Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

week 2

attached

Discussion 1

Read the following SPL overview and review the tables that follow.

SPL Overview

Throughout your program you will be introduced to the many challenges leaders face in managing complex individual and group dynamics. Leaders today must shape organizational culture, communicate value systems, model ethical behavior, engage and inspire followers, and manage diversity. To achieve these tasks effectively, leaders must be able to integrate scholarship and practice. Integrating scholarship and practice involves obtaining a theoretical understanding of core leadership principles through scholarly research and study. Integrating scholarship and practice also means that leaders convert their theoretical understanding into daily, observable leadership behaviors and practices. Leaders who integrate scholarship and practice are typically effective in both personal and professional arenas. Leaders who integrate scholarship and practice are also able to lead organizations during difficult and challenging times.

There is a difference between being a scholar and a practitioner. According to Winter and Griffiths (2000), a scholar possesses reliable and impartial theoretical knowledge. Scholars obtain this knowledge by studying theory and conducting research. Practitioners, conversely, possess application-based knowledge specifically geared toward the workplace. As University of Phoenix doctoral students, you will have the opportunity to obtain, enact, and create both scholar and practitioner knowledge.

Leadership Practice 

In his highly publicized book,
 Good to Great, Jim Collins (2001) portrayed a level-5 leader as an individual who displays a balance between humility and will. Level 5 leaders are self-aware individuals who are able to conduct honest, rigorous, and candid self-appraisal. They articulate their strengths and weaknesses and are able to integrate feedback from others and from the research they conduct. Level 5 leaders know how to integrate theory and practice; they have scholarly knowledge of leadership theory and can translate that theory into effective leadership behavior. Level 5 leaders transform theory into practice through their ability to create organizational discipline in 3 arenas: disciplined employees, disciplined thinking, and disciplined behaviors and actions. When organizations display discipline, leaders do not have to maintain a strict chain of command. When organizational members demonstrate disciplined thinking, leaders do not have to impose bureaucracy. When organizations display disciplined behaviors and actions, leaders do not have to exercise unnecessary control.

One critically important characteristic of level 5 leaders is that they display internal consistency. In statistics, internal consistency means that test items measure the same idea or concept. For leaders, internal consistency means that leaders’ actions and behaviors are consistent with or match their communication and intentions. For example, it is inconsistent to say you are a participative leader if you micromanage people. It is inconsistent to say you are a servant leader (Greenleaf, 1977), yet display egocentric, individualistic behavior. As doctoral students, it is important to convert the scholarship gained through online study and coursework into internally consistent leadership practice. It is only with this level of consistency and emotional maturity that leaders will gain trust and commitment from followers.

Determining Your Strategic Fit 

As doctoral students, your challenge is to assess yourself and determine your strategic fit. Determining your strategic fit means using critical thinking to evaluate how you will maintain a balance between your scholarly and practitioner experience. You must determine if you possess the 21st-century competencies needed to lead organizations, how you will acquire the competencies you lack, and how to add your own findings to the existing understanding of organizations and leadership. You must determine how you will balance the scholar/practitioner relationship, that is, how you will translate the theoretical knowledge you gain in each course into observable, leadership actions and behaviors. You must strive for internal consistency by having the courage to critically analyze, using available literature and data, and adjusting your behaviors and actions to ensure that they match your words. If you notice inconsistencies, do not proceed with actions that do not successfully pass your assessment and mirror your desired state.

Keep in mind that when you integrate your own voice by bringing scholarship and practice together, you are reaching stage 3. You need courage to build upon the published scholarship by adding your professional experience and voice in a skilled manner.​

Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:

· Reflect on how your writing may be biased toward your own ideas and your own situatedness. Use these questions as a guide:

· How has your writing changed since beginning the doctoral program?

· How may your writing be out of alignment to the elements of the SPL model?

· What are some areas still needing improvement?

Discussion 2

View the
AES Model and Guide for Summarizing, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Synthesizing Information.

Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:

· What are the components of the three-stage model?

· What are the different types of thinking associated with AES?

· What might the challenges be to reach synthesis?  

Assignment 1

Exam Content

This assignment will challenge you to identify the assumptions, context, situatedness, and embedded logic of an argument through the close reading of a non-scholarly text. This is not an exercise in determining whether the author is right or wrong in their position, as these value judgments are typically irrelevant to the purpose of scholarship. Instead, unearthing these components through an analytical process allows you to discover evidence of (conscious or unconscious) “decisions” made by the author in their writing. This evidence will (in turn) assist you in making valid, empirically driven claims regarding the text.

Complete the
Critical Reading: Deconstructing a Non-Scholarly Text Worksheet using your selected text. 

image1.png

image2.png

image3.png

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

12 Integrating disabilities

  Students with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Discuss the characteristics of students who have Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.  How might understanding the characteristics and/or causes of a student’s disability help a teacher integrate them into the classroom?   What are some of the models used for teaching these students and integrating them into

11 Integrating developmental disabilities

  Students with Severe Disabilities Discuss the characteristics of students who have severe disabilities.  How might understanding the characteristics and/or causes of a student’s disability help a teacher integrate them into the classroom?   What are some of the models used for teaching these students and integrating them into the class?

K-12 Leadership Administration

Case study analysis for case study 9: The New Photocopier and case study 10:  How Safe is the school?  From the book, Thd principal by Gerald Ubben, Larry Hughes and Cynthia Norris

children lit

Offer ideas about how the life experience they identified might be approached in fiction for children in age range they identified.  What type of plot, point of view, and characters might be effective and why? ½ pages in MLA While reading Chapter 10 about  Realistic Fiction, I learned that these

Follow the instruction below and the attachment

Use the attachment below Directions: Submit the first component of your research proposal, i.e., the introduction. Please make sure you adhere to APA format and submit the assignment in a Microsoft Word document. Also, please use the headers specified in the rubric, i.e., statement of the problem, purpose of the

which is the best institue for fire and safety course in ranchi

PDFmyURL converts web pages and even full websites to PDF easily and quickly. Ranchi, Jharkhand. [email protected] Opening Hours : Monday to Saturay – 8 AM to 5 PM Need Help? call us free +91-96084 49971 HOME ABOUT TECHNICAL COURSES EDUCATION COURSES GALLERY PRESENCE FACILITIES FRANCHISE VERIFICATION Diploma in Fire &

discussion response

Discussion 1 Work: Out of the negotiation tactics presented in this discussion, I chose the Zone of Possible Agreement (ZOPA) tactic as I believe it connects with the way I generally handle things.  With the ZOPA tactic, the two parties involved in the negotiation try to find common ground or a

Education ED assignment

Ed Unit I assignment 1. From Desks to Dialogues: How Inquiry-Based Curriculum Transforms Student Voice in the Classroom This topic explores how shifting from traditional teacher-centered instruction to inquiry-based models changes student participation, critical thinking, and agency. It would examine both theoretical foundations and practical classroom implications, especially in middle

formative assessment with rubric.

How to complete a formative assessment with a rubric. SPED 7720 & 7721: Assessment Portfolio Template Your Name: _________________________ Date: ____________ Program: M.A.T or M.Ed.: ___________________________ *Be sure to attach the following in one PDF file: · Copy of the formative assessment with scoring criteria · Copy of the grading

vaeh

please see attachments Title: Business Expansion Proposal Company: Global Sports Inc. Introduction our company is planning to expand into new markets. we need to analyze current trends and develop a strategic approach. the main focus should be customer engagement, market analysis and revenue generation. Objectives increase sales growth enhance brand

Preparing for Enactment

I need help with this assignment Teach! Coursework Preparing for Enactment | Postwork – Early Childhood This postwork has three parts. Refer to the Criteria for Success to help you on this assignment. Part 1: Lesson Plan ● Using your previously submitted postwork assignments, complete the Lesson Plan. Part 2:

Presenting Instructional Content: Supporting Diverse Learners

I need help with this assignment Teach! Coursework Presenting Instructional Content: Scaffolding | Postwork – Early Childhood This postwork will utilize the same lesson as your Lesson Internalization and Effortful Thinking postwork from previous sessions. Directions: This postwork includes two parts. 1. Draft an introduction to new material. 2. Rehearse

Presenting Instructional Content: Scaffolding

I need help with this assignment Teach! Coursework Presenting Instructional Content: Scaffolding | Postwork – Early Childhood This postwork will utilize the same lesson as your Lesson Internalization and Effortful Thinking postwork from previous sessions. Directions: This postwork includes two parts. 1. Draft an introduction to new material. 2. Rehearse

Presenting Instructional Content: Introduction to New Material

I need help with this assignment Teach! Coursework Presenting Instructional Content: Introduction to New Material | Postwork – Early Childhood This postwork will utilize the same lesson as your Lesson Internalization and Effortful Thinking postwork from previous sessions. Directions: Draft an introduction to new material. Lesson Context Link to Lesson

Effortful Thinking: Exemplars and MIsconceptions

I need help with this assignment Teach! Coursework Effortful Thinking: Exemplars & Misconceptions | Postwork Rubric Effortful Thinking: Exemplars & Misconceptions (95%) Individualized Feedback 0 Points 0 Points 1 Point 2 Points 3 Points 4 Points Individualized Feedback & Follow-up Questions Criteria ● Student’s paper is marked with the code

Effortful Thinking:Activating Prior Knowledge

Need help with this assignment Teach! Coursework Effortful Thinking: Activating Prior Knowledge | Postwork – Early Childhood This postwork will utilize the same lesson as your Lesson Internalization postwork from previous sessions. Directions: Complete this postwork document, including: ● Analyze HQIM to Determine Relevant Prior Knowledge & Prerequisite Skills –

questions

 Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference       

quita Literature Review and Outline

  Topic:   Understanding Poverty Through the Eyes of Inequality, Access, and Long-Term Impact Any use of AI will receive an automatic 0 Assignment should include summary and outline The  purpose of this assignment is for you to provide information from  current publications about your research topic.  You will also state