Description
Research some of the access control methods that are utilized within your organization. For example, does your organization leverage public key infrastructure (PKI), key card authentication, or login hours? If you are not currently working, what access control methods have you seen, and how effective were the control methods? Explore the pros and cons of each of the controls in your paper.
What steps are necessary to mitigate risk to an IT infrastructure’s confidentiality, integrity, and availability with sound access controls?
Directions:
- Your responses should be three pages in length, not including the title or reference pages.
- Be sure to provide citations from your readings and additional research to support your statements.
- Your paper must follow Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines, as appropriate.
MCS CT Rubric_60
Description
60 points
Rubric Detail
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Some Expectations
Unsatisfactory
Content
23 to 24 points
20 to 22 points
18 to 20 points
0 to 17 points
Demonstrates substantial and
extensive knowledge of the
materials, with no errors or
major omissions.
Demonstrates adequate
knowledge of the materials;
may include some minor
errors or omissions.
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or includes
some major errors or
omissions.
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major errors or
omissions.
17 to 18 points
15 to 16 points
13 to 14 points
0 to 12 points
Provides strong thought,
insight, and analysis to
appropriately justify and
support their technological
selections and choices.
Provides adequate thought,
insight, and analysis to
appropriately justify and
support their technological
selections and choices.
Provides poor thought,
insight, and analysis to
appropriately justify and
support their
technological selections
and choices.
Provides little or no
thought, insight, or
analysis.
9 to 9 points
8 to 8 points
7 to 7 points
0 to 6 points
References go above and
beyond required criteria and
are well chosen to provide
effective substance and
perspectives on the issue under
examination.
References meet required
criteria and are adequately
chosen to provide
substance and perspectives
on the issue under
examination.
References meet required
criteria but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the issue
under examination.
References are
clearly deficient.
9 to 9 points
8 to 8 points
7 to 7 points
0 to 6 points
Project is clearly organized, well
written, and in proper format as
outlined in the assignment.
Project is fairly well
organized and written and
is in proper format as
outlined in the assignment.
Project is poorly organized
and written and may not
follow proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Project is not in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Rationale
References
Formatting
View Associated Items
Print
Close Window
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
