Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

WEEK 5

Please see attached for instruction

To Prepare

· By Day 1, your instructor will assign a mood or anxiety disorder diagnosis for you to use for this Assignment.

· Research signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments, and appropriate community resources and referrals.

Assigned diagnosis is Autism spectrum disorder

The Assignment

In a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience, explain signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments, and appropriate community resources and referrals.
Although you are not required to respond to colleagues, collegial discussion is welcome. 

Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience: • Explain signs and symptoms for the assigned diagnosis in children and adolescents.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for children and adolescents with the diagnosis.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

ENABLERS AND BARRIERS TO TRANSLATION

ENABLERS AND BARRIERS TO TRANSLATION There are many hurdles to overcome when it comes to the translation of evidence into practice. As noted in White et al. (2024), of all the identified evidence, only about half of it is ever actually put into practice. Thus, being able to detect the

EBP, IS, AND QI

2 A Blog on Observation of EBP Student’s name Institution affiliation Course Instructor’s name Date A Blog on Observation of EBP Abu-Baker et al. (2021) explain that the role of the DNP-prepared nurse encompasses responsibility for the promotion of EBP in practice to help ensure that patient care provided is

TRANSLATION FRAMEWORKS/MODELS

  White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2024). Translation of evidence into nursing and healthcare (4th ed.). Springer.  Chapter 2, “The Science of Translation and Major Frameworks” (pp. 25–53)  Chapter 3, “Change Theories for Translation” (pp. 53–67)  Jones-Schenk, J., & Bleich, M. R. (2019). Implementation science as a leadership

nursing

Evaluate Safety Data and Emergency Preparedness (Competencies 5.2g, 5.2h, 5.2j) Complete that teaches how to analyze safety data against national benchmarks and evaluate emergency preparedness plans. Completion Evidence – a case study analysis applying course concepts.

Nursing homework

NSG/486CA: Public Health: Health Promotion And Disease Prevention Global Health and GHI Presentation  This assessment has 2 parts: · Part 1: Evaluate your global health knowledge by assessing an emerging global health issue (GHI). Address factors that exacerbate the issue and develop a plan for improvement. · Part 2: Present

2nd peer review article

This is the reference for the article: Annett, J., Tillson, M., Walker, M., Webster, J. M., & Staton, M. (2023). Adverse childhood experiences and mental health among incarcerated women: Self-esteem as a mediating mechanism.  Child abuse & neglect,  146, 106486. NB: The database and resource used is PubMed Conduct an

Health policy

Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Which social determinant most affects this policy? Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples. The health

PW presentation Board of Nursing

To Prepare: · Assume that you are leading a staff development meeting on regulation for nursing practice at your healthcare organization or agency. · Review the NCSBN and ANA websites to prepare for your presentation. The Assignment: (10-slide PowerPoint presentation) Develop a 10-slide PowerPoint Presentation that addresses the following: ·

Psychology D3

The Psychology of Teams Deliverable 3 – Global Team Lesson Top of Form Bottom of Form Assessments Content 1. Top of Form Question <bdi></bdi> Competency Analyze the dynamics of team participation in a global environment. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is

Psychology D2

The Psychology of Teams Deliverable 2 – Approaches to Negotiation Top of Form Bottom of Form Assessments Content 1. Top of Form Question <bdi></bdi> Competency Interpret key areas of negotiation in team psychology. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with

ass94

Develop an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined. Submit the proposed intervention to the faculty for review and approval. This solution needs to be implemented (shared) with your patient, family, or group. You are not to share your intervention with

help with discussion

Reflect on your learning experience in this course. Which concepts stood out to you and made an impact?  How do you envision using these concepts in your future nursing practice as a master’s prepared nurse practitioner? Describe how course learning activities and assignments will help you achieve Program Outcome 3:

work study

To Prepare: · Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about assessing and diagnosing anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and trauma- and stressor-related disorders. · Download the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. Also review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar to see an example

unit 6 discussion

see attached Case Study Patient Intake and History The patient is a 26-year-old college graduate who is currently euthymic but who has a history of major depressive episodes. He has experienced major depressive episodes, mostly untreated, of varying lengths and severities since he was a teenager. His symptoms have included

Nursing UNIT 6 ASSIGNMENT

SEE ATTACHED Severe Mental Illness Severe mental illness can have a detrimental impact on the individual, family, and community. Many patients with severe mental illness require a lot of support from family and community agencies. Find one resource or agency in your community for patients with severe mental illness and

Healthcare Policy and Analysis

   Policy Healthcare Policy and Analysis Policy What are legislators currently doing to address your selected advocacy priorities for a vulnerable population? Are there current policies in place? Are there current policies proposed at either the state or federal level? What are the most obvious strengths and weaknesses of these

Evidence-Based Practice II

   Legal and Ethical Implications Evidence Based Practice II Legal and Ethical Implications Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts.  Respond to  at least two of your colleagues by supporting or expanding on their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives. PEER #1 Precious C Abidoye Precious C Abidoye Precious C Abidoye Precious