with some idea of what it means to be human. Behaviorism, constructivism, even early childhood approaches like Montessori or Reggio Emilia all have

Anthropology Discussion Every pedagogy is built on an anthropology: A theory of how human beings operate and learn. In other words, every approach to teaching humans starts with some idea of what it m

Anthropology Discussion Every pedagogy is built on an anthropology: A theory of how human beings operate and learn. In other words, every approach to teaching humans starts with some idea of what it means to be human. Behaviorism, constructivism, even early childhood approaches like Montessori or Reggio Emilia all have