Please refer to attachment
PlanDiscussion 6: The Importance of Solutions in a Strategic Plan
YOUR INITIAL DISCUSSION MUST BE SUBMITTED BY 4:00 PM EASTERN TIME.
THERE ARE NO PEER RESPONSES FOR THIS DISCUSSION.
Please note that all articles for weekly discussions are current scholarly articles that will assist you in future research. In addition, you will need to find one scholarly article for this discussion to support your thoughts.
No books can be used, only current scholarly journals that are labelled academic, peer-reviewed, or refereed journals. To receive credit for this discussion, all of your references must align with in-text citations and be complete with all information (i.e., authors, date, title, source) to include the DOI or the URL. This will help faculty retrieve the source to determine if the source meets the requirements of the submission. Each paragraph must have at least 5 to 6 academic sentences with at least 2 or more current scholarly sources (past 5 to 7 years). Review the rubric below.
Directions for this discussion:
If you plan to enroll in the strategic research project, you will be asked to develop a problem and then seek at least four solutions to that specific problem. In this discussion, you will have
three paragraphs of research explaining the (Part 1)
importance for finding a solution of a problem in a strategic plan, (Part 2) the
importance of identifying pros and cons of a solution, and (Part 3) the i
mportance of identifying barriers/obstacles of a solution. This should be supported by
at least 2 current scholarly articles (past 5 to 7 years)
in each of the three separate paragraphs, approximately 5 to 6 academic sentences per paragraph.
No attachments for any discussions . . . Please submit in the text box area.
No generative artificial intelligence can be used as sources for discussions to include no use of Grammarly or any other platform that modifies and content and sources.
No Secondary Sources, No Direct Quotes, No Bullets, No Abbreviations, No Acronyms, and No Contractions are allowed. You are responsible for your full interpretation of the content with the understanding that every paragraph must have at a minimum of 5 to 6 academic sentences with 2 or more current scholarly articles (past 5 to 7 years) to validate your claims. Your response should be a minimum of 350 words and should address the full discussion requirements; do not minimize your response. There is no need to respond to any of your colleagues for this discussion. Review the attached rubric.
Responses to Initial Discussions (10 points)
Responses to discussion questions are expected to be comprehensive, well organized, and well written. They must demonstrate familiarity with the material covered (i.e., assigned readings, scholarly sources), ability to explicate ideas discussed (e.g., clear presentation of key terms and ideas), and interpretation and application of the material in relevant contexts (i.e., how the ideas relate to concrete situations in today’s environments). Your initial submission must be in depth with a required minimum of 350 words. Points will be deducted if the word count is not met.
