Description
Hello everyone
I kindly need your support with the following question please, Thanks.
Critical Thinking Assignment (100 points)
In this critical thinking assignment,
you will explore the role of internal and external consultants,
organizational teams, and employee engagement in the change management
process. You will analyze the various factors that influence an
organization’s decision to utilize consultants, the impact of teams on
change management, and the importance of employees as change agents.
- Access the potential advantages and disadvantages of using
internal and external consultants in change management initiatives.
Provide examples of specific scenarios or situations where the use of
internal or external consultants would be more appropriate, and explain
your reasoning. - Evaluate the potential challenges that can arise when using teams
in the change management process, and suggest strategies for overcoming
these challenges. Provide examples of how the effective use of teams can
contribute to the successful implementation of organizational changes,
and explain the key factors that contribute to their success. - Examine strategies and techniques that organizations can use to
empower and encourage employees to become active participants in the
change management process. Provide examples of how employee-driven
change initiatives have contributed to the successful implementation of
organizational changes, and analyze the key factors that enabled
employee engagement and ownership of the change process.
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
- Be 5-6 pages in length, which does not include the title and
reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum
requirements. - Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.
- Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least four scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
- It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into the
Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting it to your instructor
for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the
Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check – Student
Guide for step-by-step instructions. - Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
Regards
Abdul
CT_Rubric_100
Description
100 Points
Rubric Detail
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Some Expectations
Unsatisfactory
Content
33 to 35 points
29 to 32 points
26 to 28 points
0 to 25 points
Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive knowledge of
the materials, with no
errors or major
omissions.
Demonstrates adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may include
some minor errors or
omissions.
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the materials
and/or includes some
major errors or omissions.
Fails to demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many major
errors or omissions.
33 to 35 points
29 to 32 points
26 to 28 points
0 to 25 points
Provides strong thought,
insight, and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides adequate
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts and
applications.
Provides poor though,
insight, and analysis of
concepts and applications.
Provides little or no
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts and
applications.
15 to 15 points
13 to 14 points
11 to 12 points
0 to 10 points
Sources go above and
beyond required criteria
and are well chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Sources meet required
criteria and are
adequately chosen to
provide substance and
perspectives on the issue
under examination.
Sources meet required
criteria but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and perspectives
on the issue under
examination.
Source selection and
integration of knowledge
from the course is clearly
deficient.
15 to 15 points
13 to 14 points
11 to 12 points
0 to 10 points
Project is clearly
organized, well written,
and in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and paragraph
structure, contains no
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style, or
APA citations and
references.
Project is fairly well
organized and written
and is in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Reasonably
good sentence and
paragraph structure, may
include a few minor
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style, or APA
citations and references.
Project is poorly organized
and written and may not
follow proper format as
outlined in the assignment.
Inconsistent to inadequate
sentence and paragraph
development, and/or
includes numerous or
major errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style or APA
citations and references.
Project is not organized
or well written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor quality
work; unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style, and
APA citations and
references.
Analysis
Sources
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
View Associated Items
Print
Close Window
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
